{"id":7383,"date":"2023-11-09T15:39:34","date_gmt":"2023-11-09T18:39:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/?p=7383"},"modified":"2023-11-09T15:41:22","modified_gmt":"2023-11-09T18:41:22","slug":"defesa-de-dissertacao-maria-gomes-seibt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/defesa-de-dissertacao-maria-gomes-seibt\/","title":{"rendered":"DEFESA DE DISSERTA\u00c7\u00c3O: MARIA GOMES SEIBT"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
MEDIDAS LOCAIS E CONFIGURACIONAIS: EFEITOS PARA A CAMINHABILIDADE<\/strong>

MARIA GOMES SEIBT<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n

Orientador e Presidente da Banca<\/strong>
Ant\u00f4nio Tarc\u00edsio da Luz Reis (PROPUR\/UFRGS)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banca Examinadora
<\/strong>Prof.\u00aa Dr.\u00aa Andr\u00e9a Holz Pf\u00fctzenreuter (Examinadora Externa da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC)
Prof.\u00aa Dr.\u00aa Fabiana Bugs Antocheviz (Examinadora Externa do Instituto Federal Farroupilha – IFFAR)
Prof.\u00aa Dr.\u00aa M\u00e1rcia Azevedo de Lima (Examinadora Interna do PROPUR\/UFRGS)

Data:\u00a0<\/strong>10\/11\/2023
Hor\u00e1rio:<\/strong> 13h
Local:<\/strong> https:\/\/mconf.ufrgs.br\/webconf\/banca_dissertacao_mariaseibt<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

RESUMO
<\/strong>Esta pesquisa examina e compara os n\u00edveis de percep\u00e7\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a, de agradabilidade e de caminhabilidade de espa\u00e7os abertos p\u00fablicos em quadras com diferentes medidas locais e configuracionais, tendo como estudo de caso os bairros Bom Fim e Cidade Baixa (Porto Alegre\/RS). Logo, s\u00e3o objetivos deste trabalho: (1) analisar os n\u00edveis de caminhabilidade e a percep\u00e7\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a em quadras com diferentes caracter\u00edsticas locais; (2) analisar os n\u00edveis de caminhabilidade e a agradabilidade em quadras com diferentes caracter\u00edsticas locais; e (3) analisar os n\u00edveis de caminhabilidade e a percep\u00e7\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a em quadras com diferentes medidas configuracionais. Para tal, foram selecionadas para a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da pesquisa as quadras mais movimentadas em cada um dos dois bairros. Assim, as medidas locais levantadas para as an\u00e1lises s\u00e3o: os usos nos t\u00e9rreos das edifica\u00e7\u00f5es, o alinhamento das edifica\u00e7\u00f5es com rela\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0s cal\u00e7adas, as permeabilidades f\u00edsicas e visuais dos t\u00e9rreos das edifica\u00e7\u00f5es, a presen\u00e7a de vegeta\u00e7\u00e3o nas cal\u00e7adas e a largura e caracter\u00edsticas das cal\u00e7adas. Por sua vez, as medidas configuracionais consideradas para as an\u00e1lises s\u00e3o as medidas de integra\u00e7\u00e3o global e local (R5) e escolha de rota (choice) global e local (R5). Os demais dados foram coletados atrav\u00e9s de observa\u00e7\u00e3o de comportamento e question\u00e1rio. Os dados quantitativos foram analisados atrav\u00e9s de testes estat\u00edsticos n\u00e3o param\u00e9tricos e an\u00e1lises sint\u00e1ticas e os dados qualitativos foram analisados atrav\u00e9s de interpreta\u00e7\u00f5es dos significados e frequ\u00eancias. Os resultados revelam que: (1) uso residencial tem impacto positivo na percep\u00e7\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a, enquanto uso comercial, edifica\u00e7\u00f5es recuadas e altas taxas de permeabilidade visual e f\u00edsica tem impacto negativo na percep\u00e7\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a; (2) edifica\u00e7\u00f5es recuadas tem impacto negativo na agradabilidade; e (3) uso comercial nos t\u00e9rreos, edifica\u00e7\u00f5es alinhadas, taxas mais altas de permeabilidade visual e valores mais altos de choice global tem impacto positivo na caminhabilidade, enquanto uso residencial e edifica\u00e7\u00f5es recuadas tem impacto negativo na caminhabilidade. Por sua vez, os dados relativos \u00e0 presen\u00e7a de vegeta\u00e7\u00e3o apresentaram diferentes resultados em cada bairro. Ainda, as medidas locais se revelaram melhores indicadores dos n\u00edveis de caminhabilidade e percep\u00e7\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a que as medidas configuracionais. Dessa forma, espera-se que os resultados referentes \u00e0s medidas locais possam contribuir para a tomada de decis\u00f5es de profissionais de arquitetura e planejamento urbano e na elabora\u00e7\u00e3o de legisla\u00e7\u00f5es urban\u00edsticas que valorizem o pedestre e contribuam para a seguran\u00e7a, agradabilidade e caminhabilidade dos espa\u00e7os abertos p\u00fablicos, assim como contribuir para futuros trabalhos e \u00edndices de caminhabilidade.
Palavras-chave:<\/strong> Caminhabilidade. Percep\u00e7\u00e3o dos Usu\u00e1rios. Espa\u00e7o Aberto P\u00fablico. Interfaces T\u00e9rreas. Sintaxe Espacial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ABSTRACT<\/strong>
This research examines and compares the levels of perceived safety, pleasantness, and walkability of public open spaces in blocks with different local and configurational measurements, taking two Brazilian neighborhoods as a case study. Therefore, the objectives of this survey are: (1) to analyze walkability and perceived safety levels on blocks with different local measures; (2) to analyze walkability and pleasantness levels on blocks with different local measures; and (3) to analyze walkability and perceived safety levels on blocks with different configurational measures. To this end, the busiest blocks in each of the two neighborhoods were selected for the survey. Thus, the local measurements taken for the analyzes are the uses on the ground floors of the buildings, the alignment of the buildings relating to the sidewalks, the physical and visual permeabilities of the ground floors of the buildings, the presence of vegetation on the sidewalks and the width and characteristics of the sidewalks. In turn, the configurational measures considered for the analyzes are the measures of global and local (R5) integration, and global and local (R5) choice. The remaining data were collected through behavioral observation and questionnaires. Quantitative data were analyzed through non-parametric statistical tests and syntactic analyzes and qualitative data were analyzed through interpretations of meanings and frequencies. The results reveal that: (1) residential use has a positive impact on the perception of safety, while commercial use, set back buildings and higher visual and physical permeability have a negative impact on the perception of safety; (2) setback buildings have a negative impact on pleasantness; and (3) commercial use on the ground floor, aligned buildings, higher visual permeability rates and higher global choice values have a positive impact on walkability, while residential use and setback buildings have a negative impact on walkability. In turn, data relating to the presence of vegetation presented different results in each neighborhood. Furthermore, local measures proved to be better indicators of levels of walkability and perception of safety than configurational measures. In this way, it is expected that the results regarding local measures can contribute to the decision-making of architecture and urban planning professionals and in the development of urban legislation that values pedestrians and contributes to the safety, pleasantness, and walkability of public open spaces, as well as contributing to future work and walkability index.
Keywords: <\/strong>Walkability. User Perception. Open Public Space. Ground Floor Interfaces. Space syntax<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MEDIDAS LOCAIS E CONFIGURACIONAIS: EFEITOS PARA A CAMINHABILIDADE MARIA GOMES SEIBT Orientador e Presidente da BancaAnt\u00f4nio Tarc\u00edsio da Luz Reis (PROPUR\/UFRGS) Banca ExaminadoraProf.\u00aa Dr.\u00aa Andr\u00e9a Holz Pf\u00fctzenreuter (Examinadora Externa da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC)Prof.\u00aa Dr.\u00aa Fabiana Bugs Antocheviz (Examinadora Externa do Instituto Federal Farroupilha – IFFAR)Prof.\u00aa Dr.\u00aa […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_editorskit_title_hidden":false,"_editorskit_reading_time":0,"_editorskit_is_block_options_detached":false,"_editorskit_block_options_position":"{}","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,73,75],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-avisos","category-convite","category-dessertacao-tese"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7383"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7383\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7391,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7383\/revisions\/7391"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ufrgs.br\/propur\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}