-
postvaricella
purpura
fulminans is a rare disease in children that is
probably caused by
an acquired protein S deficiency resulting from
antiprotein S antibodies
after HHV-3
/
VZV
infection. The epitope of these antibodies are situated on
both the first
242 amino acids of protein S and the sex hormone binding
globulin-like
domain.
-
disseminated
intravascular
coagulopathy (DIC) / intravascular
coagulation-fibrinolysis (ICF)
Aetiology :
-
acute/subacute DIC :
-
infections :
-
obstetric complications :
-
hematological neoplasia
-
large tissue damage
-
burns
-
hyperthermia
-
cerebral trauma
-
crushing injury
-
rhabdomyolysis
-
chronic DIC :
Pathogenesis : excess of tissue
factor
in peripheral blood and systemic inflammation (IL-1, IL-6,
and TNF-a)
=> uncontrolled generation of thrombin => massive
systemic intravascular
activation of coagulation, leading to =>
-
widespread deposition of fibrin in the circulation which
can compromise
the blood supply to various organs, thus contributing to
multiple organ
failure
-
consumption of platelets and coagulation proteins
resulting from the ongoing
coagulation => severe bleedingref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,
ref6.
However, DIC is not a disease itself but is always secondary
to an underlying
disorderref1,
ref2.
In fact, a variety of clinical conditions may cause systemic
activation
of coagulation. Table 1 lists the diseases most frequently
associated with
DIC. Bacterial infections, in particular septicemia, are the
most common
clinical conditions associated with DIC. There is no
difference in the
incidence of DIC in patients with Gram-negative or
Gram-positive sepsis.
Systemic infections by other micro-organisms, such as
viruses and parasites,
may also lead to DIC. The generalized activation of
coagulation occurring
in these cases is mediated by cell membrane components of
micro-organisms
(lipopolysaccharide or endotoxin) or bacterial exotoxins,
such as staphylococcal
b
hemolysin, which cause a generalized inflammatory response
through the
activation of pro-inflammatory cytokinesref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5.
Severe trauma and burns are other conditions frequently
associated with
DICref1,
ref2.
Both solid and hematologic cancers may be associated with
DIC, which can
complicate up to 15% of cases of metastasized tumors or
acute leukemiaref1,
ref2,
ref3.
DIC is also a frequent complication (occurring in > 50%
of cases) of some
obstetric conditions such as abruptio placentae and amniotic
fluid embolismref1,
ref2.
Finally, selected vascular disorders, such as giant
hemangiomas and large
aortic aneurysms, and severe toxic or immunological
reactions (snake bites,
drugs, hemolytic transfusion reactions and transplant
rejection) can be
associated with DICref1,
ref2.
Most of the recent advances in our understanding ofthe
pathogenesis
of DIC are derived from studies in animal models and
humans with severe
sepsisref.
These studies have demonstrated that the systemic
formation of fibrin observed
in this setting is the result of the simultaneous
coexistence of 4 different
mechanisms: increased thrombin generation, a suppression
of the physiologic
anticoagulant pathways, impaired fibrinolysis and
activation of the inflammatory
pathwayref1,
ref2,
ref3.
The systemic generation of thrombin has been shown to be
mediated predominantlyby
the extrinsic (factor VIIa) pathway. In fact, while the
abrogation of the
tissue factor/factor VIIa pathway resulted in complete
inhibition of thrombin
generation in experimental animal models of endotoxemia,
the inhibition
of the contact system did not prevent systemic activation
of coagulationref1,
ref2.
Impaired function of physiological anticoagulant pathways
may amplify thrombin
generation and contribute to fibrin formationref.
Plasma levels of antithrombin are markedly reduced in
septic patients as
a result of a combination of increased consumption by the
ongoing formation
of thrombin, enzyme degradation by elastase released from
activated neutrophils,
impaired synthesis due to liver failure and vascular
capillary leakageref1,
ref2,
ref3.
Likewise, there may be significant depression of the
protein C system,
caused by enhanced consumption, impaired liver synthesis,
vascular leakage
and a down-regulation of thrombomodulin expression on
endothelial cells
by pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis
factor (TNF)-? and
interleukin(IL)-1?ref1,
ref2,
ref3.
Moreover, the evidence that administration of rTFPI
results in complete
inhibition of endotoxin-induced thrombin generation
suggests that tissue
factor is involved in the pathogenesis of DICref1,
ref2.
Although no acquired or deficiency or functional defect of
TFPI has been
identified in patients with DIC, there is evidence that
the inhibitor does
not regulate tissue factor activity sufficiently in such
patientsref.
As regards impaired fibrinolysis, experimental models of
bacteremia and
endotoxemia are characterized by rapidly increasing
fibrinolytic activity,
most probably due to the release of plasminogen activators
from endothelial
cells. However, this initialhyperfibrinolytic response is
followed by an
equally rapid suppression of fibrinolytic activity, due to
the increase
in plasma levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1
(PAI-1)ref1,
ref2
[Levi M, van der Poll T, de Jonge E, ten Cate H: Relative
insufficiency
of fibrinolysis in disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Sepsis 2000,
3:103-109]. The importance of PAI-1 in the pathogenesis of
DIC is further
demonstrated by the fact that a functional mutation in the
PAI-1 gene,
the 4G/5G polymorphism, which causes increased plasma
levels of PAI-1,
was linked to a worse clinical outcome in patients with
meningococcal septicemiaref.
Finally, another important mechanism in the pathogenesis
of DIC is the
parallel and concomitant activation of the inflammatory
cascade mediated
by activated coagulation proteins, which in turn can
stimulate endothelial
cells to synthesize pro-inflammatory cytokines. In fact,
while cytokines
and inflammatory mediators can induce coagulation,
thrombin and other serine
proteasesinteract with protease-activated receptors on
cell surfaces to
promote further activation and additional inflammationref.
Furthermore, since activated protein C has an
anti-inflammatory effect
through its inhibition of endotoxin-induced production of
TNF-?, IL-1?,
IL-6 and IL-8 by cultured monocytes/macrophages,
depression of the protein
C system may result in a pro-inflammatory stateref.
Thus, inflammatory and coagulation pathways interact with
each other in
a vicious circle which amplifies the response further and
leads to dysregulated
activation of systemic coagulation (van der Poll T, Buller
HR, ten Cate
H: Activation of coagulation after administration of tumor
necrosis factor
to normal subjects. N Eng J Med 1990, 322:1622-1627).
Table 2 summarizes
the most important mechanisms in the pathogenesis of DIC
in sepsis. However,
there is evidence that various events, including the
release of tissue
material (fat, phospholipids, cellular enzymes) into the
circulation, hemolysis
and endothelial damage may promote the systemic activation
of coagulation
in severe trauma and burns through a mechanism similar to
that observed
in septic patients (i.e., systemic activation of
cytokines)ref1,
ref2.
Nevertheless, there may also be specific variations in the
pathogenesis
if DIC due to different underlying disorders. For example,
in some patients
with cancer the initiation of coagulation activation is
not only due to
tissue factor expression on the surface of the malignant
cells but in this
case also involves a specific cancer procoagulant, a
cysteine protease
with factor X activating propertiesref.
Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia have a peculiar
form of DIC
characterized by a severe hyperfibrinolytic state
associated with systemic
activation of coagulationref.
The most common clinical manifestations of DIC are
bleeding, thrombosis
or both, often resulting in dysfunction of one or more
organsref
[Bick RL: Disseminated intravascular coagulation:
objective clinical and
laboratory diagnosis, treatment and assessment of
therapeutic response.
Semin Thromb Haemost 1996, 22:69-88]. A schematic
representation of the
clinical manifestations of coagulation abnormalities in
DIC is presented
in Figure 1. Since no single laboratory test or set of
tests is sensitive
or specific enough to allow a definite diagnosis of DIC,
in most cases
the diagnosis is based on the combination of results of
laboratory investigations
in a patient with a clinical condition known to be
associated with DICref1,
ref2.
The classical characteristic laboratory findings include
prolonged clotting
times (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin
time, thrombin
time), increased levels of fibrin-related markers (fibrin
degradation products
[FDP], D-dimers), low platelet count and fibrinogen levels
and low plasma
levels of coagulation factors (such as factors V and VII)
and coagulation
inhibitors (such as antithrombin and protein C)ref1,
ref2.
However, the sensitivity of plasma fibrinogen levels for
the diagnosis
of DIC is low, since fibrinogen acts as an acute-phase
reactant and its
levels are often within the normal range for a long period
of time. Thus,
hypofibrinogenemia is frequently detected only in very
severe cases of
DICref1,
ref2.
On the other hand, FDP and D-dimer levels have a low
specificity since
many other conditions, such as trauma, recent surgery,
inflammation or
venous thromboembolism, are associated with elevated
levels of these fibrin-related
markers. Other, more specialized and useful tests, not
available in all
laboratories, include the measurement of soluble fibrin
and assays of thrombin
generation, such as those to detect prothrombin activation
fragments F1+2
or thrombin-antithrombin complexesref1,
ref2.
However, serial coagulation tests may bemore helpful than
single laboratory
results in establishing the diagnosis of DIC. A scoring
system for the
diagnosis of DIC, developed from a previously described
set of diagnostic
criteriaref,
has been proposed by the Scientific Subcommittee on DIC of
the International
Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)ref1,
ref2.
This system consists of a 5-step diagnostic algorithm, in
which a specific
score, reflecting the severity of the abnormality found,
is given to each
of the following laboratory tests: platelet count (>100
× 109/L
= 0; <100 × 109/L = 1, <50 × 109/L
=
2), elevated fibrin-related markers (e.g. soluble fibrin
monomers/fibrin
degradation products) (no increase = 0; moderate increase
= 2; strong increase
= 3), prolonged prothrombin time (< 3 sec. = 0; > 3
sec. but < 6
sec. = 1; > 6 sec. = 2), fibrinogen level (> 1 g/L =
0; < 1 g/L = 1).
A total score of 5 or more is considered to be compatible
with DIC. According
to recent observations, the sensitivity and specificity of
this scoring
system are high (more than 90%)ref.
However, an essential condition for the use of this
algorithm is the presence
of an underlying disorder known to be associated with DICref.
Finally, a scoring system for diagnosing non-overt DIC has
recently been
proposed by the ISTH Scientific Subcommittee and validated
by Toh and Downey
who demonstrated its feasibility and prognostic relevanceref.
Treatment of DIC : the
heterogeneity of
the underlying disorders and of the clinical presentations
makes the therapeutic
approach to DIC particularly difficultref1,
ref2.
Thus, the management of DIC is based on the treatment of
the underlying
disease, supportive and replacement therapies and the
control of coagulation
mechanisms. The recent understanding of important
pathogenetic mechanisms
that may lead to DIC has resulted in novel preventive and
therapeutic approaches
to patients with DICref.
However, in spite of this progress, the therapeutic
decisions are still
controversial and should be individualized on the basis of
the nature of
DIC and the severity of the clinical symptomsref1,
ref2
[Riewald M, Riess H: Treatment options for clinically
recognized disseminated
intravascular coagulation. Semin Thromb Haemost 1998,
24:53-59]. The treatment
for DIC include replacement therapy, anticoagulants,
restoration of anticoagulant
pathways and other agentsref1,
ref2,
ref3.
Most of the clinical studies reported in the next
paragraphs were conducted
in patients with severe sepsisref1,
ref2,
a condition which usually leads to generalized activation
of coagulation
and thus represents an interesting model for the
development of new treatment
modalities.
-
a) Replacement therapy : the aim of replacement therapy
in DIC is to replace
the deficiency due to the consumptionof platelets,
coagulation factors
and inhibitors in order to prevent or arrest the
hemorrhagic episodes (Bick
RL: Disseminated intravascular coagulation: objective
clinical and laboratory
diagnosis, treatment and assessment of therapeutic
response. Semin Thromb
Haemost 1996, 22:69-88). Platelet concentrates and fresh
frozen plasma
(FFP) were, in the past, used very cautiously because of
the fear that
they might "feed the fire" and worsen thrombosis in
patients with active
DIC. However, this fear was not confirmed by clinical
practice and nowadays
replacement therapy is a mainstay of the treatment of
patients with significant
bleeding and coagulation parameters compatible with DIC.
Transfusion of
platelet concentrates at 1–2 U/10 Kg body weight should
be considered when
the platelet count is less than 20 × 109/L or
if there
is major bleeding and the platelet count is less than 50
× 109/L.
When there is significant DIC-associated bleeding and
fibrinogen levels
are below 100 mg/dL, the use of FFP, at a dose of 15–20
mL/Kg, is justified.
Alternatively, fibrinogen concentrates (total dose 2–3
g) or cryoprecipitates
(1 U/10 Kg body weight) may be administered. However,
FFP should be preferred
to specific coagulation factor concentrates since the
former contains all
coagulation factors and inhibitors deficient during
active DIC and lacks
traces of activated coagulation factors, which may
instead contaminate
the concentrates and exacerbate the coagulation
disorder.
-
b) Anticoagulants : the role of heparin in the treatment
of DIC remains
controversialref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5
[Hoyle CF, Swisky DM, Freedman L, Hayhoe GFJ: Beneficial
effect of heparin
in the management of patients with APL. Br J Hematol
1988, 68:283-289;
Sakuragawa N, Hasegawa H, Maki M, Nakagawa M, Nakashima
M: Clinical evaluation
of low-molecular-weight heparin (FR-860) on disseminated
intravascular
coagulation (DIC) – a multicenter co-operative double
blind trial in comparison
with heparin. Thromb Haemost 1993, 72:475-500; Majumdar
G: Idiopathic chronic
DIC controlled with low-molecular-weight heparin Blood
Coagul Fibrinol
1996, 7:97-98]. In fact, although from a theoretical
point of view interruption
of the coagulation cascade should be of benefit in
patients with active
DICref,
the clinical studies carried out so far have not been
conclusive and indeed
have often yielded contradictory resultsref.
However, on the basis of the few data available in the
literature, heparin
treatment is probably useful in patients with acute DIC
and predominant
thromboembolism, such as those with purpura fulminansref1,
ref2.
The use of heparin in chronic DIC is better established
and it has been
successfully employed in patients with chronic DIC
associated with those
diseases in which recurrent thrombosis predominates,
such as solid tumors,
hemangiomas, and dead fetus syndrome (Majumdar G:
Idiopathic chronic DIC
controlled with low-molecular-weight heparin. Blood
Coagul Fibrinol 1996,
7:97-98). The role of heparin in the treatment of DIC
associated with acute
promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is another controversy,
since some authors
support its use whereas other studies failed to
demonstrate its efficacyref1,
ref2
[Hoyle CF, Swisky DM, Freedman L, Hayhoe GFJ: Beneficial
effect of heparin
in the management of patients with APL. Br J Hematol
1988, 68:283-289].
However, the use of heparin in this setting has declined
in the last few
years thanks to the introduction of all-trans retinoic
acid therapy which
has led to the reduction of APL-associated coagulopathy.
Heparin is usually
given at relatively low doses (5–10 U/Kg of body weight
per hour) by continuous
intravenous infusion and may be switched to subcutaneous
injection for
long-term outpatient therapy (i.e. for those patients
with chronic DIC
associated with solid tumors). Alternatively,
low-molecular-weight heparin
may be used, as supported by the positive results in
both experimental
and clinical DIC studiesref1,
ref2
[Sakuragawa N, Hasegawa H, Maki M, Nakagawa M, Nakashima
M: Clinical evaluation
of low-molecular-weight heparin (FR-860) on disseminated
intravascular
coagulation (DIC) – a multicenter co-operative double
blind trial in comparison
with heparin. Thromb Haemost 1993, 72:475-500; Majumdar
G: Idiopathic chronic
DIC controlled with low-molecular-weight heparin. Blood
Coagul Fibrinol
1996, 7:97-98]. Experimental and clinical studies have
also shown the potential
role of danaparoid sodium, a low molecular weight
heparinoid, in the treatment
of DICref1,
ref2,
ref3.
A newer anticoagulant agent with direct thombin
inhibitory activity, recombinant
hirudin (r-hirudin)ref1,
ref2,
was recently shown to be effective in treating DIC in
animal studies, although
a study of the effect of this thrombin inhibitor in a
sheep model of lethal
endotoxemia showed no benefitref.
Preliminary experimental human studies proved that this
drug attenuated
endotoxin-induced coagulation activationref.
Since activation of the coagulation cascade during DIC
occurs predominantlythrough
the extrinsic pathway, theoretically the inhibition of
tissue factor should
block endotoxin-associated thrombin generationref.
In vivo experiments in baboon models of lethal DIC
showed that TFPI
is a potent inhibitor of sepsis-related mortalityref.
De Jonge and colleaguesref
first demonstrated in humans that recombinant TFPI
dose-dependently inhibits
coagulation activation during endotoxemia. Recombinant
TFPI was evaluated
in a phase II randomized trial in patients with severe
sepsisref.
Although the study did not have the statistical power to
demonstrate a
survival benefit, it did show a trend toward a reduction
in 28-day all-cause
mortality together with an improvement in organ
dysfunction in the group
of patients treated with the recombinant TFPI. No
evidence of a survival
advantage was observed in patients with severe sepsis
who received recombinant
TFPI in a recent phase III large clinical trialref.
Inhibition of the tissue factor/factor VIIa pathway is
an another strategy
that has been explored. Moons and colleagues
demonstrated the efficacy
of recombinant nematode anticoagulant protein c2
(NaPc2), a potent and
specific inhibitor of the ternary complex between tissue
factor/factor
VIIa and factor Xa, in inhibiting coagulation activation
in a primate model
of sepsisref.
Other authors have experimented with anti-tissue
factor/factor VIIa antibodies
in animal models with promising resultsref.
-
c) Restoration of anticoagulant pathways : since
patients with active DIC
have an acquired deficiency of coagulation inhibitors,
restoration of the
physiologic anticoagulation pathways seems to be an
appropriate aim of
the treatment of DICref.
Considering that antithrombin (AT) is the primary
inhibitor of circulating
thrombin, its use in DIC is certainly rationalref.
Recent studies in animals and humans with severe sepsis
have demonstrated
that antithrombin also has anti-inflammatory properties
(reduction of C-reactive
protein and IL-6 levels), which may further justify its
utilization during
DICref
[Okajima K, Uchiba M: The anti-inflammatory properties
of anti-thrombin
III: new therapeutic implications. Semin Thromb Haemost
1998, 24:27-32].
The administration of antithrombin concentrates infused
at supraphysiologic
concentrations was shown to reduce sepsis-related
mortality in animal modelsref.
Several small clinical trials have been conducted in
humans, mostly in
patients with sepsis-related DIC, and have shown
beneficial effects in
terms of improvement of coagulation parameters and organ
functionref1,
ref2.
An Italian multicenter, randomized, double-blind study
conducted in 1998
by Baudo et al.ref,
evaluating the role of antithrombin in patients with
sepsis or post-surgical
complications, showed a net beneficial effect on
survival in those patients
receiving the concentrate. These findings were confirmed
in 1999 by Levi
et al. in their meta-analysis of all so far published
human clinical trials
of antithrombin treatment of DICref.
By contrast, a large randomized, controlled multicenter
trial of supraphysiologic
doses of AT concentrates conducted in 2144 patients with
sepsis and DIC
did not show a beneficial effect of antithrombin
treatmentref.
However, a retrospective analysis of the same trial
showed that the subgroup
of patients who did not receive concomitant heparin had
a potential benefit
from antithrombin III in terms of mortality reductionref.
Based on the fact that the protein C system is impaired
during DIC some
authors have investigated the therapeutic efficacy of
exogenous administration
of this protein in patients with DICref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,
ref6,
ref7,
ref8,
ref9,
ref10,
ref11,
ref12
[Bernard GR, Hartman DL, Helterbrand JD, Fisher CJ:
Recombinant human activated
protein C (rhAPC) produces a trend toward improvement in
morbidity and
28-day survival in patients with severe sepsis. Crit
Care Med 1998, 27:S4].
The infusion of activated protein C (APC) concentrates
was shown to prevent
DIC and mortality in an animal model of sepsisref.
A study conducted in 1998 on patients with severe sepsis
suggested a trend
toward improved survival in the group treated with APC
[Bernard GR, Hartman
DL, Helterbrand JD, Fisher CJ: Recombinant human
activated protein C (rhAPC)
produces a trend toward improvement in morbidity and
28-day survival in
patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 1998, 27:S4].
In a dose-ranging
clinical trial, 131 patients with sepsis received
recombinant human APC
by continuous infusion at doses ranging from 12 mg/Kg/hour
to 30 mg/Kg/hour or placeboref.
A 40% reduction in mortality was observed in those
patients who received
the higher doses of activated protein C. Similarly,
another recent multicenter
clinical trialref
determined that treatment with recombinant human APC,
given intravenously
at a dose of 24 mg/Kg of
body weight per hour,
significantly reduced mortality in patients with severe
sepsis, in spite
of a higher rate of serious bleeding in the APC-treated
group. A double-blind
randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of APC
and unfractionated
heparin in the treatment of DIC and concluded that the
former improved
DIC, and finally the survival, more efficiently than did
heparinref.
The recently published results of the trial conducted by
the Human Recombinant
Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Sepsis
(PROWESS) Study Group
showed a significant reduction in 28-day mortality and a
quicker resolution
of organ dysfunction in the group of patients with
severe sepsis treated
with APCref1,
ref2.
These results were confirmed by the ENHANCE trial which
also suggested
that recombinant APC might be more effective is therapy
is started earlierref.
By contrast, a very recent trial on 2640 patients with
severe sepsis and
a low risk of death (defined by an APACHE II score
<25 or single organ
failure) did not find a statistically significant
difference in 28-day
mortality rate between the placebo and APC-treated
groupsref,
suggesting that APC is of benefit only in patients at
high risk of death
from sepsis.Ongoing studies are focusing on the
concomitant use of heparin
in patients with DIC who receive activated protein Cref.
-
d) Other agents : recombinant factor VII activated
(rFVIIa) may be used
in patients with severe bleeding who are not responsive
to other treatment
options. Bolus doses of 60–120 ?g/Kg, possibly repeated
after 2–6 hours,
have been found to be effective in controlling
refractory hemorrhagic episodes
associated with DICref1,
ref2.
Antifibrinolytic agents, such as epsilon-aminocaproic
acid or tranexamic
acid, given intravenously at a dose of 10–15 mg/Kg/h,
are occasionally
used in patients resistant to replacement therapy who
are bleeding profusely
or in patients with disease states associated with
intense fibrinolysis
(prostate cancer, Kasabach-Merrit syndrome, acute
promyelocytic leukemia)ref.
However, since these agents are very effective in
blocking fibrinolysis,
they should not be administered unless heparin has been
previously infused
in order to block the prothrombotic component of DIC.
The use of these
drugs in APL has declined in the last few years, given
the efficacy of
all-trans-retinoic-acid in preventing the
majority of the hemorrhagic
complications of this malignancyref.
The advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology
of DIC have resulted
in novel preventive and therapeutic approaches to this
disease. Based on
the fact that tissue inflammation is a fundamental
mechanism in DIC associated
with sepsis or major trauma, some researchers have
successfully employed
the combined blockade of leukocyte/platelet adhesion and
coagulation in
a murine model by using antiselectin antibodies and
heparin and have suggested
the potential clinical use of such a strategyref.
Based on the same rationale, other researchers have
demonstrated that the
administration of recombinant IL-10, an
anti-inflammatory cytokine which
may modulate the activation of coagulation, completely
abrogated endotoxin-induced
effects on coagulation in humansref.
By contrast, the use of monoclonal antibodies against
tumor necrosis factor
has shown disappointing or at best modest results in
septic patientsref1,
ref2,
ref3.
More recently, Branger and colleaguesref
found that an inhibitor of p38 MAPK, an important
component of intracellular
signaling cascades that mediate the inflammatory
response to infectious
and non-infectious stimuli, attenuated the activation of
coagulation, fibrinolysis
and endothelial cells during human endotoxemia. Finally,
although studies
using antibodies against the receptor for bacterial
endotoxins (CD14) produced
positive resultsref,
other studies using endotoxin antibodies failed to
improve outcomeref1,
ref2.
Symptoms & signs : skin and
mucous hemorrhages,
shock, metabolic acidosis, ARDS, MOF, thromboses in subacute
DIC
Laboratory examinations :
-
no hemolysis
-
reduced antithrombin and protein C
-
[fibrinogen]plasma may initially appear
normal because it is
an APP
-
all other [coagulation factors]plasma are
decreased
-
enlengthening of both aPTT and INR is due also to
inhibition by FDPs
-
paracoagulation test (protamine sulfate or ethanol
tests) shows circulating
fibrin monomers
Differential diagnosis :
|
acute DIC
|
chronic DIC
|
primary
fibrinolysis
|
TTP
|
chronic
hepatitis
|
incidence |
common |
common |
very rare |
rare |
common |
INR |
very increased |
normal or increased |
increased |
normal |
normal or increased |
aPTT |
very increased |
normal or increased |
increased |
normal |
normal or increased |
fibrinogen |
very reduced |
normal (compensated by chronic inflammation) or
reduced |
very reduced |
normal |
reduced, normal or increased |
factor VIII |
reduced |
normal or reduced |
normal or reduced |
normal |
normal |
antithrombin
III |
reduced |
normal or reduced |
reduced |
normal |
reduced |
euglobulin lysis time |
normal or reduced |
normal or reduced |
very reduced |
normal |
normal |
plasminogen |
reduced |
reduced |
very reduced |
normal |
normal or reduced |
D-dimer |
+++ (> 2,000 mg/ml) |
+ |
+/- |
+/- |
+/- |
other FDP |
+++ |
+ |
++++ |
|
+/- |
platelets |
very reduced |
normal or reduced (other than in acute
promyelocytic
leukemia
with hyperfibrinolysis) |
normal |
very reduced |
normal or reduced |
RBC alterations |
schistocytosis |
mild schistocytosis |
- |
marked schistocytosis |
frequent macrocytosis |
Other D-dimer elevation : surgery, reabsorbing hematomas,
deep venous thrombosis,
pulmonary thrombembolism, liver cirrhosis, renal failure
FDP >15 mg/mL is the most
effective to differentiate
leukemia-associated DIC from non-DIC, resulting in
diagnostic sensitivity
and specificity of 92% and 96%, respectivelyref.
Therapy :
-
heparin
(in purpura fulminans or limb ischemia : i.v. infusion
300-500 U/hr) until
increase in platelet.
-
antifibrinolytic
drugs
in bleeding patients
-
replacement therapy
-
platelet concentrates
(until > 20,000/ml; >
30,000/ml
if active bleeding)
-
fresh
frozen
plasma
(15-20 ml/kg until fibrinogen > 100 mg/dl); if
uneffective => fibrinogen
concentrates (2-3 g), which unfortunately contain also
activated coagulation
factors and do not contain natural coagulation
inhibitors
-
antihrombin
III
? : high-dose AT without concomitant heparin in septic
patients with DIC
may result in a significant mortality reductionref
-
rHu-APC
?
-
gabexate mesilateref
-
tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) ?