{"id":255,"date":"2016-10-19T10:08:23","date_gmt":"2016-10-19T12:08:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/?p=255"},"modified":"2020-06-25T11:47:02","modified_gmt":"2020-06-25T14:47:02","slug":"evolutionary-models-and-phylogenetic-signal-assessment-via-mantel-test","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/2016\/10\/19\/evolutionary-models-and-phylogenetic-signal-assessment-via-mantel-test\/","title":{"rendered":"Evolutionary models and phylogenetic signal assessment via Mantel test"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"Heading\">\n\tAbstract<\/h2>\n<p class=\"Para\" id=\"Par1\">\n\tPhylogenetically closely related species tend to be more similar to each other than to more distantly related ones, a pattern called phylogenetic signal. Appropriate tests to evaluate the association between phylogenetic relatedness and trait variation among species are employed in a myriad of eco-evolutionary studies. However, most tests available to date are only suitable for datasets describing continuous traits, and are most often applicable only for single trait analysis. The Mantel test is a useful method to measure phylogenetic signal for multiple (continuous, binary and\/or categorical) traits. However, the classical Mantel test does not incorporate any evolutionary model (EM) in the analysis. Here, we describe a new analytical procedure, which incorporates explicitly an evolutionary model in the standard Mantel test (EM-Mantel). We run numerical simulations to evaluate its statistical properties, under different combinations of species pool size, trait type and number. Our results showed that EM-Mantel test has appropriate type I error and acceptable power, which increases with the strength of phylogenetic signal and with species pool size but depended on trait type. EM-Mantel test is a good alternative for measuring phylogenetic signal in binary and categorical traits and for datasets with multiple traits.<\/p>\n<p>\t<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/s11692-016-9396-1\"><em><strong>Read more<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract Phylogenetically closely related species tend to be more similar to each other than to more distantly related ones, a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/2016\/10\/19\/evolutionary-models-and-phylogenetic-signal-assessment-via-mantel-test\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span class=\"more-button\">Continue reading &gt;<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Evolutionary models and phylogenetic signal assessment via Mantel test<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[70,1],"tags":[18,19,21,17,20],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":757,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255\/revisions\/757"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/leff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}