HOMO SAPIENS DISEASES - MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDS)

Table of contents :


  • Aetiology
  • Pathogenesis
  • Laboratory examinations
  • WHO classification, 2004
  • Therapy 
  • Prognosis
  • Web resources


  • A heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by abnormal hematopoietic stem cells => increased apoptosis of precursor cells and trilineage defects in hematopoiesis, including the erythrocytic, granulocytic, and mega-karyocytic lineages => intramedullary accumulation abnormal localization of immature precursors (ALIP) => "ineffective hematopoiesis" => progressive pancytopenia (normocytic and normochromic anemia, leukocytosis with relative neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia). Splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, and lymphadenopathy may not occur until the onset, often explosive, of acute myelogenous leukemia. The term "syndrome" is indicative of the wide clinical spectrum of MDS, which includes patients with moderate anemia with normal neutrophil and platelet counts, patients with hypocellular or markedly hypercellular bone marrows, and others with frank leukemia; clinical courses can range from a few months to many years. Indeed, it is clear that a number of biologically distinct disorders are combined under this rubric, awaiting better molecular characterization to allow better classification. An overview of current understanding of the biology of MDS, the limitations of current treatments and possible future approaches are available in the proceedings of an National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored "State of the Science" meetingref. MDS may be the most common clonal neoplastic disease of hematopoietic origin in adults, with a suggestion that the incidence is rising, in part because of the aging of the population in the Western world. It is probably underdiagnosed and may be the cause of some of the mild to moderate anemias encountered in older people, often attributed to "anemia of chronic disease". MDS is a consequence of multiple mutations accumulating over time that affect the HSC. It is notoriously resistant to chemotherapy with low complete response rates as well as short durations of response. Drug resistance is a feature of virtually all myeloid leukemias deriving from multipotent stem cells, presumably due to further perfection by the neoplastic cells of the multiple mechanisms that protect normal progenitors from damage by exogenous toxins. In addition, there is often a prolonged period of cytopenia due to delayed recovery of normal hematopoiesis following chemotherapy, a particular problem in the elderly population of patients with MDS. Incomplete marrow recovery can also preclude the delivery of postremission treatment to some responding patients. This is in contrast to patients with de novo acute leukemia, in whom there is a relatively reliable return of normal blood counts following effective cytoreductive chemotherapy. This may suggest a deficiency in either the quality or number of normal stem cells in MDS patients. The mechanism(s) by which the development and proliferation of a dysplastic clone suppresses the growth of residual normal hematopoietic elements is not known. It is also unknown whether recovery of peripheral blood counts following therapy for MDS is attributable to the return of polyclonal hematopoiesis or reflects improved differentiation capacity of the MDS clone. Although the MDS were initially considered by many to be synonymous with "preleukemia," this notion has given way to the realization that MDS is a heterogeneous spectrum of stem cell malignancies, with the majority of patients succumbing to complications of bone marrow failure rather than acute leukemia.
    Epidemiology : overall, MDS affects approximately 1 in 500 persons over 60 years of age, making it the most common hematologic malignancy in this age groupref; it may develop at any age, including childhood
    Aetiology :

    Pathogenesis : evidence for clonality in MDS comes primarily from nonrandom X-inactivation studies performed on the bone marrow cells of female patients with MDS. These studies demonstrate clonal involvement of hematopoietic cells in this disorder. Early mutations in stem cells may cause differentiation arrest leading to dysplasia, whereas subsequent defects affecting myeloid cell proliferation may cause the clonal expansion of aberrant cells and frank AML. Although many chromosomal abnormalities have been detected in MDS (e.g., 5q- and monosomy 7), the genes involved are yet to be identified, and it is unknown whether these genetic aberrations are initial events leading to the development of MDS or are secondary events. Laboratory examinations : World Health Organization (WHO) classification, 2004 : since its introduction in 1983, numerous studies have documented the clinical utility of the FAB classification of MDS for predicting prognosis and evolution to acute leukemiaref1, ref2, ref3, including the morphologic, immunologic, and cytogenetic (MIC) working classification of the primary and t-MDSref. In essence, these studies have validated the contributions of a morphologic classification scheme for MDS that incorporates a careful assessment of the number of blasts in the blood and bone marrow and of the cell lineages that are affected by the neoplastic process. WHO changes include a refinement of the definitions for the lower-grade lesions, RA and RARS, and the addition of a new category, refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD). 2 subtypes of RAEB, RAEB-1 with 5% to 9% marrow blasts and RAEB-2 with 10% to 19% marrow blasts, are also recognized. They take into account data published by the International MDS Risk Analysis Workshop that patients with> 10% blasts in the bone marrow have a worse clinical outcome than do those with fewer blasts. The WHO classification also recognizes the "5q syndrome" as a unique, narrowly defined entity. Lastly, because of the controversy as to whether chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myelodysplastic or a myeloproliferative disease, this disorder has been placed in a newly created disease group, MDS/MPD. The FAB guidelines for RA and RARS are somewhat ambiguous and result in different interpretations by different observers. They state that, in RA and RARS, "morphological abnormalities in the granulocytic and megakaryocytic series identical to those present in the other subtypes of MDS may occasionally be found in varying degrees." But they also note that the "erythroid series is mainly affected ... and the granulocytic and megakaryocytic series almost always appear normalref." However narrowly or loosely one interprets these criteria, in practice and in published series RA and RARS include a heterogeneous population of patients, ranging from those with unilineage dysplasia restricted to the erythroid cells to those also manifesting severe dysplasia in the granulocytic and megakaryocytic lineages. A number of studies have shown that, in cases diagnosed as RA or RARS by FAB criteria, the finding of multilineage dysplasia imparts a worse prognosis than if only erythroid dysplasia is present. In RARS, patients with dysplasia restricted to the erythroid series have signs, symptoms, and complications related mainly to anemia, whereas patients with RARS and multilineage dysplasia may also experience complications related to granulocyte or platelet abnormalitiesref1, ref2. Those with only dyserythropoiesis are reported to have longer survival times and a lower rate of transformation to AML and, in contrast to those with multilineage dysplasia, the risk of transformation may not increase significantly throughout the course of the diseaseref. These findings suggest that RARS with unilineage dysplasia is, in most cases, a different disease than RARS with multilineage dysplasia. Similar data are available to indicate that RA, as defined by FAB guidelines, is likewise heterogeneous. In contrast to patients with RA and only dyserythropoiesis, patients with multilineage dysplasia have bicytopenia or pancytopenia, a higher incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities, more frequent progression to AML, and shorter survivalref1, ref2, ref3 (Michels S, Chan W, Jakubowski D, Vogler R. Unclassifiable myelodysplastic syndrome: a study of sixteen cases with a proposal for a new subtype [abstract]. Lab Invest. 1990;62:67). In the WHO classification, RA and RARS are defined as diseases in which dysplasia is morphologically restricted to the erythroid lineage. If there is multilineage dysplasiathat is, > 10% dysplastic cells in 2 or more of the myeloid lineagesand < 5% blasts, no Auer rods, and no monocytosis, the diagnosis is RCMD. In cases of RCMD with at least 15% ringed sideroblasts, the diagnosis is RCMD with ringed sideroblasts (RCMD-RS). Whether there are major clinical or biologic differences between RCMD and RCMD-RS is not yet clear. Data recently published by Germing and associates in a study that included 284 patients with RCMD showed no significant difference in survival or progression to AML between RCMD and RCMD-RSref. A study by Nosslinger et al has taken exception to the WHO proposal in regard to the benefit of further subtyping RA and RARS patients according to the finding of multilineage dysplasia. In their study, patients with RCMD had a better survival than did those with RA or RARSref. However, in that study, not only were the WHO criteria for RCMD not used but a number of patients classified as having RA and RARS had neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia, which would not be expected if these diseases were also defined by the WHO criteria. An important problem in this group of diseases is the possibility of misdiagnosis of MDS due to overinterpretation of dyspoiesis that is secondary to a nonclonal disorder. This is particularly problematic in the diagnosis of RA. Erythroid dysplasia is difficult to define precisely, and the threshold for its recognition is variable from one observer to another. The WHO classification does not entirely eliminate this problem, but the establishment of minimal quantitative thresholds of dysplasia for RA, RARS, RCMD, and RCMD-RS should result in more consistency and accuracy in diagnosis. Whether RARS with unilineage erythroid dysplasia, as defined in the WHO classification, is a myelodysplastic disorder remains to be determined. However, until more reliable markers of erythroid dysplasia are widely available, the category of RA will likely continue to include some cases that are nonclonal erythroid disorders. In addition, occasional patients may present with cytopenias affecting more than one cell lineage and have multilineage dysplasia but not at the 10% level required for a diagnosis of RCMD. If blasts are fewer than 5% in the bone marrow, such cases are difficult to classify or even to recognize as MDS with confidence. In cases like these a presumptive diagnosis of RCMD might be appropriate. However, in such cases as well as for cases suspected to be RA, if there is no evidence of clonality by genetic studies, the WHO recommends observation for 6 months prior to making a diagnosis of MDS. RAEB is divided into 2 subgroups, RAEB-1 and RAEB-2, depending on the number of blasts in the blood and bone marrow. Data from the International Workshop on Prognostic Factors in MDS indicated that patients with > 10% blasts in the bone marrow have a shorter median survival and a higher rate of transformation to acute leukemia than do those with fewer than 10% blastsref. In view of these data, the WHO classification recognizes 2 groups of patients with RAEB, RAEB-1 and RAEB-2, depending on the % of blasts in the blood and marrow and the presence or absence of Auer rods. Similar to AML, it is anticipated that additional myelodysplastic syndromes with a characteristic constellation of clinical, genetic, and pathologic findings will be identified.: The most controversial changes in the WHO classification proved to be the reduction in the blast threshold for the diagnosis of AML and the refinements in the FAB categories of RA and RARS, which deserve further comment.
    disease
    blood findings
    bone marrow findings
    refractory anemia (RA) anemia 
    no or rare blasts 
    < 1 x 109/L monocytes
    erythroid dysplasia only 
    < 10% grans or megas dysplastic 
    < 5% blasts 
    < 15% ringed sideroblasts 
    [ (5q31-). Average survival : 7 years (not evolving to acute leukemia)]
    refractory anemia with 
    ringed sideroblasts (RARS) / acquired idiopathic sideroblastic anemia
    anemia 
    no blasts
    erythroid dysplasia only 
    < 10% grans or megas dysplastic 
    > 15% ringed sideroblasts 
    < 5% blasts 
    [5q31-, 5% evolve to AML]
    refractory cytopenia with 
    multilineage dysplasia (RCMD)
    cytopenias (bicytopenia or pancytopenia) 
    no or rare blasts
    no Auer rods
    < 1 x 109/L monocytes
    dysplasia in > 10% of cells in 2 or more 
    myeloid cell lines 
    < 5% blasts in marrow 
    no Auer rods
    < 15% ringed sideroblasts
    refractory cytopenia with multilineage 
    dysplasia and ringed sideroblasts 
    (RCMD-RS)
    cytopenias (bicytopenia or pancytopenia) 
    no or rare blasts 
    no Auer rods
    < 1 x 109/L monocytes
    dysplasia in > 10% of cells in two or more 
    myeloid cell lines 
    > 15% ringed sideroblasts 
    < 5% blasts 
    no Auer rods
    refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) (5 < blasts in bone marrow < 20%) refractory anemia with excess blasts - 1 (RAEB-1) cytopenias 
    < 5% blasts 
    no Auer rods
    < 1 x 109/L monocytes
    unilineage or multilineage dysplasia 
    5-9% blasts 
    no Auer rods
    refractory anemia with excess blasts - 2 (RAEB-2) cytopenias 
    5-19% blasts 
    Auer rods +/-
    < 1 x 109/L monocytes
    unilineage or multilineage dysplasia 
    10-19% blasts 
    Auer rods +/-
    myelodysplastic syndrome, unclassified (MDS-U) cytopenias 
    no or rare blasts 
    no Auer rods
    unilineage gran or mega dysplasia 
    < 5% blasts 
    no Auer rods
    MDS associated with isolated del (5q) / 5q syndrome : although deletions of 5q may be observed in a wide spectrum of de novo and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemias and myelodysplastic processes, the 5q syndrome is narrowly defined as de novo MDS with an isolated cytogenetic abnormality involving deletions between bands q21 and q32 of chromosome 5. Detailed mapping experiments of this region of chromosome 5 have provided evidence that the gene(s) involved in this syndrome is different than that affected in other subgroups of MDS and AML associated with del(5q)ref1, ref2. In the 5q syndrome there is usually a refractory macrocytic anemia, normal to increased platelet count, and increased numbers of megakaryocytes, many of which have hypolobated nuclei. The number of blasts in the bone marrow and blood is < 5%ref1, ref2. There is usually long survival. Additional cytogenetic abnormalities or > 5% blasts in the blood or marrow is exclusionary for the diagnosis.  refractory macrocytic anemia 
    < 5% blasts
    platelets normal or increased
    normal to increased megakaryocytes 
    with hypolobulated nuclei 
    < 5% blasts
    no Auer rods
    isolated del (5q)
    Therapy :


    Protocols :

    Response criteria in MDS : transformation to AML occurs commonly in patients with MDS presenting with higher levels of blasts in the marrow. Nevertheless, the major causes of death are infection and hemorrhage, as well as other medical problems characteristic of an older patient population. Complete responses (CR) are not common after most treatments of MDS and a variety of cumbersome definitions have been used to try to capture the clinically relevant but often "incomplete" improvements in blood counts that are induced by some therapies. Recently, an international group of investigators proposed criteria for CR, partial response (PR) and different degrees of hematologic improvementref1, ref2. Although admittedly somewhat arbitrary and subject to future revisions, they should also provide some consistency in reports of treatment outcome. It is also important that published reports distinguish between patients with hematologic improvement that is clinically relevant, such as reduction or elimination of transfusion requirements, as compared to less clinically meaningful changes such as a doubling of the platelet count from a baseline of > 75,000/mm3. IWG criteria, Cheson, 2006ref :
    Remission rates according to the International Working Group response criteria :
                  IWG response
          IPSS (%)   % hematologic response    
      Treatment   No. patients   Low   Int1   Int2   High   Overall   CR   PR   Median survival, mo   % HI-major
    azacitidine17   99    5 (Evaluated in only 39 of 99 patients)   53    23    17    11    10    1    20    36 (+minor) 
    decitabine18   89      31    43    26    17    9    8    22.3/13.3 (data are for responders and nonresponders, respectively)   13 
    tipifarnib19   82      17    39    44    12    7    5    11.9 (time to leukemia or death: 6.4 months)   22 
    arsenic20   101    NA   39 (data for combined Low and Int1)   NA    61 (data combined for Int2 and High)   1    1    0    NA    20 
    IWG-defined hematologic improvement by cell lineage in patients with MDS :
          % response (some patients achieved responses in more than 1 lineage), major (minor)
      Treatment   No. patients   % IPSS/FAB   hematologic improvement, erythroid response   % hematologic improvement, platelet response   % hematologic improvement, neutrophil response
      Lenalidomide21   43    Low, 51; Int1, 37; Int2, 9; High, 2    49 (7)    10    17 
      Darbepoetin alfa24   40    Low, 38; Int1, 52; Int2, 10    47 (12)    0    0 
      Antithymocyte immunoglobulin25   20    RA, 65; RARS, 15; RAEB, 20    45 (5)    35 (10)    10 (5) 
      Antithymocyte immunoglobulin26   68    RA, 53; RARS, 4; RAEB, 11    67 (20)    40 (27)    27 (7) 
      Cyclosporine A27   50    Low, 8; Int1, 82; Int2, 10    34 (16)    16 (12)    22 (4) 
      Thalidomide28   83    Low/Int1, 70; High/Int2, 30    13 (5)    0 (1)    0 
      Thalidomide29   29    RA, 14; RARS, 4; RAEB, 3; RAEB-t, 5; CMML, 3    10 (21)    14 (7)    3 (7) 
      Arsenic trioxide20   101    Low/Int1, 39; High/Int2, 61    11 (0)   6 (0)    8 (0) 
      Valproic acid30   18    Low, 17; Int1, 55; Int2, 17; High, 11    11 (0)    11 (0)    6 (0) 
    Proposed modified International Working Group response criteria for altering natural history of MDS7 (deletions to IWG response criteria are not shown) :
      Category   Response criteria (responses must last at least 4 wk)
      Complete remission    Bone marrow: <= 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines*
      Persistent dysplasia will be noted* (Modification to IWG response criteria)
      Peripheral blood (In some circumstances, protocol therapy may require the initiation of further treatment (eg, consolidation, maintenance) before the 4-week period. Such patients can be included in the response category into which they fit at the time the therapy is started. Transient cytopenias during repeated chemotherapy courses should not be considered as interrupting durability of response, as long as they recover to the improved counts of the previous course)
          Hgb >= 11 g/dL 
          Platelets >= 100 x 109/L 
          Neutrophils >= 1.0 x 109/L (Modification to IWG response criteria)
          Blasts 0% 
      Partial remission    All CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except: 
      Bone marrow blasts decreased by >= 50% over pretreatment but still > 5% 
      Cellularity and morphology not relevant 
      Marrow CR (Modification to IWG response criteria)   Bone marrow: <= 5% myeloblasts and decrease by > 50% over pretreatment (Modification to IWG response criteria)
      Peripheral blood: if HI responses, they will be noted in addition to marrow CR (Modification to IWG response criteria)
      Stable disease    Failure to achieve at least PR, but no evidence of progression for > 8 wks 
      Failure    Death during treatment or disease progression characterized by worsening of cytopenias, increase in percentage of bone marrow blasts, or progression to a more advanced MDS FAB subtype than pretreatment 
      Relapse after CR or PR    At least 1 of the following: 
          Return to pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage 
          Decrement of >= 50% from maximum remission/response levels in granulocytes or platelets 
          Reduction in Hgb concentration by >= 1.5 g/dL or transfusion dependence 
      Cytogenetic response  complete : disappearance of the chromosomal abnormality without appearance of new ones 
    partial : > 50% reduction of the chromosomal abnormality
      Disease progression    For patients with: 
          Less than 5% blasts: >= 50% increase in blasts to > 5% blasts 
          5%-10% blasts: >= 50% increase to > 10% blasts 
          10%-20% blasts: >= 50% increase to > 20% blasts 
          20%-30% blasts: >= 50% increase to > 30% blasts 
      Any of the following: 
          At least 50% decrement from maximum remission/response in granulocytes or platelets 
          Reduction in Hgb by >= 2 g/dL 
          Transfusion dependence 
      Survival    Endpoints: 
          Overall: death from any cause 
          Event free: failure or death from any cause 
          PFS: disease progression or death from MDS 
          DFS: time to relapse 
          Cause-specific death: death related to MDS 
    Proposed modified International Working Group response criteria for hematologic improvement7 :
      Hematologic improvement (Pretreatment counts averages of at least 2 measurements (not influenced by transfusions) >= 1 week apart (modification).)   Response criteria (responses must last at least 8 wk)
      Erythroid response (pretreatment, < 11 g/dL)    Hgb increase by >= 1.5 g/dL 
      Relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 wk compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 wk. Only RBC transfusions given for a Hgb of <= 9.0 g/dL pretreatment will count in the RBC transfusion response evaluation (Modification to IWG response criteria)
      Platelet response (pretreatment, < 100 x 109/L)    Absolute increase of >= 30 x 109/L for patients starting with > 20 x 109/L platelets 
      Increase from < 20 x 109/L to > 20 x 109/L and by at least 100% (Modification to IWG response criteria)
      Neutrophil response (pretreatment, < 1.0 x 109/L)    At least 100% increase and an absolute increase > 0.5 x 109/L (Modification to IWG response criteria)
      Progression or relapse after HI (In the absence of another explanation, such as acute infection, repeated courses of chemotherapy (modification), gastrointestinal bleeding, hemolysis, and so forth. It is recommended that the 2 kinds of erythroid and platelet responses be reported overall as well as by the individual response pattern)   At least 1 of the following: 
          At least 50% decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets 
          Reduction in Hgb by >= 1.5 g/dL 
          Transfusion dependence 

    Prognosisref : morphologic classification alone is insufficient, deriving prognostic power primarily from thresholds in blast percentageref (List AF, Sandberg AA, Doll DC. Myelodysplastic syndromes. In: Lee RG, Bithell TC, Foerster J, Athens JW, Lukens JN, eds. Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology (11th Ed). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:2207-2234). Prognostic modeling permits identification of variables with independent power for outcome prediction.

    X-linked sideroblastic anaemia (XLSA) is characterised by accumulation of inorganic iron in erythroblast mitochondria, visualised on staining as distinctive perinuclear rings. It arises from a deficiency of the erythroid specific isoenzyme of -aminolaevulinate synthase (ALAS2; E.C. 2.3.1.3 [EC] .7), caused mainly by mutations affecting the catalytic or substrate-binding domains (Anderson KE, Sassa S, Bishop DF, et al. Disorders of heme biosynthesis: X-linked sideroblastic anemia and the porphyrias. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, Childs B, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, eds. The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. Vol 2, 8th edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2001:2991–3062; Bottomley SS. Sideroblastic anaemias. In: Greer JP, Foerster J, Lukens JN, Rodgers GM, Paraskevas F, Glader B, eds. Wintrobe’s clinical hematology. Vol 1, 11th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004:1011–33). ALAS2 uses pyridoxal-5-phosphate as a cofactor to catalyse the first, rate-limiting step of erythroid haem synthesis and pyridoxine treatment can alleviate anaemia in many cases, although the response is variable and affected by factors such as mutation, age and iron loadref1, ref2

    Web resources :


    Copyright © 2001-2014 Daniele Focosi. All rights reserved  |  Terms of use  | Legal notices
    About this site  |  Site map  |  Acknowledgements | Open forum  |    |  Current link partners
     Abbreviations and acronyms  |  Medical terminology  |  Add a link  |  Translate   |  Softwares

    Rate Us: 



    This website subscribes to
                  the HONcode principles of the HON Foundation. Click to
                  verify.eXTReMe
                  Tracker




    PicoSearch
     



    Search 



    Search 
    for 



    Search Medical Dictionary 
    for