Table of contents :
Pathogenesis :
Clinical course :
|
|
|
|
|
alkylating agents![]() |
del(5q), -5, del(7q), -7 | 3–10 years (5-7) | poor | chlorambucil, BCNU, CCNU, Cytoxan |
DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors | They usually have no preleukemic phase, and showed normal karyotype or cytogenetic rearrangements specific to de novo AMLref. 11q23 and 21q22 rearrangements predominated, whereas t(8;21), inv(16), and t(15;17) (which is characteristic of acute promyelocytic leukaemiaref) were less often seen, and other rearrangements were rarely observedref1, ref2. | 6 months-5 years | poor | epipodophyllotoxins such as etoposide![]() ![]() |
various agents | t(15;17), inv(16) | 2-3 years | good | bimolane |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
CR |
|
|
48-mo OS |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AML M0 | +/- | + | + | usually + | +/- | often + | usually - | usually - | usually - |
AML M1 | +/- | + | usually + | usually + | + | often + | usually - | +/- | usually - |
AML M2 | - | + | usually - | + | + | + | + | +/- | usually - |
AML M3 | - | - | - | + | + | +/- | +/- | usually - | usually - |
AML M4 | usually - | + | +/- | usually + | + | +/- | + | + | often + |
AML M5 | usually - | + | +/- | +/- | + | +/- | + | + | often + |
AML M6 | - | +/- | +/- | +/- | +/- | + | usually - | +/- | normally - |
AML M7 | - | usually + | usually + | usually - | +/- | often + | usually - | - | - |
overall AML | + in 10-20% | + in 70% | + in 30-40% | + in 60-90% | in 70-90% | + in 60-70% | + in 40-70% | + in 50-60% | + in 15-40% |
|
|
|
ANAE | 100% | 83% |
ANBE | 60% | 17% |
CD13 | 30% | 100% |
CD33 | 30% | 100% |
|
|
|
|
mitoxantrone![]() etoposide ![]() |
61 | 43% | 1988 |
mitoxantrone![]() etoposide ![]() cytarabine ![]() +/- PSC-833 |
37 | 32% | 1999 |
mitoxantrone![]() etoposide ![]() cytarabine ![]() GM-CSF ![]() |
22 | 30% | 1993 |
idarubicin![]() cytarabine ![]() |
21 | 52% | 1996 |
aclarubicin![]() etoposide ![]() |
34 | 29% | 1998 |
idarubicin![]() cytarabine ![]() |
23 refractory
38 relapsed |
52%
68% |
1997 |
2-chlorodeoxyadenosine![]() ![]() |
19 | 0% (100% of treated patients had improvement) | 1998 |
topotecan![]() cytarabine ![]() |
53 refractory | 4% (39% of treated patients had improvement) | 1997 |
carboplatin![]() cytarabine ![]() |
31 | 29% | 1999 |
cyclophosphamide![]() etoposide ![]() carboplatin ![]() cytarabine ![]() |
25 | 12% | 1998 |
|
|
|
|
||
consolidation (CR1) | cytogenetic risk t(15;17) | no role | no role | no role | no role |
t(8;21)inv(16) | 5-yr DFS 60-80% (because of high salvage rate and long-term sequelae,
many would reserve autologous HCT for relapse for patients with favorable
cytogenetics)
TRM 4-8% |
5-yr DFS 65%
TRM 18% = No Role |
no role | no role | |
intermediate | 5-yr DFS 42-55%
TRM 4-6% |
5-yr DFS 48-62%
TRM 16-20% |
insufficient data for
nonmyeloablative |
||
poor | 5-yr DFS 18-25%
TRM 4-8% |
5-yr DFS 35-45%
TRM 18-20% |
5-yr DFS 30-40%
TRM 30% |
reduced intensity 5-yr DFS 50%
for older AML CR1 at 2 yr |
|
salvage | CR2 | 5-yr DFS 30% overall
5-yr DFS 60-80% for t(15;17) |
5-yr DFS 40% | Pediatric 40%
Adult 5-yr DFS 30% TRM 30% |
2-yr DF S 40-50%reduced
intensity |
relapse | not an option unless
"back-up" product from CR1 available |
5-yr DFS 20-30% | Pediatric 5-yr DFS 20%
10-15% |
2-yr DFS 10-30%
Adult 5-yr DFS depending on the volume of residual disease |
|
induction failure | no role | 3-yr DFS 30-40% (3 yrs)
(20% for untreated secondary AML) |
5-yr DFS 20-30% (most of these patients represent patients with high grade myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in which an unrelated donor search was initiated prior to leukemic evolution) | 1-yr DFS 15-30% (sibling) |
|
|
|
favorable | repeat cycles of high-dose araC +/- additional drug | optimum dose, schedule, number of cycles unknown
3-4 cycles better than 1 cycleref1, ref2, ref3, ref4 2 cycles + anthracycline or anthracenedione or other intense therapy may be as effectiveref1, ref2 1 cycle of high-dose araC effective in MRC AML14ref autologous HSCT not better than high-dose araC-based therapyref allogeneic HSCT not better than high-dose araC-based therapyref1, ref2, ref3 |
intermediate | repetitive cycle of high-dose araC +/- additional therapy | optimum dose, schedule, number of cycles unknown
multiagent chemotherapy not better than high-dose araC aloneref autologous HSCT not better than high-dose araC-based therapyref1, ref2, ref3 allogeneic HSCT not better than high-dose araC-based therapyref1, ref2, ref3 discordant data for allogeneic HSCT in the FLT3 ITD groupref1, ref2 |
adverse | allogeneic HSCT | dismal outcome after intense chemotherapyref1,
ref2,
ref3
dismal outcome after autologous HSCTref1, ref2, ref3 allogeneic HSCT may improve outcomeref1, ref2 experimental conditioning protocols under studyref1, ref2, ref3 consider new drugs (non-transplant approaches) |
|
patients (in general, older AML patients are defined as 60 years of age; younger AML patients as < 60 years of age.) |
patients |
|
population incidence (new diagnoses, per 100,000 US citizens per year. Older/younger division occurs at 65 years) | 17.6 | 1.8 | |
favorable cytogenetics : the rare older patient fortunate enough to have good-risk cytogenetic abnormalities may have a survival advantage over other older patientsref1, ref2, though it is not clear that this finding holds for patients older than 65 years. | t(8;21) | 2% | 9% |
inv 16 or t(16;16) | 1-3% | 10% | |
t(15;17) | 4% | 6-12% | |
unfavorable cytogeneticsref1, ref2, ref3 | -7 | 8-9% | 3% |
+8 | 6-10% | 4% | |
complex | 18% | 7% | |
ABCB1 / MDR1![]() |
71% | 35% | |
secondary AML (mostly post-myelodysplastic
syndrome (MDS)![]() |
24-56% | 8% | |
TRM (rates following remission-induction therapy with an anthracycline- or anthracenedione-based regimen) | 25-30% | 5-10% | |
CR (rates following remission-induction therapy with an anthracycline- or anthracenedione-based regimen) | 38-62% | 65-73% | |
long-term survival (percentages rounded to nearest whole number) | 5-15% | 30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
compare anthracyclines and anthracenediones | Lowenberg, 1998ref | mitoxantrone (8 mg/m2/d) +
Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100 mg/m2/d) vs. daunorubicin (30 mg/m2/d) + Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100 mg/m2/d) |
47%
vs. 38% P = 0.07 |
39 weeks (median)
9% (5 years) vs. 36 weeks (median) 6% (5 years) P = 0.23 |
Early and post-induction death rates were similar for both arms. Patients
receiving mitoxantrone had a significantly higher rate of severe infections (25.1% vs 18.6%) and a trend toward a longer duration of aplasia (22 vs 19 days). |
AML Collaborative
Group, 1998ref |
idarubicin (8-20 mg/m2/d) +
Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100-200 mg/m2/d) vs. daunorubicin (45-50 mg/m2/d) + Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100-200 mg/m2/d) |
51%
vs. 46% P = not done |
33.6 weeks (median)
vs. 29.9 weeks (median) P = 0.58 |
Early induction failure tended to be higher with idarubicin, while
late induction failure
was lower. Myelosuppression was greater in patients receiving idarubicin |
|
Archimbaud, 1999ref | idarubicin (8 mg/m2/d) +
Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100 mg/m2/d) + etoposide (100 mg/m2/d) vs. mitoxantrone (7 mg/m2/d) + Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100-200 mg/m2/d)+ E (100 mg/m2/d) |
45%
vs. 50% P = 0.52 |
7 months (median)
21% (2 years) vs. 7 months (median) 21% (2 years) P = not done |
No difference between groups in degree of myelosuppression or in early death rates. | |
vary 7+3 dose | Buchner T, Hiddemann W, Wormann B, et al. Daunorubicin 60 instead of 30 mg/sqm improves response and survival in elderly patients with AML [abstract]. Blood. 1997;90:583a | daunorubicin (60 mg/m2/d) +
Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100 mg/m2/d) vs. daunorubicin (30 mg/m2/d) + Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100 mg/m2/d) |
54%
vs. 42% P = 0.038 |
16% (5 years)
vs. 10% (5 years) P = 0.11 |
The 30 mg daunorubicin arm was closed
prematurely due to higher response rates in the 60 mg arm, resulting in 42 patients receiving lower dose daunorubicin, and 130 patients receiving the higher dose. |
Dillman, 1991ref | daunorubicin (45 mg/m2/d) +
Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100 mg/m2/d) vs. daunorubicin (45 mg/m2/d) + Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (200 mg/m2/d) |
44%
vs. 38% P = 0.68 |
11.0 weeks (median)
vs. 9.6 weeks (median) P = 0.23 |
This study has short OS times compared to other studies in this patient population | |
add agents | Goldstone, 2001ref | daunorubicin (50 mg/m2/d) +
Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100 mg/m2 q 12 hours)+ thioguanine (100 mg/m2 q 12 hours) vs. daunorubicin (50 mg/m2/d) + Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100 mg/m2 q 12 hours) + etoposide (100 mg/m2/d) vs. mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2/d) + Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100 mg/m2/d |
62%
vs. 50% P = 0.002 (for comparison of DAT to ADE) vs. 55% P = 0.04 (for comparison of DAT to MAC) |
12% (5 years)
vs. 8% (5 years) P = 0.02 (for comparison of DAT to ADE) vs. 10% (5 years) P = 0.1 (for comparison of DAT to MAC, 0.2 (for comparison of ADE to MAC |
There were no significant differences in myelosuppression or other
toxicities,
neutrophils were slower to recover in the mitoxantrone arm. Patients receiving ADE had higher rates of induction death (26% compared to 16% for DAT and 17% for MAC) |
Baer, 2002ref | daunorubicin (60 mg/m2/d) +
Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100 mg/m2/d)+ etoposide (100 mg/m2/d) vs. daunorubicin (40 mg/m2/d) + Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (100 mg/m2/d) + etoposide (60 mg/m2/d) + PSC-833 (10 mg/kg/d) |
46%
vs. 39% P = 0.008 |
7 months (median)
vs. 2 months (median) P = 0.48 |
Because of concern about excessive
mortality on the ADEP arm (25 deaths vs 12 on the ADE arm), it was closed early to to further accrual. Survival between the 2 arms was similar at 1 year |
|
use hematopoietic growth factors | Stone, 1995ref | daunorubicin (45 mg/m2/d) +
Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (200 mg/m2/d) vs. daunorubicin (45 mg/m2/d) + Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (200 mg/m2/d) + GM-CSF (5 µg/kg/d) |
54%
vs. 51% P = 0.61 |
10.8 months
(median) vs. 8.4 months (median) P = 0.10 |
Median duration of neutropenia was 15
days in the GM-CSF arm and 17 days in placebo arm (P = 0.02). The duration of hospitalization did not differ between the arms; nor did the rates of life-threatening infection, or persistent leukemia. |
Godwin, 1998ref | daunorubicin (45 mg/m2/d) +
Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (200 mg/m2/d) vs. daunorubicin (45 mg/m2/d) + Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside) (200 mg/m2/d) + G-CSF |
50%
vs. 41% P = 0.89 |
9 months
(median) vs. 6 months (median) P = 0.71 |
The duration of neutropenia was 15% shorter in the G-CSF arm compared
to the
placebo arm (P = 0.14). The duration of hospitalization did not differ between the arms; nor did the rates of life-threatening infection, or persistent leukemia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECOGref136 | >= 56 | 234 | 7-8 months | 20% | 41% | 19% | results same with daunorubicin, idarubicin, or mitoxantrone and +/- GM-CSF priming |
MRC (AML11)ref | >= 56 | 1314 | 12 months | 25% | 62% | 16% | results same with 1-4 courses post-CR and +/- G-CSF starting 8 days after end of induction |
SWOGref | >= 56 | 161 | 9 months | 19% | 43% | 15% | survival worse with mitoxantrone + etoposide |
HOVONref | >= 60 | 211 | 10 months | 25% | 48% | 15% | results same +/- PSC-833 |
MD Andersonref | >= 65 | 31 | 12 months | 20% | 48% | ... | cytarabine at 1.5 g/m2 daily x 3; survival worse with single agent gemtuzumab |
US Intergroup | APL: ATRA/daunorubicin/ara-C induction, followed by As2O3
+ daunorubicin/ATRA x 2 vs daunorubicin/
ATRA x 2 consolidation, followed by ATRA/6MP/methotrexate vs ATRA x 1 yr for maintenance. AML (age > 70 years and not a candidate for chemotherapy): oral tipifarnib (R115777) at 2 doses and 2 schedules |
CALGB | AML (age > 60): dauno/ara-C vs dauno/ara-C/oblimersen
AML (age < 60): dauno/ara-C/etoposide, followed by post-chemotherapy/PBSCT, followed by IL-2 vs observation |
ECOG | AML (age > 60): dauno/ara-C ± MDR modulator (LY335979)
AML (age < 60): daunorubicin (45 mg/m2 x 3 d)/ara-C vs daunorubicin (90 mg/m2 x 3 d)/ara-C, followed by ± gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) prior to autoPBSCT (if no sib donor) |
SWOG | AML (age > 55): continuous infusion daunorubicin/ara-C ± cyclosporine
A followed by assignment to mini-allo BMT
(if HLA-matched sibling donor) AML (age < 55): daunorubicin/ara-C vs daunorubicin/ara-C + GO |
EORTC | AML (age > 60): ida/ara-C vs ida/ara-C/GO
AML (age < 60): ida/ara-C vs ida/high dose ara-C, followed by intensive consolidation/allogeneic BMT, followed by IL-2 |
HOVON | AML (age > 60): dauno (45 mg/m2)/ara-C vs dauno (90 mg/m2)/ara-C
f/b intermediate dose ara-C,
followed by GO x 4 vs observation AML (age < 60): ida/ara-C ± G-CSF vs ida/high-dose ara-C ± G-CSF, followed by mitoxantrone/etoposide (good risk) or Mito/etop vs autoBMT or alloBMT (if sibling donor) |
MRC | APL: ATRA/dauno/high-dose ara-C/6-thioguanine (MRC) vs ATRA/ida (Spanish),
followed by MRC or Spanish
chemo ± GO AML (age > 60): intensive chemo (dauno/ara-c at various doses) vs non-intensive chemo (hydroxyurea/low dose ara-C ± ATRA) AML (age < 60): dauno/high dose ara-C/6-thioguanine vs fludarabine ![]() allo BMT (if sibling; and will be nonmyeloablative if > 50, "full" if under 35 years old) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PKC-412 | benzoylstaurosporine | PKC
PDGFR KDR KIT FLT3 ABL |
528 nM | phase II: AML with/without FLT3-ITD
In FLT 3 mut pts (n = 20), 35% significant reduction in blast countref |
nausea,
emesis, fatigue |
CEP-701 | indolocarbazole | FLT3
TRKA KDR PKC PDGFR EGFR |
2-3 nM | phase II: AML with FLT3-ITD
Several pts had reduced blast counts, autophosphorylation inhibitedref |
nausea,
emesis, fatigue |
MLN-518 | piperazinyl quinazoline | KIT
PDGFR FLT3 FMS |
170-220 nM | phase I: AML/MDS with/without
FLT3-ITD phase II: AML with FLT3-ITD A few pts with FLT3 ITD treated at higher doses had biological response (DeAngelo D, Stone RM, Bruner RJ, et al. Phase I clincal results with MLN518, a novel FLT3 antagonist: tolerability. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics [abstract]. Blood. 2003;102:65a) |
generalized
weakness, fatigue, nausea and vomiting |
SU5416 | indolinone | FLT3
KDR KIT |
250 nM | phase II: refractory
AML/MDS/MPD/MM Phase II: Refractory AML (c-KIT positive). No responses in FLT3 ITD ptsref. |
fatigue,
nausea, sepsis and bone pain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTI inhibitor | tipifarnib | 170 untreated | median 73 | 18% | 16% | median 5.6 months | 159ref |
FLT3 inihibitor | PKC412 | 20 relapsed/refractory | > 65 | 5% | 35-70% | not stated | 160ref |
CEP701 | 14 relapsed | 0% | 36% | not stated | 161ref | ||
24 untreated, not considered fit for more standard therapy | 0% | 32% | not stated | 162ref | |||
proteasome inhibitors | bortezomib (+ idarubicin and cytarabine) | 12 untreated and relapsed | > 30 | 33% | 42% | not stated | 163ref |
hypomethylating agent | decitabine | 36 with MDS | .. | 28% | 59% | moratality rate at 8 weeks 7% vs. 26% with AML-type therapy | 164ref |
decitabine + ATRA | 29 not eligible for standard induction for untrated AML | > 60 | 14% | 17% | median 7.5 months | 165ref | |
nucleoside analogue | clofarabine | 28 untreated | > 70 (>60 and unfit for standard therapy) | 59% | 11% | 19% induction mortality rate | 166ref |
alkylating agent | cloretazine | 28 relapsed/refractory | 4% | not given | median survival 9 weeks | 167ref | |
enhancer of apoptosis | Bcl-2 antisense (oblimersen sodium) (+ daunorubicin and cytarabine) | 29 untreated | > 60 | 48% | 10% | not stated | 168ref |
P glycoprotein inhibitor | zosuquidar (+ daunorubicin and cytarabine) | 16 untreated and relapsed | ... | 69% | 6% | median 18 months | 169ref |
anti-CD33 antibody attached to toxin | GO (+ daunorubicin and cytarabine) | 64 untreated | < 60 | 84% | - | 80% alive with median follow-up 8 months | 170ref |
GO (+ daunorubicin and cytarabine) | 53 untreated | < 60 | 83% | ... | 68% alive with median follow-up 9 months | 171ref | |
GO (+ cytarabine) | 21 | > 60 | 43% | ... | 48% alive with median follow-up 7 months |
Prognosis : broadly speaking, prognostic factors can be divided into
|
|
|
|
t(8;21) | KIT exon 8 mutation | 2% | ref21 |
KIT codon 816 mutation | 11% | ref1, ref221, 25 | |
FLT3 ITD or D835 mutation | 6-11% | ref1, ref221, 25 | |
inv(16)/t(16;16) (?70% of inv(16) leukaemias have mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase or RAS genes.23) | KIT exon 8 mutation | 24-26% | ref1, ref221,23 |
KIT codon 816 mutation | 7-8% | ref1, ref221,23 | |
FLT3 ITD or D835 mutation | 8% | ref1, ref221,23 | |
NRAS mutation | 18-26% | ref1, ref223,28 | |
KRAS mutation | 9-17% | ref1, ref223,28 | |
normal karyotype | FLT3 ITD | 28-34% | ref1, ref2, ref3, ref473-76 |
FLT3 TKD mutation | 11-14% | ref1, ref274,75 | |
NPM1 mutation | 48-64% | ref1, ref279-83 | |
CEBPA mutation | 15-18% | ref1, ref287,99 | |
MLL1 PTD | 8-11% | ref1, ref289,90 | |
NRAS mutation | 14% | ref28 | |
KRAS mutation | 4% | ref28 BAALC | |
gene overexpression | ... | ... | ref98 |
t(6;9) | FLT3 ITD | 90% (prevalence based on few cases) | ref75 |
+11 | MLL PTD | 91% (prevalence based on few cases) | ref94 |
+21 | RUNX1 mutation | 38% (prevalence based on few cases) | ref92 |
del(9q) | CEBPA mutation | 41% | ref93 |
|
|
|
age < 60 yrs | 75% | 35-40% |
age > 60 yrs | 45-55% | < 20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
early treatment assessment | 7-10 days after therapy | NA | NA | < 5 | |
morphologic leukemia-free state | varies by protocol | NA | NA | < 5 | flow cytometry extramedullary disease |
morphologic CR | varies by protocol | > 1,000 | > 100,000 | < 5 | transfusion extramedullary disease |
cytogenetic CR | varies by protocol | > 1,000 | > 100,000 | < 5 | cytogenetics-normal, extramedullary disease |
molecular CR | varies by protocol | > 1,000 | > 100,000 | < 5 | molecular-negative, extramedullary disease |
partial remission | varies by protocol | > 1,000 | > 100,000 | > 50 or decrease to 5-25 | blasts < 5% if Auer rod positive |
|
|
resistant disease | patient survives >= 7 days post-CT; persistent AML in blood or bone marrow |
aplasia | patients survives >= 7 days post-CT; death while cytopenic, with aplastic bone marrow |
indeterminate cause | patients who die < 7 days posttherapy
patients who die > 7 days posttherapy with no PB blasts, but no bone marrow examination patents who do not complete the first course of therapy |
morphologic relapse | reappearance of blasts post-CR in PB or bone marrow |
molecular of cytogenetic relapse | reappearance of molecular or cytogenetic abnormality |
|
|
|
|
overall survival | all patiets | entry onto trial | death from any cause |
relapse-free survival | CR | leukemia-free state | disease relapse or patient death from any cause |
event-free survival | all patients (under circumstances where presentation of EFSmay be appropriate for responders only, this point should be clearly stated) | entry onto trial | treatment failure, disease relapse, or patient death from any cause |
remission duration | CR | date of CR | disease relapse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
El-Kassarref | 26 | 29-81 | no separation | allele ratios | 80% | 10 | 1/16 | 3/16 | 9/16 | 5/23 | NA |
Championref | 8 | 60-88 | magnetic beads | Asimakopoulos equation | > 50% (Rg < 0.33 and Rt = 1.0) | 0 | NA | 26/41 | 1/41 | 15/65 | NA |
El-Kassarref | 17 | 13-70 | magnetic beads | allele ratios | 80% | 0 | 11/17 | 9/17 | 4/17 | 4/44 | 5/9 clonal
2/4 polyclonal |
El-Kassarref | 53 | 13-80 | magnetic beads | allele ratios | 80% | 4 | 18/30 | 31/49 | 5/49 | NA | not conclusive |
Harrisonref | 43 | 11-89 | magnetic beads | allele ratios | 80% | 0 | NA | 10/43 | 20/43 | 0/9 | 6/10 clonal
2/13 polyclonal |
Mitterbauerref | 23 | 27-88 | NA | allele ratios | 75% (allele ratio > 3:1) | 3 | NA | 17/20 | 0/20 | 22/242 | NA |
Chiusoloref | 40 | 20-63 | magnetic beads | allele ratios | 75% (allele ratio > 3:1) | 0 | 34/40 | 17/40 | 8/40 | NA | 7/17 clonal
1/15 polyclonal |
Shihref | 73 | 18-92 | RBC rosetting | Asimakopoulos equation | > 50% (Rg < 0.33 and Rt = 1.0) | 9 | NA | 42/64 | 10/64 | 12/43 | NA |
Shihref | 89 | 15-92 | RBC rosetting | Asimakopoulos equation | > 50% (Rg < 0.33 and Rt = 1.0) | 10 | NA | 54/79 | 10/79 | NA | 25/45 clonal
1/15 polyclonal |
Zamoraref | 44 | 32-91 | magnetic beads | allele ratios | 75% (allele ratio > 3:1) | 6 | 21/44 | 11/38 | 7/38 | 3/64 | 3/11 clonal
4/20 polyclonal |
|
|
|
|
age | < 40 | 40-60 | > 60 |
platelet count | < 1,000 | 1,000-1,500 | > 1,500 |
previous thrombosis/hemorrhage | no | no | yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thalidomide (143) | 45% | 30% | 18% | 55% | 42% | 24% |
low-dose thalidomide and prednisone (21) | 5% | 62% | 19% | 58% | NR | 14% |
lenalidomide (68) | 44% | 22% | 7% | 50% | 66% | 16% |
IWG-MMM | IWG-MDS | EUMNET-MMM | ||||
Response category | Peripheral blood | Bone marrow | Peripheral blood | Bone marrow | Peripheral blood | Bone marrow |
Complete remission (CR) | Hgb > 110 g/L
Platelets> 100 x 109/L Neutrophils > 1.0 x 109/L All counts < upper normal limit No blasts or immature cells |
Blasts < 5%
Fibrosis grade < 1 Normocellular |
Hgb > 110 g/L
Platelets > 100 x 109/L Neutrophils > 1.0 x 109/L No blasts |
Blasts < 5% Dysplasia allowed | N/A | N/A |
Partial remission (PR) | Hgb > 110 g/L
Platelets > 100 x 109/L Neutrophils > 1.0 x 109/L All counts < upper normal limit No blasts or immature cells |
Not relevant | Hgb > 110 g/L
Platelets > 100 x 109/L Neutrophils > 1.0 x 109/L No blasts |
Blasts < 5% but > 50% ![]() |
N/A | N/A |
Marrow CR | N/A | N/A | Not relevant | Blasts < 5% and > 50% ![]() |
N/A | N/A |
Clinical improvement | Table 1 | Not relevant | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Hematologic improvement | N/A | N/A | Cheson et al32 | Not relevant | N/A | N/A |
Complete response | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Table 3 | Not relevant |
Major response | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Table 3 | Not relevant |
Moderate response | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Table 3 | Not relevant |
Minor response | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Table 3 | Not relevant |
1. Complete remission (CR) | i. Complete resolution of disease-related symptoms and signs including palpable hepatosplenomegaly. |
ii. Peripheral blood count remission defined as hemoglobin level at least 110 g/L, platelet count at least 100 x 109/L, and absolute neutrophil count at least 1.0 x 109/L. In addition, all 3 blood counts should be no higher than the upper normal limit. | |
iii. Normal leukocyte differential including disappearance of nucleated red blood cells, blasts, and immature myeloid cells in the peripheral smear, in the absence of splenectomy (Because of subjectivity in peripheral blood smear interpretation, CR does not require absence of morphologic abnormalities of red cells, platelets, and neutrophils) | |
iv. Bone marrow histologic remission defined as the presence of age-adjusted normocellularity, no more than 5% myeloblasts, and an osteomyelofibrosis grade no higher than 1. (In patients with CR, a complete cytogenetic response is defined as failure to detect a cytogenetic abnormality in cases with a pre-existing abnormality. A partial cytogenetic response is defined as 50% or greater reduction in abnormal metaphases. In both cases, at least 20 bone marrow- or peripheral blood-derived metaphases should be analyzed. A major molecular response is defined as the absence of a specific disease-associated mutation in peripheral blood granulocytes of previously positive cases. In the absence of a cytogenetic/molecular marker, monitoring for treatment-induced inhibition of endogenous myeloid colony formation is encouraged. Finally, baseline and posttreatment bone marrow slides are to be stained at the same time and interpreted at one sitting by a central review process) | |
2. Partial remission (PR) | Requires all of the above criteria for CR except the requirement for bone marrow histologic remission. However, a repeat bone marrow biopsy is required in the assessment of PR and may or may not show favorable changes that do not however fulfill criteria for CR. |
3. Clinical improvement (CI) | Requires one of the following in the absence of both disease progression (as outlined below) and CR/PR assignment (CI response is validated only if it lasts for no fewer than 8 weeks) |
i. A minimum 20-g/L increase in hemoglobin level or becoming transfusion independent (applicable only for patients with baseline hemoglobin level of less than 100 g/L). (Transfusion dependency is defined by a history of at least 2 units of red blood cell transfusions in the last month for a hemoglobin level of less than 85 g/L that was not associated with clinically overt bleeding. Similarly, during protocol therapy, transfusions for a hemoglobin level of 85 g/L or more is discouraged unless it is clinically indicated) | |
ii. Either a minimum 50% reduction in palpable splenomegaly of a spleen that is at least 10 cm at baseline or a spleen that is palpable at more than 5 cm at baseline becomes not palpable. (In splenectomized patients, palpable hepatomegaly is substituted with the same measurements) | |
iii. A minimum 100% increase in platelet count and an absolute platelet count of at least 50 000 x 109/L (applicable only for patients with baseline platelet count below 50 x 109/L). | |
iv. A minimum 100% increase in ANC and an ANC of at least 0.5 x 109/L (applicable only for patients with baseline absolute neutrophil count below 1 x 109/L). | |
4. Progressive disease (PD) | Requires one of the following ( It is acknowledged that worsening cytopenia might represent progressive disease, but its inclusion as a formal criterion was avoided because of the difficulty distinguishing disease-associated from drug-induced myelosuppression. However, a decrease in hemoglobin level of 20 g/L or more, a 100% increase in transfusion requirement, and new development of transfusion dependency, each lasting for more than 3 months after the discontinuation of protocol therapy, can be considered disease progression) : |
i. Progressive splenomegaly that is defined by the appearance of a previously absent splenomegaly that is palpable at greater than 5 cm below the left costal margin or a minimum 100% increase in palpable distance for baseline splenomegaly of 5-10 cm or a minimum 50% increase in palpable distance for baseline splenomegaly of greater than 10 cm. | |
ii. Leukemic transformation confirmed by a bone marrow blast count of at least 20%. | |
iii. An increase in peripheral blood blast percentage of at least 20% that lasts for at least 8 weeks. | |
5. Stable disease (SD) | None of the above. |
6. Relapse | Loss of CR, PR, or CI. In other words, a patient with CR or PR is considered to have undergone relapse when he or she no longer fulfills the criteria for even CI. However, changes from either CR to PR or CR/PR to CI should be documented and reported. |
1. Complete response | Complete response in anemia, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and platelet and leukocyte count |
i. Complete response in anemia: hemoglobin level at least 120 g/L for transfusion-independent patients or at least 110 g/L for transfusion-dependent patients (applicable only for patients with baseline hemoglobin level below 100 g/L). | |
ii. Complete response in splenomegaly: spleen not palpable. | |
iii. Complete response in constitutional symptoms: absence of constitutional symptoms (fever, drenching night sweats, or a minimum 10% weight loss). | |
iv. Complete response in platelet count: platelet count 150-400 x 109/L. | |
v. Complete response in leukocyte count: leukocyte count 4-10 x 109/L. | |
2. Major response | Any response in both anemia and splenomegaly without progression in constitutional symptoms or complete response in anemia without progression in splenomegaly or partial response in anemia in a baseline transfusion-dependent patient combined with response in constitutional symptoms without progression in splenomegaly or any response in splenomegaly combined with response in constitutional symptoms without progression in anemia. |
i. Partial response in anemia: either a minimum 20-g/L increase in hemoglobin level or more than 50% decrease in transfusion requirement. | |
ii. Partial response in splenomegaly: either a minimum 50% decrease in spleen size if baseline is no more than 10 cm from LCM or a minimum 30% decrease if baseline is at least 10 cm from LCM. | |
iii. Partial response in platelet count: a minimum 50% decrease in platelet count if baseline above 800 x 109/L or platelet count increase by at least 50 x 109/L if baseline below 100 x 109/L. | |
iv. Partial response in leukocyte count: a minimum 50% decrease in leukocyte count if baseline above 20 x 109/L or leukocyte count increase by at least 1 x 109/L if baseline below 4 x 109/L. | |
v. Progression in anemia: a hemoglobin decrease of at least 20 g/L or a minimum 50% increase in transfusion requirement or becoming transfusion dependent. | |
vi. Progression in splenomegaly: a minimum 50% increase in spleen size if baseline no more than 10 cm from LCM or a minimum 30% increase if baseline greater than 10 cm from LCM. | |
vii. Progression in constitutional symptoms: appearance of constitutional symptoms. | |
3. Moderate response | Complete response in anemia with progression in splenomegaly or partial response in anemia without progression in splenomegaly or any response in splenomegaly without progression in anemia and constitutional symptoms. |
4. Minor response | Any leukocyte- or platelet-based response without progression in anemia, splenomegaly, or constitutional symptoms. |
5. No response | None of the above. |
6. Histologic response | The panel of experts recommended that a histologic response should include assessment of both age-adjusted bone marrow cellularity and fibrosis. The need for both adequate biopsy specimen and good quality reticulin/collagen staining was underscored. Furthermore, general assessment and scoring of grades of fibrosis is to be done in areas of hematopoiesis after assessing the quality of the reticulin stain by detection of normal staining in vessel walls as internal controls. |
7. Cytogenetic response | Major cytogenetic response: failure to detect a cytogenetic abnormality in cases with a pre-existing abnormality. |
Minor cytogenetic response: a 50% or greater reduction in abnormal metaphases |
Exceptional CML cases have been described with :
vote | quantity (% of cytoplasm volume occupied by the azoic stain precipitate) | granule size | stain intensity | cytoplasm background |
0+ | nothing | - | nothing | nothing |
1+ | 50% | small | mild to moderate | colorless to pale pink/blue |
2+ | 50-80% | small | moderate to strong | colorless to pale pink/blue |
3+ | 80-100% | medium-large | strong | colorless to pink/blue |
4+ | 100% | medium and large | bright | invisible |
|
|
|
|
gene defects | c-kit D816V | all variants of SM (rarely in CM) | > 80% (the presence of D816V KIT mutation in virtually all adults (93%) with indolent and aggressive forms of SM, except well-differentiated SM (29%), while other KIT mutations were rarely (<3%) detected. In around one third of patients with mutated MC, the KIT mutation was also detected in CD34+ haematopoietic cells and eosinophils, and, to a lower extent, in monocytic, neutrophil-lineage BM precursor cells and lymphocytes. Most poor-prognosis SM cases (81%) carried the KIT mutation in two or more BM myeloid cell populations while this was detected in a smaller proportion (27%) of indolent cases. These results would support the notion that KIT mutation is a hallmark of adult SM where it targets a pluripotent haematopoietic stem cell and may contribute to explain previously observed discrepancies in the literatureref) |
c-kit D816Y | CM, SM, SM-AHNMD | < 5% | |
c-kit D816F | CM, SM | < 5% | |
c-kit D816H | SM-AHNMD | < 5% | |
c-kit D820G | ASM | < 5% | |
c-kit V560G | SM | < 5% | |
c-kit F522C | SM | < 5% | |
c-kit E839K | CM | < 5% | |
c-kit V530I | SM-AML | < 5% | |
c-kit K509I | SM (familial type) | < 5% | |
FIP1L1/PDGFRA![]() |
SM-HES, SM with eosinophilia | < 5% | |
gene polymorphisms | IL-4Ra![]() |
CM, indolent SM (ISM) | unknown |
karyotype abnormalities | del 20(q12) | SM, SM-AHNMD | < 5% |
+9 | SM, SM-AHNMD | < 5% | |
t(8;21) | SM-AML M2 | < 5% |
|
|
for |
|