- hypofunctionality :
- sclerema adiposum or neonatorum / Underwood's disease
: a severe, sometimes fatal, disorder of adipose tissue
occurring chiefly in preterm, sick, or debilitated infants
suffering from a serious underlying illness, manifested by
diffuse, rapidly progressive, nonpitting induration of the
involved tissue, causing the skin to become cold, yellowish
white, mottled, boardlike, and inflexible
- underweight / thinness
(BMI < 18.5 kg / m2) (old classification :
< 19.1 kg / m2 in females and < 20.7 kg / m2
in males)
- class I : 17 < BMI < 18.4
- class II : 16 < BMI < 16.9
- class III : < 16
Aetiology :
- constitutional
- malnutrition

- hypoanabolism
- hypercatabolism
- chronic poisoning
Pathogenesis : increased adiponectin
Therapy : aetiological, TPN
Experimental animal models : the
first inducible 'fatless' model system, the FAT-ATTAC
mouse (fat apoptosis through targeted activation of
caspase 8). This transgenic mouse develops identically to
wild-type littermates. Apoptosis of adipocytes can be induced
at any developmental stage by administration of a FK1012
analog leading to the dimerization of a membrane-bound,
adipocyte-specific caspase 8-FKBP fusion protein. Within 2
weeks of dimerizer administration, FAT-ATTAC mice show
near-knockout levels of circulating adipokines and markedly
reduced levels of adipose tissue. FAT-ATTAC mice are glucose
intolerant, have diminished basal and endotoxin-stimulated
systemic inflammation, are less responsive to
glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and show increased food
intake independent of the effects of leptin. Most importantly,
we show that functional adipocytes can be recovered upon
cessation of treatment, allowing the study of adipogenesis in
vivo, as well as a detailed examination of the
importance of the adipocyte in the regulation of multiple
physiological functions and pathological statesref.
- hyperfunctionality : hyperliposis:
an excess of fat in the blood serum or tissues
Grading :
- adiposis : fatty change of
an organ or tissue
- adiposis
dolorosa / Dercum's disease : first described by
Dercum (Dercum FX. Three cases of hitherto unclassified
affection resembling in its grosser aspects obesity, but
associated with special nervous symptoms, adiposis
dolorosa. Am J Med Sci 1892;104:521-535; Dercum FX. A
subcutaneous connective tissue dystrophy of the arms and
back, associated with symptoms resembling myxoedema. Univ
Med Mag Phila 1888;1: 140-50) in the late 1800s as a
connective-tissue dystrophy associated with obesity
accompanied by painful localized fatty swellings in trunk
and limbs (expecially near knees) and by various nerve
lesions. The disease is usually seen in obese
postmenopausal women, and may cause death from pulmonary
complications. It is characterized by multiple painful
subcutaneous lipomas on the trunk and extremitiesref.
This disorder usually occurs in women 40 to 60 years of
age. The typical patient is an obese woman with pain that
appears to be out of proportion to the physical findings.
Various areas of the body may swell for no apparent
reason, and the swelling may disappear without treatment.
Some patients have a history of alcoholism, depression, or
emotional instability, and subjective weakness or
confusion may occur as part of the syndrome. Although
there are rare familial casesref1,
ref2,
most cases are sporadic. Fatty deposits in adiposis
dolorosa may be diffuse or localized and may be found in
almost any location except the head and neck.
- in periarticular adiposis dolorosa, painful
folds of fat infiltrate the area around the knees and
hipsref
- in the diffuse, generalized type of adiposis
dolorosa, fatty deposits are found in the dorsal upper
arm, axillary vault, gluteal region, stomach wall, and
the soles of the feet. In nodular adiposis dolorosa,
soft lipomas attached to surrounding tissues are found
on the trunk, arms, and legs, sometimes in the absence
of general obesity. There is intense pain in and around
the lipomas.
Aetiology : not known
Pathogenesis : no abnormalities
have been noted in the adipose tissue by light or electron
microscopyref.
The cause of the pain is not clear, but it may be due to
pressure on nerves by the lipomas.
Therapy : symptom-specific and
may consist of a variety of analgesics including
intramuscular or intravenous lidocaine
ref,
corticosteroids
,
liposuction
with compression, and surgical excision of especially
painful lipomasref1,
ref2.
IFN-a2b
was used to treat chronic hepatitis C in 2 patients with
adiposis dolorosa, and it induced long-term relief of painref.
Several case reports during the past 30 years have described
the use of systemically administered lidocaine (Dercum FX. A
subcutaneous connective tissue dystrophy of the arms and
back, associated with symptoms resembling myxoedema. Univ
Med Mag Phila 1888;1: 140-50)ref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
but long-term intravenous administration of lidocaine is
impractical and is associated with neurotoxicity. Several
voltage-gated sodium-channel blockers are clinically
available, including the anticonvulsant agents
carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine,
topiramate, and zonisamide; the antiarrhythmic agent
mexiletine; and the tricyclic antidepressant agent
amitriptyline. Some of these drugs exhibit multiple
mechanisms of action, but even the relatively selective
sodium-channel blockers lack the pharmacologic specificity
that is required to avoid also targeting normal physiologic
activity of the central nervous system and so may be
associated with dose-related adverse effects. The narrow
therapeutic ratio of this class of drugs may account in part
for the inability to show analgesic efficacy consistently in
clinical trials of peripheral neuropathic pain (with the
exception of trigeminal neuralgia)
- adiposis
tuberosa simplex / Anders' diseases : a disorder
resembling adiposis dolorosa, marked by development in the
subcutaneous tissue of fatty masses which are sometimes
painful to pressure
- adiposis
universalis : a deposit of fat generally throughout
the body, including the internal organs.
- overweight sensu latu
(BMI > 25 kg / m2)
- preobesity / overweight sensu
strictu (25 < BMI < 30 kg / m2
or Lorentz index = 110-130%; old classification :
borderline overweight = BMI = 25.8-27.3 kg / m2
in females, 26.4-27.8 kg / m2 in males;
overweight = 27.3-32-3 kg / m2 in females,
27.8-31.1 kg / m2 in males)
Epidemiology : worldwide
prevalence > 1 billion
- USA by 1999-2000 NHANES estimates, 35% of US adults
is overweight; 30% of newborns are overweight : 30%
remains in childhood and 80% in adolescence
- Europe : prevalence > 50% of people
- UK : 44% of men and 33% of women were classed as
overweight in 2003ref.
The prevalence of obesity in UK children aged 2 to 10
increased from 9.9% in 1995 to 13.7% in 2003. The
total number of overweight and obese children rose
from 22.7% to 27.7% in this period. Obesity increased
most in older children aged 8 to 10, rising from 11.2%
in 1995 to 16.5% in 2003. Levels of obesity were
similar for both sexes, increasing from 9.6% in 1995
to 14.9% in 2003 for boys and from 10.3% to 12.5% for
girls. More detailed figures for 2001 and 2002
provided information on risk factors for obesity.
Children living in households with the lowest incomes
had higher rates of obesity than those from households
with the highest household incomes (15.8% v 13.3%).
Levels of obesity were 5% higher among children living
in the most deprived areas (16.4%) compared with
children from the least deprived (11.2%). Obesity
levels were lowest in Yorkshire and the Humber and the
south east (11%-13%), and highest in the north east
and London (about 18%) in 2001-2. Children living in
inner city areas were particularly prone to obesity.
Based on socioeconomic groups (analysed using the
national statistics socioeconomic classification,
similar to social class), 17.1% of children whose
parents had semiroutine or routine occupations were
obese compared with 12.4% of those from managerial and
professional households. Children were much more
likely to be overweight or obese if both parents were
overweight or obese. 19.8% of children living in
households in which both parents were overweight or
obese were themselves obese compared with 6.7% of
children living in households in which neither parent
was overweight or obese and 8.4% of children living in
households in which one of the two parents was
overweight or obese. The study used the 85th and 95th
percentiles of the 1990 UK data as cut-off points for
overweight and obesity. Figures for subsequent years
were then compared with the 1990 reference data. These
statistics show the urgent need for public health
measures to reduce the growing obesity epidemic, with
the young as a key target. Measures should be
introduced across the board, including efforts to
increase breastfeeding, for which rates are abysmal in
the UK, through to measures to change food intake and
physical activity levels. The recent government
initiatives to highlight obesity are welcomed but the
target of halting the rise in childhood obesity by
2010 was too conservative : it potentially condemns
children not yet born to the current unacceptably high
rates of obesity. Measures to reduce childhood
obesity, such as replacing unhealthy foods and drinks
in school vending machines with healthier alternatives
and stopping the advertising of unhealthy foods to
children, could be introduced immediately. At the same
time longer term measures could be devised, such as
changing food content and improving food labelling.
Reducing obesity in children has to be a high priority
for public health. The findings were based on
information collected from the Health Survey for
England, an annual survey that interviews about 16 000
adults and 4000 children and includes height and
weight measurements, enabling body mass index to be
calculated. Additional information was collected in
2002, when more children were interviewed than in a
standard year. This information was combined with data
collected from children and young adults interviewed
in 2001 to generate much larger sample sizes to enable
comparisons between different subgroupsref.
- Italy : prevalence = 30%
- China : prevalence = 137 million adults (doubled in
women and almost tripled in men from 1989 to 1997)ref
- obesity / adiposity /
adipositas (BMI > 30 kg/mBSA2
or Lorentz index > 130%; old classification : BMI >
32.3 kg / m2 in females, > 31.1 kg / m2
in males)
- hemiobesity : obesity of one side of the
body only.
- class I /
mild obesity (30 < BMI < 35 kg/mBSA2)
- class
II / moderate obesity (35 < BMI < 40 kg/mBSA2)
- class
III / severe or extreme obesity (BMI > 40 kg/mBSA2)
/ morbidly or very severely obese
- super-obesity (BMI > 50 kg/mBSA2)
Epidemiology : worldwide >
300 million are obese. The obesity epidemic is recognized by
WHO as one of the top 10 global health problems.
- USA : by 1999-2000 NHANES estimates, 30.5% of adults
are obese (compared with 22.9% in 1988-1994, with even
higher rates in ethnic minority groups) and 5% are very
severely obese. About 2 of every 3 US adults and 4 of 5
African-American women were overweight or obese in
1999-2000. In children and adolescents, the prevalence
of being overweight rose by 50% in the past decade to
about 15%. The medical and economic outcomes of
excessive bodyweight are great, including an estimated
300,000 excess deaths and at least US$100 billion per
year in medical expenditures. One particularly ominous
public-health issue is the occurrence of glucose
intolerance and type 2 diabetes in obese adolescents and
young adults. For the first time in recent history,
researchers are predicting that the life expectancy of
Americans may begin a sustained decline. By the middle
of this century, the increased risk of diabetes, heart
disease and cancer that they will face could lessen the
average life expectancy by 2-5 years. In general,
longevity predictions are determined by studying
historical trends in death rates. Forecasts of life
expectancy are an important component of public policy
that influence age-based entitlement programs such as
Social Security and Medicare. Various agencies, such as
the US Social Security Administration (SSA), have used
this method to predict that the life expectancy of
Americans will continue to rise over the next century,
but they ignore the effect of obesity on future
generationsref.
Extrapolating to the whole population, at the moment,
obesity reduces average life expectancy by about 4-9
months. And because the prevalence of obesity among
children and teenagers has risen sharply over the past
30 years, the researchers predict that the shortening
effect could become as much as 2-5 years by mid-century.
It's equivalent to the negative effect of cancer on
population longevity, which is 3.5 years. Obesity should
be a significant factor in life expectancy projections,
but forecasts by agencies try to balance negative
factors with positives, such as medical breakthroughs.
The 2006 IOM report Food Marketing to Children and
Youth: Threat or Opportunity provides a chilling
account of how this practice affects children's health.
Food marketing, the IOM says, intentionally targets
children who are too young to distinguish advertising
from truth and induces them to eat high-calorie,
low-nutrient (but highly profitable) "junk" foods;
companies succeed so well in this effort that
business-as-usual cannot be allowed to continue. Since
the late 1970s, obesity rates have more than doubled
among children 6 to 11 years of age and more than
tripled among those 12 to 19 years of age. At least 30%
of the calories in the average child's diet derive from
sweets, soft drinks, salty snacks, and fast food. Soft
drinks account for > 10% of the caloric intake,
representing a doubling since 1980. According to the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, even babies consume
measurable quantities of soft drinks, and pediatricians
say it is not unusual for overweight children to consume
1200 to 2000 calories per day from soft drinks alone.
The IOM conducted its study under a considerable
handicap. Companies would not provide proprietary
information, because the IOM is required to make public
all documents it uses. The report reveals why companies
insist on keeping such research private. It lists
numerous firms that conduct marketing research focused
even on preschool children, using methods — photography,
ethnography, focus groups — in an Orwellian-sounding
fashion to elucidate the psychological underpinnings of
children's food choices, "kid archetypes," the "psyche
of mothers as the family gatekeeper," and "parent–child
dyads of information." This enterprise is breathtaking
in its comprehensive and unabashed effort to provide a
research basis for exploiting the suggestibility of
young children. Although marketers justify appeals to
children as "training" in consumer culture, as free
speech, and as good for business, they are not selling
just any consumer product: they are selling junk foods
to children who would be better off not eating them.
American children spend nearly $30 billion of their own
money annually on such foods, and companies design
products to tap this market. Since 1994, U.S. companies
have introduced about 600 new children's food products;
50% of them have been candies or chewing gums, and
another 25% are other types of sweets or salty snacks.
Only 25% are more healthful items, such as baby foods,
bread products, and bottled waters. Companies support
sales of "kids' foods," with marketing budgets totaling
an estimated $10 billion annuallyref.
Kellogg spent $22.2 million just on media advertising to
promote 139.8 million dollars' worth of Cheez-It
crackers in 2004, but these figures are dwarfed by
McDonald's $528.8 million expenditure to support $24.4
billion in sales. Marketing to children is hardly new,
but recent methods are far more intense and pervasive.
Television still predominates, but the balance is
shifting to product placements in toys, games,
educational materials, songs, and movies; character
licensing and celebrity endorsements; and less visible
"stealth" campaigns involving word of mouth,
cellular-telephone text messages, and the Internet. All
aim to teach children to recognize brands and pester
their parents to buy them. The IOM notes that by two
years of age, most children can recognize products in
supermarkets and ask for them by name. But the most
insidious purpose of marketing is to persuade children
to eat foods made "just for them" — not what adults are
eating. Some campaigns aim to convince children that
they know more about what they are "supposed to" eat
than their parents do. Marketers explicitly attempt to
undermine family decisions about food choices by
convincing children that they, not adults, should
control those choicesref.
Indeed, children now routinely report that they, and not
their parents, decide what to eat. The IOM concludes
that its data establish a "need and an opportunity [to]
. . . turn food and beverage marketing forces toward
better diets for American children and youth." This will
be no small task. Junk foods are major sources of
revenue for food companies. In response to threats of
lawsuits and legislation, companies are scrambling to
support health and exercise programs, to announce
policies renouncing advertising directed at children
under certain ages, and to make their products appear
more healthful. Hence: vitamin-enriched candy,
whole-grain chocolate cereals, and trans fat–free salty
snacks. Yet candies, soft drinks, and snack foods remain
the most heavily promoted products. Companies must do
better. At the moment, their efforts — and those of
government agencies — to promote more healthful foods
"remain far short of their full potential." If the
industry does not change its practices voluntarily,
"Congress should enact legislation mandating the shift."
Strong words, but the IOM can only advise. Others,
however, can act. In January 2006, advocacy groups
announced a Massachusetts lawsuit to enjoin Kellogg and
Viacom, owner of the Nickelodeon television network,
from promoting junk foods to childrenref.
Dozens of state legislatures have introduced bills to
curb food marketing, and parent and advocacy groups are
demanding bans on food marketing in schools. Such
efforts may push U.S. policies in the direction of those
of > 50 other countries that regulate television
advertising aimed at children. Australia, for example,
bans food advertisements meant for children < 14
years of age; the Netherlands bans advertisements for
sweets to those younger than 12; and Sweden bans the use
of cartoon characters to promote foods to children <
12. Although such actions have not eliminated childhood
obesity — rates in these countries are increasing,
although they remain lower than the U.S. rate — they may
help to slow current trends. In contrast, U.S.
regulations apply only to time: commercials may take up
to 12 minutes per hour during weekdays but "only" 10.5
minutes per hour on weekends. The IOM report provides
plenty of evidence to support additional policy actions.
Worth serious consideration, I believe, are restrictions
or bans on the use of cartoon characters, celebrity
endorsements, health claims on food packages, stealth
marketing, and marketing in schools, along with federal
actions that promote media literacy, better school
meals, and consumption of fruits and vegetables. Without
further changes in society, such actions may not be
enough to prevent childhood obesity, but they should
make it much easier for parents — and health care
providers — to encourage children to eat more
healthfullyref
- Europe : prevalence = 20%
- UK : between 1993 and 2003 the percentage of men
who were obese rose from 13% to 23% and the percentage
of women rose from 16% to 23%ref
- Italy : prevalence = 10%
- China : around 18 million adultsref
Aetiology : if only 1 parent is
obese, the child has a 40% likelihood to be obese; when both
parents are obese, the child has a 80% likelihood to be obese.
- intrinsic aetiology
- POMC
/ a-MSH
deficiency
- prohormone
convertase 1 (PC1) deficiency
- MC1R
deficiency (5%
of severe obesity cases)
- MC3R
deficiciency
- MC4R
deficiency
- leptin
deficiency (rare)
- leptin receptor
deficiency
(rare)
- primarary
hyperlipidemias

- Prader-Willi
syndrome (PWS)
: chromosomal abnormalities underlying the disease cause
the highest ghrelin
levels ever measured in
any humans
- 11b-HSD-1
excess
- functional inactivation of a single allele of the
homeobox gene Prox1led to adult-onset obesity due
to abnormal lymph leakage from mispatterned and ruptured
lymphatic vesselsref
- mice GE to overexpress Wnt10b
under the control of the
adipocyte-specific promoter FABP4
eat unlimited amounts of high-fat mouse chow, but consume
slightly less oxygen and have about 50% less body fat than
normal mice on a low-fat diet. And despite they produce
half the normal amount of leptin, the insulin sensitivity
and glucose tolerance of transgenic mice on a high-fat
diet was better than that of normal mice on a low-fat diet
: they show no signs of diabetes or other metabolic
disorders, which are common in animals with too little
fat. The mice have underdeveloped mammary glands, an
inability to generate body heat and skin that's twice as
thick as normal.
- c-Cbl
-/-
mice exhibit a profound increase in whole-body energy
expenditure as determined by 10°C increased core
temperature and 30% increased whole-body oxygen
consumption. As a consequence, these mice displayed a 50%
decrease in adiposity, primarily due to a reduction in
cell size despite a 30% increase in food intake. These
changes were accompanied by a significant increase in
activity (2- to 3-fold). In addition, c-Cbl-/-
mice displayed a marked improvement in whole-body insulin
action, primarily due to changes in muscle metabolism,
making it more resistant to type II diabetes. They also
have increased protein levels of the insulin receptor
(4-fold) and uncoupling
protein-3 (UCP-3)
(2-fold) in
skeletal muscle and a significant increase in the
phosphorylation of AMPK and acetyl-CoA carboxylaseref.
- extrinsic aetiology
- secondary
hyperlipidemias

- adiposis
cerebralis / cerebral adiposity : obesity due to a
lesion in the brain, especially the hypothalamus, as in
adiposogenital dystrophy
- Human
adenovirus type 36

- motivational factors and food preference development
- overconsumption of energy (easy availability
of a wide variety of good-tasting, inexpensive,
energy-dense foods and the serving of these foods in
large portions). 81.5 pounds of corn sweeteners are
consumed per capita in the US each year (a 586% increase
since 1966). There has been a 20% increase in the price
of a soft drink in the US vs. a 118% increase in the
price of fresh fruit and vegetables since 1985. There
are 10 federal subsidies, in billions of dollars, to the
US corn industryref.
Because of its rapid development in genetically stable
populations, the obesity epidemic can be attributed to
environmental factors affecting diet, or physical
activity level. One potentially important dietary factor
is consumption of fast food, which can be defined as
convenience food purchased in self-service or carry-out
eating places. From its origins in the 1950s, fast food
has grown into a dominant dietary pattern, with a
current estimate of about 247115 restaurants in the USA.
Consumption of fast food by children has risen from 2%
of total energy in the late 1970s to 10% of energy in
the 1990s. Several factors inherent to fast food as it
now exists could promote a positive energy balance and
thereby increase risk for obesity and diabetes,
including: excessive portion size, with single large
meals often approaching or exceeding individual daily
energy requirement; palatability, emphasising primordial
taste preferences for sugar, salt, and fat; high energy
density; and high glycaemic load. Several dietary
factors such as trans-fatty acids and high
glycaemic load might also enhance risk for diabetes
through energy-independent mechanisms. Surprisingly few
studies have investigated the effects of fast-food
consumption on energy balance or bodyweight, and most of
these are of cross-sectional design. The Coronary Artery
Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) showed that
participants who consumed fast food >= 2 times a week
gained approximately 10 more pounds and had twice as
great increase in insulin resistance in the 15-year
period than participants who consumed fast food less
than once per weekref.
- reduction of total energy expenditure by reducing
physical activity (reduction in jobs requiring
physical labor, reduction in energy expenditures at
school and in daily living, and an increase in time
spent on sedentary activities such as watching
television, surfing the Web, and playing video games.
There is a 6% increase in the likelihood of becoming
obese per hour spent in a car each day
- depression

- short sleep duration : in population studies, a
dose-response relationship with high BMI has been reported
across all age groupsref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,ref6,
ref7.
In the largest studied sample, elevated BMI occurred for
habitual sleep amounts below 7–8 href.
A U-shaped curvilinear relationship between sleep duration
and BMI was observed for women, but for men, there was a
monotonic trend towards higher BMI with shorter sleep
duration. Importantly, a recent prospective study
identified a longitudinal association between sleep
curtailment and future weight gainref.
Patients with short sleep had reduced leptin
and elevated ghrelin
. These differences in
leptin and ghrelin are likely to increase appetite,
possibly explaining the increased BMI observed with short
sleep duration. In Western societies, where chronic sleep
restriction is common and food is widely available,
changes in appetite regulatory hormones with sleep
curtailment may contribute to obesityref.
Habitual sleep duration below 7.7 h was associated with
increased BMI, similar to findings in other studies
including childrenref1,
ref2,
adolescentsref,
and adultsref1,
ref2.
A significant association of sleep duration with leptin
and ghrelin that is independent of BMI, age, sex, sleep-disordered
breathing
(SDB)
(a pathology associated with increased BMI), and other
possible confounding factors (analysis not shown for SDB
and other confounders) has also been reported. Short sleep
duration was associated with decreased leptin and
increased ghrelin, changes that have also been observed in
reaction to food restriction and weight loss and are
typically associated with increased appetite. These
hormone alterations may contribute to the BMI increase
that occurs with sleep curtailment. Previous studies have
shown that both acute sleep deprivationref
and chronic partial sleep deprivation (sleep restriction)ref
can cause a decrease in serum leptin concentrations. These
studies, however, were performed under highly controlled
laboratory circumstances and results validate the
association of decreased leptin with decreased sleep time
in a large sample of adults under real-life conditions
and, now, indicate a role for ghrelin. Leptin deficiency
increases appetite and produces obesityref1,
ref2.
Leptin administration suppresses food intake and reduces
energy expenditureref1,
ref2.
Importantly, low leptin as observed with sleep loss has a
greater impact on appetite than high leptin levels, which
are associated with leptin resistance, as occurs with
obesityref.
Levels of ghrelin, a potent stimulator of appetiteref1,
ref2,
ref3,
were higher in those with shorter sleep. Ghrelin levels
are also positively associated with hunger ratingsref,
but decrease with increased BMI. In one study, after 3 mo
of dietary supervision, a reduction in BMI of
approximately 5% was associated with a 12% increase in
ghrelin and a 15% decrease in leptinref.
These changes, in participants of similar BMI to our
sample and presumably producing increased appetite, are
comparable to those observed with sleep loss of 2–3
h/night. With sleep loss, however, relatively high ghrelin
and low leptin levels are associated with increased BMI.
These changes can be hypothesized to play a contributory,
rather than compensatory, role in the development of
overweight and obesity with sleep restriction. Hormone
measurements were all performed on a single fasted,
morning sample and may not reflect the 24-h profile. It is
possible that participants with shorter sleep woke up
earlier and that hormone differences may be partially
related to circadian time. Leptin and ghrelin levels rise
slightly during the nightref,
and this could result in higher hormone levels in short
sleepers. This may be an issue for ghrelin, as levels
increased with acute sleep restriction. It is, however,
unlikely to play a role in the leptin finding, since lower
levels were found with chronic but not acute sleep
restriction. Additionally, studies have shown a high
correlation between morning, fasting leptin and ghrelin
levels and 24-h mean profileref1,
ref2.
Ghrelin and leptin changes were unaffected by morningness
tendencies. The fact that studies investigating the
diurnal profile of these hormones found similar hormonal
changes over the entire 24-h period after experimental
sleep restriction also corroborates our resultsref.
The robustness of these findings and similar observations
from smaller controlled studiesref
also suggest that our statistically significant results
are unlikely to be a reflection of the number of analyses
carried out. Animal studies have suggested a link between
sleep and metabolismref.
In rats, prolonged, complete sleep deprivation increased
both food intake and energy expenditure. The net effect
was weight loss and, ultimately, deathref.
Rats fed a high protein-to-calorie diet had accelerated
weight loss, compared to sleep-deprived rats fed
calorie-augmented (fatty) diets. Food consumption remained
normal in sleep-deprived rats fed protein-rich diets, but
increased 250% in rats fed calorie-rich diets. Preference
for fatty foods has also been reported anecdotally in
sleep-deprived humans. Sleep deprivation may thus increase
not only appetite but also preference for lipid-rich,
high-calorie foods. Animal experiments that have found
weight loss after prolonged sleep deprivation have to be
interpreted in the context of a stressful procedure
producing intense sleep debtref1,
ref2,
which may interfere with adequate food intake. From our
study, we hypothesize that the moderate chronic sleep debt
associated with habitual short sleep is associated with
increased appetite and energy expenditure. In societies
where high-calorie food is freely available and
consumption uncontrolled, after milder chronic sleep
restriction, the equation may be tipped towards food
intake for high-calorie food rather than expenditure,
culminating in obesity. Short sleepers may also have more
time to overeat. Sleep loss from a baseline of 7.7 h was
associated with a dose-dependent increase in BMI. This was
the predominant effect in a population increasingly
curtailing sleepref.
Sleep > 7.7 h, however, was also associated with
increased BMI. Patients with SDB may spend a longer time
in bed to compensate for fragmented sleep; however,
controlling for AHI did not change the curvilinear
BMI–sleep association. Another possibility is that in long
sleepers, reduced energy expenditure due to increased time
in bed has a greater impact than reduced food intake. In
favor of this hypothesis, long sleepers exercise lessref.
The odds ratio of high levels of self-reported exercise
(>7 h/wk), based on a single survey question, decreased
with increased sleep time, but controlling for this
variable also did not change our findings. Insulin
resistance with sleep deprivation has been reported in a
laboratory study of young, healthy volunteersref.
When controlling for BMI, we found no significant
correlation between insulin, glucose, or adiponectin
levels and various measures of sleep duration. Also, there
was no significant correlation between QUICKI (or the
homeostatic model assessment HOMAref)
and sleep duration. This may be due to difficulties in
detecting small effects on glucose tolerance under
less-controlled conditions of large population studies.
- drugs
- maternal obesity results in increased risk for
metabolic disease in offspring. Recent studies in rodents
suggest that brain pathways controlling food intake and
energy metabolism also continue to develop postnatally,
and that perturbations during critical periods can result
in abnormal development with consequences for normal
function of these regulatory pathways. It might not seem
inevitable that overweight mothers will have fatter
babies. But this is exactly what's happening in the USA.
The proportion of overweight babies has risen by almost
two-thirds over the past 2 decades, so that 10% of babies
now fall into this category. And the proportion of babies
at the upper end of the weight scale — termed 'at risk of
becoming overweight' — has risen by a third to 14%. The
weight and height of > 120,000 children between birth
and 6 years of age were monitored : infants from birth to
6 months old showed a particularly large increase in
obesity from the 1980s to the 2000s. A mother who
gains a lot of weight during pregnancy can predispose
her child to being overweight for liferef.
In extreme cases, putting on excessive weight when
pregnant can lead to a condition called gestational
diabetes in the mother. Studies of the disorder in rats
show that it increases levels of the hormone insulin in
pups. High insulin levels then boost appetite by acting on
the hypothalamus, a part of the brain responsible for
regulating food intake. It seems the same thing can happen
with people too. Gestational diabetes can programme
babies. In less extreme cases, a mother or father's weight
may pass on messages to a developing child through egg,
sperm, or conditions in the womb: not by changes in DNA
sequence, but by altering how the DNA is expressed.
Exactly how this might happen is as yet unclear. Of
course, diet could be expected to have an effect too. Breast-fed
babies typically gain weight more slowly than those fed
on formula milk. This is in part because the
composition is different: in the first few feeds, breast
milk provides immune factors, and fattier milk comes only
later; the make-up of formula milk, however, is constant.
It is also partly because of a difference in feeding
patterns. A breast-fed baby has a lot of control over the
amount of milk it gets, whereas a bottle-fed baby has
rather little. A bottle-fed baby will be given as much as
the mother thinks they should have. But the rate of
breastfeeding has been increasing, not decreasing, as the
number of overweight babies has risen. Breastfeeding
probably goes some way towards counteracting this trend —
babies would probably be even fatter if mothers did not
breastfeed. Is it really that bad for babies to be a bit
plump? Many infants do lose their baby fat. But
overweight infants are also more likely to become
overweight adults, particularly if their appetites have
been 'programmed' at a different level. This can
predispose them to chronic disorders such as systemic
arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus.
Current aspirational values are the modern version of the
Aristostelean "good life". The assumption is that high
productivity will make the "good life" possible and technology
will fuel higher productivity. The irony is that technology
and the accompanying productivity have created a faster and
more stressful pace of life, with time pressures for us all.
We no longer have sufficient time for traditional food
preparation, which has created the demand for prepackaged and
fast food. Time pressures have fueled the need to get places
faster, which causes us to drive rather than walk, to take the
elevators instead of the stairs, and to look to technology for
ways to engineer inefficient physical activity out of our
lives. Our relentless quest for improved productivity and
efficiency has fueled increased demand for getting better and
better deals, that is, getting more for less. The entry of
large numbers of women into the workforce and the increase in
single-parent families have changed the structure of many
families and increased the value of convenience. Now, more
than ever, we value the ability to conduct many aspects of
everyday business without ever having to step out of our cars.
Our biology, which evolved in times of frequent famine, is now
essentially maladaptive in our environment of food abundance
and sedentariness. For people who lived in times of privation,
such as hunter-gatherers, food was only sporadically available
and the risk of famine was ever present. In such an
environment, genes that predispose to obesity increase energy
stores and provide a survival advantage in times of famine.
This is the so-called "thrifty gene hypothesis" put
forth by James Neel in 1962. Indeed, thrifty genes could be
imagined to be genes that lead to leptin resistance, the end
result of which would be the efficient retention of nutrients
as adipose tissue. Consistent with this idea is the finding
that obesity and an increase of plasma leptin levels,
indicative of leptin resistance, are characteristic of Pima
Indians living a "Western" life-style, whereas Pima
Indians living a more "native" life-style remain leaner and
have low leptin levels. For people descended from the
inhabitants of the Fertile Crescent or, more recently, Western
societies, the risk of starvation was markedly reduced by the
domestication of plants and animals and the ability to store
food. In this environment, selection against obesity might be
expected. Some argue that because the health consequences of
obesity generally affect people beyond child-bearing age,
genetic selection against obesity is not robust. However,
among other things, obesity is associated with gestational diabetes,
which has potentially deleterious consequences and would thus
be strongly selected against. Gestational diabetes increases
the risk of miscarriage and it can also lead to a
cephalopelvic disproportion, an event that can have
catastrophic consequences for both mother and child. Although
the health complications of obesity are often not evident
until later in life, it has also been shown that depriving
children of the care and emotional support provided by their
grandparents, expecially grandmothers, has important
consequences. A number of recent reports note the pivotal role
of grandparents in gathering food for children and emphasize
their critical role in the human social structure. In
addiction, increased adiposity is associated with an increased
risk of predation in animals. Thus, in circumstances where the
risk of starvation is reduced, one might expect genes that
resist obesity and its complications to have a selective
advantage. Such selection can, in principle, be quite rapid.
Thus, in modern times, the lean carry genes that protect them
from the consequences of obesity, whereas the obese carry
genes that are atavism of a time of nutritional privation in
which they no longer live.
Pathogenesis : peripheral and CNS
insulin
-resistance
and leptin
-resistance
- serum leptin-interacting proteins (SLIPs),
isolated by leptin-affinity chromatography and identified by
mass spectrometry and immunochemical analysis : one of the
major SLIPs is C-reactive
protein (CRP)
.
In vitro, human CRP directly inhibits the binding of
leptin to its receptors and blocks its ability to signal in
cultured cells. In vivo, infusion of human CRP into
ob/ob mice blocked the effects of leptin upon satiety and
weight reduction. In mice that express a transgene encoding
human CRP, the actions of human leptin were completely
blunted. Physiological concentrations of leptin can
stimulate expression of CRP in human primary hepatocytes.
Recently, human CRP has been correlated with increased
adiposity and plasma leptin. Thus, our results suggest a
potential mechanism contributing to leptin resistance, by
which circulating CRP binds to leptin and attenuates its
physiological functionsref.
=> hyperleptinemia and increased adipose tissue =>lipotoxicity mediated by
adipokines :
- increased TNF-a
secretion =>
down-regulation of InsR
, inhibition of NO
production by endothelial cells
- resistin
=> insulin-resistance in
skeletal muscle
- increased IL-6
=> increased hepatic
synthesis of haptoglobin
- decreased adiponectin

- increased circulating FFA => inhibition of glycogen
synthetase, GLUT-4
and hexokinase,
inhibition of NO production by endothelial cells
- increased tissue triglycerids
- increased tissue acylCoA
Most obese humans tend to have lower ghrelin
levels than people of normal
weight, but production increases in people who have lost weight
through dieting. Many think that leptin's main role is
protecting against weight loss in times of deprivation rather
than against weight gain in times of plenty : when a person's
fat stores shrink, so does leptin incretion (in response,
appetite increases while metabolism decreases), but the converse
does not happen (beyond a certain point, increased leptin
production does little to inhibit appetite or increase
metabolism).
The activity of regions involved in generating emotions in
response to and in recognition of the taste of food (middle
dorsal insula and cerebellum, precuneus, posterior cingulate,
and temporal and orbitofrontal cortices) is especially high in
obese individuals compared to the nonobese.
5,088 bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences from the distal
intestinal (cecal) microbiota of genetically obese ob/ob mice,
lean ob/+ and wild-type siblings, and their ob/+ mothers, all
fed the same polysaccharide-rich diet, were analyzed. Although
the majority of mouse gut species are unique, the mouse and
human microbiota(s) are similar at the division (superkingdom)
level, with Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominating.
Microbial-community composition is inherited from mothers.
However, compared with lean mice and regardless of kinship,
ob/ob animals have a 50% reduction in the abundance of
Bacteroidetes and a proportional increase in Firmicutes. These
changes, which are division-wide, indicate that, in this model,
obesity affects the diversity of the gut microbiota and suggest
that intentional manipulation of community structure may be
useful for regulating energy balance in obese individualsref.
In adipocytes, stimulation of b-ARs
increases cAMP levels and activates PKA, which stimulates
lipolysis by phosphorylating hormone-sensitive lipase and
perilipin. Acute insulin treatment activates PDE3B, reduces cAMP
levels and quenches b-AR
signalling. In contrast, chronic hyperinsulinaemic conditions
(typical of type 2 diabetes) enhance b-AR-mediated
cAMP production. This amplification of cAMP signalling is
paradoxical because it should enhance lipolysis, the opposite of
the known short-term effect of hyperinsulinaemia. In adipocytes,
chronically high insulin levels inhibit b-ARs
(but not other cAMP-elevating stimuli) from activating PKA.
Disruption of PKA scaffolding mimics the interference of insulin
with b-AR signalling. Chronically
high insulin levels may disrupt the close apposition of b-ARs and PKA, identifying a new
mechanism for crosstalk between heterologous signal transduction
pathwaysref.
Even if they are healthy, people with more adipose tissue also
tend to have higher levels of CRP
.
Previous research, however, had only found CRP to be produced in
liver tissue, although Drs. Yeh, Willerson and Paolo Calabro,
MD, discovered in 2003 that the protein also is manufactured in
the walls of blood vessels. But that didn't explain obesity's
connection to high levels of CRP and it also was not clear why
CRP is higher in patients who have metabolic disorders. So the
research team decided to see whether fat cells themselves could
be stimulated by inflammatory cytokines or resistin
to
produce CRP. To help find out, plastic surgery patients at M.D.
Anderson donated adipose tissue that would have been discarded,
and the research team then isolated fat cells, cultured them and
stimulated them under a number of different conditions. The
cells produced cytokines that resulted in inflammation and that
this process triggered production of high levels of CRP.
Resistin, produced itself by fat cells, could stimulate
production of CRP. Patients with metabolic syndromes have higher
levels of CRPs, as well as a higher risk of developing heart
disease and stroke, but no one understands why that is. Aspirin,
statins and troglitazone can reduce CRP levels in cultured fat
cells that were producing high levels of CRPsref
Visceral fat distribution :
- ginoid obesity
(diffuse but mainly in glutei and hips; pear-shaped)
- android obesity
(inner omentum; apple-shaped) is more dangerous than diffuse
one and is graded with abdominal circumference
- > 88 cm for females
- > 102 cm for males
The value can be corrected measuring circumference at glutei
height as waist-hip ratio (WHR) :
- > 0.9 in males
- > 0.8 in females
... but WHR has a lower prognostic value.
Therapy :
- behavioral therapy
- calorie
restriction

- limit fat assumption to 30% of daily calories
- 10% from saturated fatty acids
- 10% from monounsaturated fatty acids
- 10% from PUFAs
- limit cholesterol assumption to 200 mg / day
- eat vegetables to reduce cholesterol assorption
- limit assumption of ethanol and coffeee
- there is insufficient evidence to make
recommendations for or against the use of low-carbohydrate
diets
,
particularly among participants older than age 50 years,
for use > 90 days, or for diets < 20 g/d of
carbohydrates. Among the published studies, participant
weight loss while using low-carbohydrate diets was
principally associated with decreased caloric intake and
increased diet duration but not with reduced
carbohydrate contentref.
Indeed, a low carbohydrate diet appears to help patients
lose more weight than other diets up until the 6-month
mark. But by 1 year, the difference between
low-carbohydrate and low fat diets disappears. Doctors
should help patients choose a diet that helps them
reduce portion size and that includes a healthy eating
lifestyle they can stick to. Preliminary research on new
internet-based weight loss programs suggests the
technology may be a useful tool for some patients.
Overweight patients who have access to online weight
loss resources lost on average 1.6 kg over 6 months.
Subjects who also submitted calorie and exercise
information to an online bulletin board and received
weekly e-mail counseling and feedback lost considerably
more, or 4.1 kg over the same time periodref1,
ref2.
- active lifestyle
- gene therapy

- chemotherapy
- HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitors
(atorvastatin 10 mg daily is safe and efficacious in
reducing the risk of first cardiovascular disease events
(acute coronary heart disease events, coronary
revascularisation, or stroke) by 33% (48% for stroke) and
death rate by 27% in patients with type 2 diabetes without
high LDL-cholesterol
- lipase
inhibitors
(orlistat) interfere with fatty acid hydrolysis and uptake
by the gut, but produces only modest weight loss and may
have unwelcome side effects
- PTP1B
inhibitors

- CNTF
allows the body to establish a new, svelter set point
- CB1
antagonists
(rimonabant : these receptors support "the munchies", the
food-craving effects of marijuana)ref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4.
Recently reported phase III clinical trails show that
2-year treatment with rimonabant reduced weight, reduced
abdominal fat, and improved cardiovascular risk factorsref1,
ref2.
The first in a new class of pharmaceutical agents,
rimonabant is promising as an anti-obesity therapy, but
its clinical value compared with that of existing
therapies must await results of future investigations.
- MC1R inhibitors

- MC3R agonists

- MC4R agonists

- antagonists of the receptor for melanin-concentrating
hormone
- GLP-1
.
Exendin-4 is a 39–amino acid peptide originally isolated
from the saliva of the Gila Monster that resists
degradation by DPP-IV while retaining GLP-1–like effects
on glucose metabolism and food intakeref.
Activity of GLP-1 is prolonged by conjugation to albumin
(liraglutide) or inhibition of DPP-IV
- amylin
causes weight loss in diabetic cohorts, but its efficacy
in the general population is uncertain
- PYY(3–36) : a number of formulations are
currently under development as obesity therapeutics,
although effective small-molecule mimics are lacking
- stimulation of endogenous GLP-1 and PYY(3–36) secretion
by specific L cell secretagogues is a promising
avenue that remains to be exploited
- ghrelin may ameliorate anorexiaref,
but the efficacy of ghrelin antagonists for treatment of
obesity remains unproven
- whether energy balance will be improved in humans by inhibition
of 11ß-HSD1
or
alternatively activation of PPAR
, as suggested
by studies of OEA action, will await the results of
clinical trials.
- b3
agonists
=> lipolysis
- leptin
replacement is effective in the rare cases of human leptin
deficiencyref,
but leptin resistance limits its utility in ordinary
obesity. Increasing leptin action by promoting its
transport into the brain or by antagonizing inhibitors of
leptin signaling pathways might be effective, but the
relevant pharmaceutical targets have proven challenging
- CNTF
acts through leptin-like pathways in the hypothalamus.
Although effective in animal models, human obesity trials
were limited by neutralizing antibodiesref.
- inhibition of angiogenesis by VEGFR2
blocking antibody not only reduces angiogenesis and tissue
growth but also inhibits preadipocyte differentiation :
part of this inhibition stems from the paracrine
interaction between endothelial cells and preadipocytes
and that VEGF-VEGFR2 signaling in endothelial cells, but
not preadipocytes, mediates this process.
- anorexiants
(sibutramine) produce only modest weight loss and may have
unwelcome side effects
- current medications offer 5-8% weight loss when
subtracted for a placebo effect. And when taken in
combination with behavior modification therapy, the drugs
appear to facilitate even more weight lossref.
However, treatment probably needs to be life long, many
insurers will not cover the cost, and the drugs may not be
safe for long-term therapy. Some evidence suggests weight
loss drugs may not have to be taken consistently over the
long term. Preliminary research shows that intermittent
therapy with the drug sibutramine may deliver the same
results over the long term as it does when taken in
uninterrupted therapyref.
- overweight mice treated with s.c. (prohibitin (helps to
regulate the growth of blood vessels in white adipose
tissue cells)-binding CKGGRAKDC peptide)-(proapoptotic
peptide) fusion protein each day for 4 weeks ate less food
and lost 30% of their original weight, but remained
healthyref
- bariatric surgery
(BS) : 15,000,000 adults in the USA meet current
guidelines for surgical intervention to treat obesityref.
Once a last resort, surgery is increasing rapidly as a means
of weight control, from approximately 15,000 annual
procedures in the early 1990s to 109,000 operations in the
USA in 2003ref.
Bariatric surgery can achieve substantial and long-term
weight loss and can improve or in some cases cure diabetes,
hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea.
If untreated, morbidly obese patients have a 1 in 7 chance
of reaching normal life expectancy.
Indications : majority of
skeletal maturity (generally > or =13 years of age for
girls and > or =15 years of age for boys)
- BMI > 40 kg/mBSA2 (body weight
> 45 kg above ideal weight)
- BMI = 35-39 kg/mBSA2 + plus at
least one severe obesity-related medical complication such
as systemic arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes
mellitus, heart failure, or OSA, skeletal diseases
After diet trials, exclusion of hypothyroidism or adrenal
diseases and psychiatric evaluation (risk for malpractice
litigations in BPD
patients).
At the last review of the literature, there were 43 different
operations or modifications thereof used for the control of
obesity. An effective operation for obesity control should
produce a significant weight loss (>/= 25% excess weight
loss) to ameliorate the associated medico-sociopsycho-economic
ramifications of the obesity. The operative and postoperative
significant morbidity should be < 20% and mortality <
1%. The weight lost should be maintained for a long period
(>/= 5 years). The effects of the operation should be
reproducible and documentable by > 2 authors working
independently. Based on these criteria, questionable
operations for treatment of obesity include: tooth wiring, acupuncture
,
hypothalamic center manipulation, liposuction
, balloon insertion,
unbanded gastric
partitioning
, vagotomy
, gastrogastrostomy
,
horizontal gastroplasty
,
gastric wrap, gastroclip, and any variety of gastroplasty
without a reinforced stoma, intestinal bypass, duodenal bypass
and biliointestinal bypassref.
All bariatric surgical procedures have been performed as open
and laparoscopic procedures.
- malabsorptive surgery
- restrictive surgery
=> metabolic complications : vomiting, excessive weight
loss, PEM
,
impaired immunocompetence, vitamin deficiency, expecially
thiamine with neuropathy/encephalopathy, hair loss,
gallstone formation; anemia, iron and vitamin B12
deficiency, dumping for gastric bypass
- implantable
gastric
stimulation (IGS) system

- liposuction

Effect of different bariatric surgical procedures on long-term
(>2 y) body weight :
It is difficult to determine the relative weight loss
effectiveness of each procedure because only vertical banded
gastroplasty and gastric bypass have been compared directly in
RCTs. The data from these RCTs consistently revealed that
weight loss was greater with the gastric bypass procedure than
with vertical banded gastroplasty. Fewer studies have
evaluated the long-term effects of gastric banding,
biliopancreatic diversion, and biliopancreatic diversion with
duodenal switch than gastric bypass or gastroplasty because
the procedure has been more recently developed or has been
performed less often. The perioperative mortality rate within
30 days after open bariatric surgery is about 1% but can vary
depending on the experience of the surgeon. Approximately 75%
of deaths are caused by anastomotic leaks and peritonitis
and
25% by pulmonary
embolism
.
Laparoscopic gastric bypass is associated with fewer wound
complications, less postoperative pain, less blood loss, and
shorter hospital stays and convalescence periods than does the
open procedure; however, late anastomotic strictures occur
more frequently after the laparoscopic than after the open
procedure.
Peripheral neuropathy (PN) occurs more frequently after BS
than after another abdominal surgery. The three clinical
patterns of PN after BS are sensory-predominant
polyneuropathy, mononeuropathy, and radiculoplexus neuropathy.
Malnutrition may be the most important risk factor, and
patients should attend nutritional clinics. Inflammation and
altered immunity may play a role in the pathogenesis, but
further study is neededref.
Patients who are male, older (>50 yrs), heavier (BMI >60
kg/m2), and who have complications requiring
reoperation will likely need intensive care. Additionally,
males, heavier patients (BMI >60 kg/m2),
pulmonary co-morbidity, and need for reoperation may warrant
need for extended mechanical ventilation (MV) >24 hoursref.
Alcohol or drug addiction and concomitant serious disease are
contraindications for bariatric surgery. Before operation, a
full assessment is needed to identify possible eating
behaviour disturbances and associated comorbidity such as
cardiovascular disease, sleep apnoea, metabolic and
psychiatric alterations which might induce intra and
postoperative complications. Surgical techniques can be
classified as restrictive, malabsortive and mixed procedures.
Gastroplasty and adjustable gastric banding are restrictive
techniques, which are indicated in obese patients with body
mass index less than 45 kg/m2. Mixed techniques are
the most used procedures. They include gastric by-pass which
causes a reduction of 60-70% of weight excess, biliopancreatic
diversion and duodenal switch which can eliminate a 75% of
body weight excess. Following bariatric surgery a dramatic
improvement in associated comorbidity can be demonstrated,
specially in what refers to diabetes, hypertension,
dislipidaemia and apnoea. Postoperative mortality is around
1-2%. Peritonitis and venous thromboembolism are the most
serious complications. Inferior vena cava filter placement is
not only feasible and safe for the morbidly obese individual
undergoing gastric bypass, but should be strongly considered
for patients with risk factors for thromboembolic
complications or who experience postoperative complications
requiring ICU stay or prolonged immobilityref.
Postoperative follow-up should be lifelong and requires a
progressive nutrition planning and vitamin supplementation.
Obesity is a protective factor for :
Complications :
- insulin
-resistance =>
hyperinsulinemia => type II diabetes
mellitus
- secondary dyslipidemias => systemic
arterial
hypertension
=>
- coronary
artery
diseases (CAD)
.
Overweight children (age 5-23) are also at risk of heart
attacks : the greater the BMI, the greater the incidence
and severity of left ventricular mass or thickness.
- stroke

- hyperuricemia
=> gout
- osteoarthrosis

- gall-stones

- restrictive
pulmonary
disease
=> asthma
& hypercapnia => Pickwick
disease
/ pickwickian or obesity-hypoventilation syndrome
[from the description of Joe, the fat boy in Charles
Dickens' Pickwick Papers] : a complex of obesity,
somnolence, snoring, hypoventilation, and erythrocytosis
- hyperandrogenism => polycystic
ovary
syndrome (PCOS) & dysmenorrhoea
=> infertility

- reduced GH and testosterone incretion
- increased cortisol
incretion
- cancers
- acanthosis
nigricans

- chronic venous stasis leads to elephantiasis nostras
verrucosaref
- depression

- Alzheimer's
disease (AD)
(demented women in their 80's are more likely to have an
average BMI of 28 at 70 years of age : each additional point
raises the risk of AD by 36%). Patients with diabetes can
experience anything from short-term memory loss to
Alzheimer's-like symptoms and leptin is the key. An
increasing number of reports show that abnormal levels of
leptin can significantly alter brain cell function :
intrahippocampal injection of leptin increases long-term
potentiation
,
which provides a cellular basis for memory and learningref.
From studies of individual neurons isolated in a dish, the
amount of leptin produced by normal food intake in rats
boosts long-term potentiation by 3 times. But increasing the
dose 100-fold abolishes this effect. So could abnormally
high leptin levels in children with weight problems be
hindering their ability to perform in school? Given the
increasing incidence of obesity in the young, researchers
should investigate the potential link. Understanding the
role of leptin secretion in metabolic disorders will help
explain why these illnesses increase the risk of impaired
cognitive function. It may tell us about what goes wrong in
these diseases, which could serve as targets for treatments.
- real and immediate costs of obesity : normal-weight men
spent an average of $22.84 per month at the pharmacy.
Overweight men averaged $39.27 per month, and obese men
spent $80.31 per month – about 3.5 times what their
normal-weight counterparts spent. For normal-weight men,
prescriptions for CHD risk factors cost $9.89 per month, and
those for other medical conditions cost $12.96 per month.
For overweight men, CHD-related prescriptions cost $18.41
per month and other prescriptions $20.86. For obese men,
CHD-related drugs cost $42.02 per month and other drugs were
$38.29. All major CHD risk factors except smoking increased
as BMI class increased. The prevalence of low back
pain/degenerative joint disease, erectile dysfunction, sleep
apnea, gastroesophageal reflux, depression and gout
increased as BMI increased.
- weightism : weight racism, associating the image
of obese with ridiculousness, poor school grades, social
isolation, negative body image, low self-esteem, delayed or
inadequate psychosocial development, early puberty,
exclusion from sport or modern activities
Obesity is an important risk factor for coronary heart disease
(CHD), ventricular dysfunction, congestive heart failure,
stroke, and cardiac arrhythmias. Weight loss in obese patients
can improve or prevent many of the obesity-related risk factors
for CHD (ie, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus,
dyslipidemia, hypertension, and inflammation) 1,2 and can
improve diastolic function.3 Therefore, it is important for
cardiovascular healthcare professionals to understand the
clinical effects of weight loss and be able to implement
appropriate weight-management strategies in obese patients. The
purpose of this statement is to review the physiological and
cardiovascular effects of weight loss and provide clinicians
with appropriate treatment guidelines for weight management in
patients with obesity and cardiovascular disease.
Clinical effects of weight loss
Body Composition
The increase in body fat mass in most obese persons represents
primarily an increase in the size of fat cells, although the
number of fat cells may also be increased, particularly in
people with childhood-onset obesity.4 In addition, the specific
distribution of excess fat can influence the relationship
between obesity and cardiac disease. Excess abdominal adipose
tissue, particularly visceral fat, and excess triglyceride
content in liver, skeletal muscle, and heart tissues are
associated with hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin resistance,
impaired ventricular function, and increased CHD.5–9 Although an
energy deficit of 3500 kcal is needed tooxidize 1 lb of adipose
tissue, a 3500-kcal energy deficit will cause a 1-lb loss in
body weight because of the oxidation of lean tissue and
associated water losses. Approximately 75% of weight lost by
dieting is composed of fat and 25% is fat-free mass (FFM).10 The
addition of exercise training to a diet program can decrease the
percentage of weight lost as FFM by half.10,11 Most, if not all,
of the loss of fat results from a decrease in the size
(triglyceride content) of existing fat cells,12 not a decrease
in the number of fat cells.13 The distribution of fat loss is
heterogeneous, with greater relative losses of intraabdominal
fat than total body fat mass, particularly in men and women with
increased initial intraabdominal fat mass.14 In addition,
diet-induced weight loss decreases intramyocellular15 and
intrahepatic16 lipids.
Clinical Outcomes
Intentional weight loss can improve or prevent many of the
obesity-related risk factors for CHD (ie, insulin resistance and
type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and
inflammation). Moreover, these metabolic benefits are often
found after only modest weight loss (5% of initial weight)and
continue to improve in a monotonic fashion with increasing
weight loss.17
Metabolic Syndrome
The metabolic syndrome represents a constellation of physical
and metabolic abnormalities that are risk factors for
cardiovascular disease. The characteristics of this syndrome, as
defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High
Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III [ATP
III]), include large waist circumference, insulin-resistant
glucose metabolism (impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose
tolerance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus), dyslipidemia (high
triglyceride and low serum HDL-C
[cholesterol] concentrations), and increased blood pressure.18
Patients who have the metabolic syndrome have a 1.5- to 3-fold
increase in the risk of CHD and stroke.19–21 Weight loss can
improve all features of the metabolic syndrome.17
Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Insulin sensitivity, with regard to glucose metabolism, improves
rapidly after beginning an energy-deficit diet before much
weight loss occurs and continues to improve with continued
weight loss.22 In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes
mellitus, a 5% weight loss at the end of 1 year of dietary
therapy can decrease fasting blood glucose, insulin, HbA1c
concentrations, and the dose of oral hypoglycemic therapy,23
whereas an average weight loss of 30% in extremely obese
patients with diabetes after gastric bypass surgery resulted in
normalization of blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin
concentrations in 83% of patients.24 Weight loss can also
prevent the development of new diabetes in high-risk persons who
are overweight or obese.25–28Lifestyle dietary and activity
modifications, which resulted in modest (5%) weight loss,
decreased the 4- to 6-year
cumulative incidence of diabetes by 50% in men andwomen who
were overweight or obese and had impaired glucose
tolerance.25,26 The Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) Study
demonstrated that greater weight losses (16% of body weight)
induced by gastric surgery in patients who are
extremely obese (initial BMI of 41 kg/m2) were
associated with a 5-fold decrease in the cumulative incidence of
diabetes for 8 years.27
Dyslipidemia
Weight loss decreases serum LDL-C and triglyceride
concentrations, whereas increases in serum HDL-C typically are
seen when weight loss is sustained.1,29,30 The greatest relative
improvements in serum triglyceride and LDL-C usually occur
within the first 2 months of weight loss.31 The beneficial
effects on serum lipids are related to the percentage of weight
lost, and regaining the lost weight leads to a relapse in serum
concentrations. A sustained weight loss of 5% is needed
tomaintain a decrease in serum triglyceride concentrations,
whereas serum total and LDL-C revert toward baseline if a 10%
diet-induced weight loss is not maintained.31,32 Incontrast,
data from the SOS study showed that an average weight loss of
33% at 2 years after bariatric surgery decreased serum
triglyceride concentrations and increased serum HDL-C
concentrations, but it did not affect serum total cholesterol.2
Hypertension
Weight loss decreases both systolic and diastolic blood pressure
in a dose-dependent fashion; therefore, greater weight loss is
generally associated with greater improvement in blood
pressure.33,34 Weight regain results in a steady increase in
blood pressure toward baseline. The results of retrospective
analyses of large surgical group experiences showed that marked
weight loss induced by gastric surgery improved or completely
resolved hypertension in 67% ofpatients.35,36 In contrast, data
from the SOS study revealed that on average blood pressure began
to progressively increase 2 years after surgery.27 Most subjects
enrolled in the SOS study underwent vertical banded gastroplasty
or gastric banding procedures and lost less weight than those
who underwent gastric bypass. Subjects who had gastric bypass
surgery maintained a decrease in both systolic and diastolic
blood pressure for 5 years after surgery.37 Diet-induced weight
loss can prevent the development of hypertension in persons who
are obese. The results from large epidemiological studies and
intervention trials suggest that the risk of developing
hypertension in normotensive women is inversely correlated with
changes in body weight.33,38 Data from the SOS study showed,
however, that the beneficial effect of gastric surgery-induced
weight loss in preventing new cases of hypertension disappeared
3 years after surgery, despite persistent weight loss.27
Pulmonary disease
Obesity is associated with altered pulmonary function. A marked
excess in abdominal fat mass can mechanically interfere with
lung function because of the increased weight on the chest wall
and thoracic cage. In addition, obesity is associated with
serious pulmonary diseases, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and
obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS). OSA is characterized by
multiple episodes of apnea and hypopnea during sleep caused by
partial or complete upper airway obstruction. The interruption
in nighttime sleep and hypoxemia causes daytime sleepiness and
cardiopulmonary dysfunction. Episodes of oxygen desaturation
during apnea and hypopnea cause transient increases in pulmonary
artery and pulmonary wedge pressures, and myocardial perfusion
defects.39 Over time, electrocardiographic abnormalities and
cardiac rhythm alterations, permanent pulmonary hypertension,
right ventricle hypertrophy, and bilateral leg edema can
develop.40–42 OHS is caused by a decreased ventilatory response
to
hypercapnia, hypoxia, or hypercapnia and hypoxia and inadequate
respiratory muscle strength to meet the increased ventilatory
demand caused by the mechanical effects of obesity. Patients
with OHS have shallow and inefficient breathing, and a pCO2 50
mm Hg. Patients may become more symptomatic when lying down
because abdominal pressure pushes up the diaphragm, which
increases intrathoracic pressure and reduces respiratory
capacity. Pickwickian syndrome is a severe form of OHS and is
associated with extreme obesity, irregular breathing, cyanosis,
somnolence, and right ventricular dysfunction.
Inflammation
Obesity is associated with an increase in circulating
inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP)43–45
and cytokines (ie, interleukin-6 [IL-6], IL-18, and P-selectin).
46–49 Adipose tissue itself is a likely source of these excess
cytokines,46,50 and IL-6 stimulates the production of
CRP by the liver.51 The increase in inflammatory markers is
associated with insulin resistance52–56 and is an important
predictor of atherosclerotic events.57–61 Data from studies that
have ranged in duration from 3 months to 2 years have revealed
that weight reduction decreases plasma CRP
concentration.49,52,62–67 The decrease in CRP is directly
related to the amount of weight loss, fat mass, and change in
waist circumference. In one study, only subjects who were
insulin resistant experienced a weight loss–induced decrease in
CRP, an effect that paralleled changes in insulin sensitivity.52
Plasma CRP concentrations did not decrease and insulin
sensitivity did not increase in subjects who were insulin
sensitive before weight reduction. Decreases in plasma
IL-6,48,49,65,67–69 IL-18,49,67 P-selectin,48 and tumor necrosis
factor-48 concentrations have also been reported66,68,69 after
weight loss in subjects who are obese.
Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction
Overweight and obesity are associated with cardiac autonomic
neuropathy. For example, a 10% increase in body weight is
associated with a decline in parasympathetic tone and an
increase in heart rate.70 Alterations in autonomic nervous
system function might be an important cause of cardiovascular
disease events and mortality, as suggested by the relationship
between heart rate and cardiovascular disease mortality.71,72
Marked weight loss induced by bariatric surgery increases vagal
activity.73 In addition, weight loss achieved by dieting also
increases cardiac parasympathetic activity,74–77 but this
increase is not maintained in the absence of sustained weight
loss.77
Cardiovascular disease
Although weight loss modifies many cardiovascular disease (CVD)
risk factors, it is not known whether weight reduction decreases
CVD events or CVD mortality in obese persons. 78–80 This
important question has not yet been answered because it is
difficult to achieve prolonged periods of sustained weight
reduction (eg, 5 years) with nonsurgicaltherapy81 and to
perform prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
involving bariatric surgery. Data from the SOS study showed that
despite a greater reduction in weight and CVD risk factors after
surgical than medical therapy for obesity, no difference in
cardiovascular disease events or mortality was found at 10
years.82 Data from large population studies have revealed that
obesity is associated with increased CVD mortality.83–87
Moreover, CVD death rates are directly related to BMI in both
men and women. The risk of CVD mortality in obese persons who
have a BMI 35 kg/m2 was 2 to 3 times the riskamong lean persons
(BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2),88 and a 30% higher CHD mortality rate
occurs for every 5-unit increment of BMI.89 In addition,
overweight in adolescence is associated with a 130% increased
risk of CHD mortality in adulthood.90 In general, data from
large epidemiological studies have shown that weight variability
is associated with an increased rate of CVD mortality.91 The
interpretation of the results from these studies is complicated
because many studies assessed
weight variability rather than weight loss, included large
numbers of lean and mildly overweight subjects, and included
subjects who experienced “unintentional” weight loss, which may
have been caused by diseases that influence mortality.
Therefore, the available data are not adequate to reliably
determine whether intentional weight loss affects CVD mortality,
and carefully designed RCTs are needed to address this issue.
Cardiovascular Structure and Function
Obesity, particularly severe obesity, is associated with
abnormalities in cardiac structure and function.8,92 The
severity of these defects is associated with both the degree and
duration of obesity.93 Obesity is associated with an increase in
total blood volume and cardiac output and a decrease in
peripheral vascular resistance.8,94 In this setting, ventricular
filling pressures are elevated,95 which eventually results in
increased wall stress, diastolic dysfunction, and left
ventricular hypertrophy. 93,96,98 Abnormalities of the right
heart can also occur and may represent a combination of left
heart disease, recurrent pulmonary thromboemboli, and OSA or
hypoventilation or both.99 Finally, lipomatous deposition in the
interatrial septum has also been described100; however, this
anatomic alteration is unlikely to contribute to cardiac
dysfunction. Weight loss, particularly in persons who are
severely obese, can improve cardiac structure and function.3,101
Improvements in fractional shortening are associated with
decreases in hypertension and left ventricular internal
dimension with reduced atrial and left ventricular free and
septal wall thickness. Moreover, improvements in left
ventricular
diastolic filling and ejection fraction also occur.102
Improvements in left ventricular mass occur in both normotensive
and hypertensive patients and are independent of the reduction
in blood pressure.103,104 In addition, adding exercise to a
lowcalorie diet (LCD) may produce greater benefits in cardiac
structure105,106; however, these benefits are not consistent
across all studies.107,108 For example, substantial weight loss
(15% of baseline)108 and modest weight loss plus physical
training109 did not have beneficial cardiac effects in obese
adolescents. At present, the potential benefits of weight loss
on cardiac function are not completely clear and require further
study.
Clinical efficacy of obesity therapies
The goals of obesity therapy include decreasing body fat to
improve appearance, physical function, quality of life, and
medical health. Although surgical removal of large amounts of
subcutaneous adipose tissue (20% of total body fat mass) can
improve a person’s appearance, ability to ambulate, and
quality of life, it does not improve the metabolic CHD risk
factors associated with obesity110; it seems that fat loss
induced by negative energy balance is necessary to achieve
metabolic benefits. Current therapies available for weight
management that cause weight loss by inducing a negative energy
balance include dietary intervention, physical activity,
pharmacotherapy, and surgery. Behavior modification to enhance
dietary and activity compliance is an important component of all
of these treatments.
Dietary intervention
Many different diets have been proposed for the treatment of
obesity. These dietary approaches vary in their total energy
prescription, macronutrient (fat, carbohydrate, and protein)
content, energy density, glycemic index, and portion control.
The energy content of a diet is the primary determinant of
weight loss. Very-low-calorie diets (VLCDs) provide 800kcal/d,
LCDs usually contain 800 to 1500 kcal/d, and a balanced-deficit
diet usually provides 1500 kcal/d. An LCD usually causes an 8%
loss of body weight at 6 months ftreatment. The results from
clinical trials may not reflect the experience in clinical
practice because these trials involved subjects who volunteered
for a weight loss study and often included formal behavior
modification as part of the study protocol. The use of a VLCD
usually produces a weight loss of 15% to 20% within 4
months111–113; however, VLCDs are associated with poorer weight
loss maintenance and a greater weight regain than are LCDs, so
weight loss at 1 year after treatment with a VLCD does not
differ from treatment with an LCD.113 In addition, treatment
with a VLCD may be particularly problematic for patients with
CHD because of the risk of diet-induced hypokalemia,
dehydration, and gallstones. The macronutrient composition of a
diet does not affect the rate of weight loss unless
macronutrient manipulation influences total energy intake or
expenditure. The Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation,
and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults convened by
the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and
Blood Institute recommended a 500- to 1000-kcal/d deficit diet
for obese persons, which will initially result in a weekly
weight loss of 1 to 2 lb (0.45 to 0.9 kg). It is often
difficult, however, to accurately determine a patient’s daily
energy requirements. Therefore, calorie-intake guidelines for a
weight-loss diet have been suggested based on a patient’s
initial body weight (Table 1).114 The calorie content of any
prescribed diet must be adjusted regularly, based on the
patient’s weight-loss response and treatment goals. A low-fat
diet is considered the standard approach for the treatment of
obesity.1 Data from diet intervention studies
support the notion that decreasing fat intake, even while
allowing ad libitum intake of carbohydrates and proteins, causes
a spontaneous decrease in total energy intake and weight
loss.115 In addition, a survey of obese persons who were
successful at maintaining long-term weight loss found
that they consumed 25% of calories from fats.116 However, a
recent systematic review of randomized controlled studies that
were specifically conducted to evaluate dietary therapy for
obesity found that weight loss induced by low-fat diets and
other weight-reducing diets were similar.117 The composite of
these data suggests that low-fat diets can enhance weight loss
and may be particularly useful in selected persons, but they are
not necessarily more effective than LCDs. The use of
low-carbohydrate diets has become increasingly popular. Several
RCTs compared the effect of lowcarbohydrate, high-protein,
high-fat diets (eg, the Atkins diet) with a conventional low-fat
diet (30% energy from fats) inadults118–123 or a very-low-fat
diet (12% energy from fats) in adolescents.124 In all studies,
weight loss at 3 and 6 months in subjects randomized to the
low-carbohydrate diet was 2 times as great (4- to 5-kg greater
weight loss) as thoserandomized to the low-fat group. In 2
studies that observed
patients for 1 year, weight loss at 1 year was not significantly
different between groups, however.121,122 In general, these
studies also found the low-carbohydrate diet was more beneficial
in serum triglyceride and HDL-C concentrations as compared with
the low-fat diet, but the low-fat diet was more beneficial in
serum LDL-C concentration. Although these changes in
triglycerides and HDL-C after weight reduction on
low-carbohydrate diets appear favorable, it is not known whether
these alterations are associated with long-term beneficial
effects on CHD.125 The type of carbohydrate consumed also may be
involved in regulating energy intake, and a low glycemic index
diet has been proposed as a treatment for obesity. The glycemic
index refers to the increase in blood glucose that occurs after
consuming a fixed amount (usually 50 g) of available
carbohydrate from a test food relative to the increase in blood
glucose that occurs after consuming the same amount of available
carbohydrate from either glucose or white bread.126,127 Most
refined grain products and potatoes have a high glycemic index,
whereas most fruits, legumes, and nonstarchy vegetables have a
low glycemic index. The glycemic response to a specific food
that is ingested as part of a meal can be altered by many
factors, such as the method of
preparation and the effect of concomitantly ingested foods on
TABLE 1. Suggested Energy and Macronutrient Composition of
Initial Reduced-Calorie Diet
Body Weight, lb
Suggested Energy
Intake, kcal/d
150–199 1000
200–249 1200
250–299 1500
300–349 1800
350 2000
Klein et al Clinical Implications of Obesity 2955
intestinal motility. Data from a small (n14)
randomizedcontrolled 1-year trial conducted in overweight
adolescents revealed that a reduced glycemic index diet resulted
in a greater decrease in body weight and BMI than did a
reduced-fat diet.128 The writing group is unaware of any RCTs
evaluating the effect of a low glycemic index diet on body
weight in adults. The use of low-energy-density foods may be
another effective approach for treating obesity. The energy
density of a diet is defined as the calories present in a given
weight of food. A food’s energy density is directly correlated
with its
fat content and inversely correlated with its water content.
Energy intake during a meal is partially regulated by the weight
of ingested food and is inversely correlated with energy
density.129 Moreover, the results of a 6-month RCT demonstrated
that providing subjects with ad libitum low-fat
and low-energy-density foods causes modest (1% to 2%) weight
loss.130 Portion control is an important aspect of reducing
energy intake. During ad libitum feeding, a direct relationship
is found between portion size served and intake; therefore,
increasing the size of the portion served increases the amount
of food consumed.131 Providing prepackaged prepared meals,
either as frozen entrees of mixed foods or liquid-formula meal
replacements
improves portion control and can enhance weight loss. Data from
RCTs have shown that obese persons who were given prepackaged
prepared meals or liquid-formula meal replacements lost several
kilograms more weight than did those who were randomized to a
standard diet.132–134 Educating patients about food labels,
recipe modification, restaurant ordering, social eating, and
healthy cooking methods are also important to help patients
understand portion size and energy intake during meals and
snacks. In summary, the data from RCTs demonstrate that
different dietary interventions can cause short-term weight
loss. At the present time, we suggest that patients who are
overweight or obese and trying to lose weight consume a diet
that induces an energy deficit of 500 to 1000 kcal/d and has a
macronutrient composition that is known to reduce the risk of
CVD. This diet involves (1) consuming a variety of fruits,
vegetables, grains, low-fat or nonfat dairy products, fish,
legumes, poultry, and lean meats; (2) limiting intake of foods
that are high in saturated fat, trans-fatty acids, and
cholesterol; and (3) following the current dietary guidelines of
the American Heart Association135 and the NCEP ATP III18 (Table
2). These recommendations may require modification, based on the
results of ongoing and future dietary therapy studies. The key
to successful weight management is to provide patients with a
dietary regimen that results in long-term compliance. The
available data suggest that it is unlikely that one approach is
appropriate for all patients.
Physical activity
Regular physical activity has important health benefits. A
consensus public health recommendation for physical activity
developed in the mid-1990s proposed that sedentary adults should
accumulate 30 minutes of at least moderate-intensity physical
activity (eg, brisk walking) on most but preferably all days of
the week.136–138 The health benefits of 30 minutes of daily
moderate-intensity physical activity apply to all persons. Data
from several studies show that persons who are overweight or
obese and physically active (ie, participate in 30 minutes of
moderate-intensity physical
activity most days of the week) or who have moderate to high
levels of cardiorespiratory fitness (ie, in the upper four
fifths of the age and sex fitness distributions) have much lower
death rates from cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality
than people who are sedentary and unfit.87,139–143 Therefore,
regular physical activity may improve survival in persons who
are overweight or obese, independent of weight loss. Weight loss
results from a negative energy balance, which can be achieved by
decreasing energy intake, increasing energy expenditure, or
both. It is usually much easier to
induce a daily energy deficit by restricting energy intake than
by increasing energy expenditure. The calories consumed during
physical activity can be estimated as a function of a metabolic
equivalent task (MET) score. One MET is the energy consumed
during resting conditions, such as television
viewing, and is equal to 1 kcal/kg of body weight per hour.
Other activities such as carrying packages, doing housework or
gardening (2 to 5 METs), walking at a pace of 3 to 4 mph (3 to 4
METs), and jogging (8 to 10 METs) consume greater amounts of
energy. A person weighing 90 kg would need to walk briskly for 4
to 5 h/d to increase his or her energy expenditure above resting
metabolic rate by an amount that is equivalent to reducing
energy intake by 750 to 1000 kcal/d. Therefore, it is difficult
to lose a substantial amount of weight through physical
activity. A review of 19 studies with randomized designs showed
that exercise plus diet caused a 0.1-kg/wk greater weight loss
than did diet alone.144 Weight loss induced by combining
physical activity with diet decreases the loss of FFM that
occurs when weight loss is induced by diet alone.145 Data from
observational studies strongly support the notion that physical
activity is critical for preventing weight regain. 145,146
Moreover, the available evidence suggests that a high volume of
physical activity, 80 to 90 minutes of moderate-intensity
activity such as walking or 35 minutes of vigorous activity such
as jogging, is necessary to maintain weight loss.145 The
interpretation of the results from these
TABLE 2. Suggested Dietary Nutrient Composition for
Patients Who Are Overweight or Obese Nutrient Recommended Intake
Saturated fat1,2 7% of total calories
Monounsaturated fat 20% of total calories
Polyunsaturated fat 10% of total calories
Total fat 25% to 35% or less of total calories
Carbohydrate3 50% to 60% or more of total calories (complex
carbohydrates from a variety of vegetables, fruits, whole
grains)
Fiber 20–30 g/d
Protein 15% of total calories
Cholesterol 200 mg/d
studies is complicated because subjects who achieved successful
long-term weight loss had chosen to be physically active and had
not been randomized a priori to a high-volume physical activity
program. Data from a recent prospective RCT revealed that
high-volume physical activity did not
completely prevent weight regain.147 Nonetheless, weight regain
after 6 months was smaller and total weight loss was greater at
12 and 18 months in obese subjects who were randomized to
dietary and behavior therapy plus high-volume physical activity
(2500 kcal of energy expenditure per week)
than they were in persons randomized to dietary and behavior
therapy plus conventional physical activity (1000 kcal of energy
expenditure per week). Although it is in general difficult to
achieve long-term adherence to an exercise program, several
approaches have been used to enhance adoption and maintenance of
physical activity. Behavior-intervention strategies originally
developed for smoking cessation or dietary programs have been
used to increase physical activity. One study showed comparable
improvements over 24 months in activity, fitness, and CHD risk
factors for participants who were randomly assigned to a
traditionally structured gymnasium-based program or to a
behaviorally based intervention.148 Increased contact by mail
or telephone also helps maintain long-term adherence to
exercise.149 Total exercise time during the course of a study is
greater when daily exercise is divided into multiple short bouts
(eg, 10-minute bouts 3 to 4 times per day) than one long bout
(eg, 30- to 40-minute bout once per day)150; ie, multiple short
bouts of exercise result in greater adherence to an exercise
program. In addition, many patients may be more compliant with
an exercise program conducted at home than at a health club
because fewer barriers are found with home-based exercise,
including costs and travel time. Developing a home-based walking
program and using home exercise equipment such as a treadmill
has been shown to improve exercise adherence and long-term
weight loss.151,152 Finally, exercise does not need to be a
structured activity. Altering daily lifestyle activities (eg,
walking instead of
riding, using stairs instead of escalators/elevators) may make
it easier to increase overall physical activity than would
participation in programmed exercise. In one study, weight loss
was similar after dietary therapy plus either lifestyle activity
or programmed exercise, but a trend toward better
maintenance of weight loss 1 year after treatment was observed
in individuals randomized to lifestyle activity than to
programmed exercise.153 Although these strategies are a welcome
improvement, all studies still report a decline in exercise
adherence over time.148,149,151,154 In summary, physical
activity is not an effective approach for achieving initial
weight loss, but it does have beneficial effects on fitness and
obesity-related complications such as CHD and diabetes. In
addition, a high level of regular physical activity is important
for preventing and attenuating
weight regain after diet-induced weight loss. Most data suggest
that it is the total volume of physical activity that is
important to weight management and that it does not matter
whether the activity is of moderate or vigorous intensity, a
lifestyle or structured program, or taken in a single bout each
day or in several intermittent bouts.
Behavior Modification
Behavior therapy focuses on analyzing and modifying eating and
activity behaviors that increase body weight and provides
techniques to help patients change their lifestyle habits and
overcome barriers to compliance. A summary of behavioral
strategies for treating obesity is shown in Table 3. The most
important principles of behavioral treatment are that it (1) is
goal-oriented and specifies goals that can be easily attained
and measured, (2) is process-oriented and helps patients develop
realistic goals and a reasonable plan for reaching those goals,
and (3) involves making small rather than large changes so that
incremental steps are taken to achieve larger and more distant
goals.155,156 Self-monitoring, the systematic observation and
recording of target behaviors, is the cornerstone of behavioral
treatment. 156 Self-monitoring tools include (1) food diaries in
which to record food intake, including types, amounts, energy
contents, and times, places, and feelings associated with eating
(usually in paper-and-pencil format but also available on the
Internet or in commercially available programs for use on a
personal digital assistant), (2) physical activity logs in which
to record the frequency, duration, and intensity of exercise or
step counters on which to monitor the daily steps
TABLE 3. Behavioral Strategies to Improve Weight Management
Strategy Description
Self-monitoring Record “what, where, and when” of eating and
physical activity to increase patients’ awareness of their own
behavior.
Goal setting Set specific short-term targets in eating and
exercise habits to achieve incremental improvements.
Stimulus control Identify triggers associated with poor eating
and physical activity behaviors, and design strategies to
break link.
Cognitive restructuring Change perceptions, thoughts, or
beliefs undermining weight control efforts, and help patients
develop realistic expectations about weight loss.
Problem solving Analyze situations preventing maintenance of a
healthier lifestyle and identify possible solutions to
problems; maintain philosophy that planning, not willpower, is
key to weight management.
Relapse prevention Develop skills based on premise that lapses
in weight control behavior can be anticipated in certain
situations (eg, travel, celebrations, bad mood).
Stress management
Decrease psychological stress to prevent dysfunctional eating.
Contingency management Use rewards (tangible or verbal) to
increase performance of specific behaviors or when specified
goals reached.
Social support Use assistance from family members and friends
in modifying lifestyle behaviors.
Ongoing contact Maintain visits, telephone calls, or Internet
communication with physician and office staff or other
healthcare professionals to promote adherence with recommended
lifestyle changes.
taken, and (3) weight scales on which to measure changes in
body weight. Self-monitoring increases patients’ awareness of
their behaviors, generates records that can be reviewed by
healthcare professionals, and provides targets for
intervention. In clinical practice, formal behavior therapy
can be provided through group sessions or individual meetings
with a healthcare professional who is skilled in the
delivery of behavioral techniques used to modify lifestyle
habits.155,157 If possible, contact should be regular,
preferably once every 1 to 2 weeks, during the initial 6-month
phase of a treatment program.155 Comprehensive group behavior
therapy, in conjunction with diet and physical activity,
usually results in an 9% body weight loss within 26 weeks of
treatment (0.5kg/week).157 Patients usually regain 33% of
their lost weight in the year after ending behavior therapy,
but most still maintain a weight loss of 5% at the end of 1
year.Providing ongoing contact by scheduled visits, telephone
calls, food evaluation and exercise diaries, and Internet
communication can enhance long-term adherence and helps
prevent weight regain.158,159 In addition, Internet-based
treatment programs for weight loss160,161 and structured
commercial programs such as Weight Watchers162 can augment the
professional guidance provided by the physician.
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy can help selected patients lose weight. The
approved indications for drug therapy for obesity are a BMI
30 kg/m2 or a BMI between 27 and 29.9 kg/m2 in
conjunctionwith an obesity-related medical complication in
patients with no contraindications for therapy. Effective
pharmacotherapy for obesity is likely to require long-term, if
not lifelong, treatment because patients who respond to drug
therapy usually regain weight when the therapy is stopped. The
expected length of drug treatment of obese patients who
respond to therapy makes it important to carefully consider
the long-term risks of being obese, the beneficial effects of
pharmacotherapy on body weight and obesity-associated
diseases, and the side effects and costs of treatment before
beginning therapy. In addition, pharmacotherapy alone is not
as effective as pharmacotherapy given in conjunction with a
comprehensive weight-management program.163 Therefore,
patients given drug treatment without the other standard
approaches to weight management, including behavior
modification, diet education, and activity counseling, are
exposed to all of the risks of drug treatment without all of
the medical benefits. Drug therapy adds a level of complexity
to the treatment of obesity. The patient with medication
prescribed for obesity may have comorbidities that already
require pharmacotherapy, thereby increasing the likelihood of
nonadherence.164 Strategies to enhance medication compliance
include regularly assessing adherence and response to therapy,
counseling about and reinforcing the importance of adherence,
simplifying
the treatment regimen, assisting the patient in reducing
barriers to adherence, providing reminders and cues to
facilitate improved adherence, and enlisting support when
needed.159,164 –166 In addition, weight loss drugs usually are
not covered by health insurance or health care plans, so a
considerable economic incentive exists for the obese patient
to discontinue taking these medications. Medications for the
treatment of obesity available in the United States are listed
in Table 4. Effective therapy for obesity usually requires
chronic intervention; however, only 2 drugs, sibutramine and
orlistat, are approved for long-term use.
Sibutramine
Pharmacology : sibutramine is a -phenethylamine derivative
that blocksthe reuptake of norepinephrine, sibutramine, and,
to a lesser degree, dopamine. Sibutramine decreases food
intake by producing early satiety during feeding and by
delaying initiation of the next meal. Although sibutramine has
no potential for abuse, it is classified as a Schedule IV
drug. Sibutramine is available in 5-, 10-, and 15-mg doses; 10
mg/d as a single daily dose is the recommended starting level,
with titration up or down based on response. Doses 15 mg/d
are not recommended.
Clinical Efficacy
In a 1-year RCT, subjects treated with sibutramine lost 7% of
their initial body weight and those treated with placebo lost
2%. Of the subjects treated with sibutramine or placebo, 57%
and 20%, respectively, lost 5% of their initial body
weight;34% and 7%, respectively, lost 10% of their initial
body weight.167 Weight loss with intermittent sibutramine
therapy (15 mg/d given during weeks 1 through 12, 19 through
30, and 37 through 48, and placebo given during the two 6-week
periods when sibutramine was withdrawn) was equivalent to
weight loss with continuous sibutramine therapy (15 mg/d).168
Sibutramine therapy also has been shown to maintain weight
loss for 12 to 18 months in subjects who initially lost weight
by eating a VLCD163 or who successfully lost weight after 6
months of sibutramine treatment.170 The use of sibutramine in
obese patients with either medication-controlled
hypertension171 or type 2 diabetes mellitus172causes greater
weight loss than with placebo therapy, but the overall weight
loss is less than that observed in studies conducted in
subjects who do not have comorbid disease. Weight loss with
sibutramine therapy is more effective
when combined with behavior and dietary therapies. In a 1-year
RCT, weight loss with sibutramine therapy alone was 5 kg,
with sibutramine therapy plus behavior modification was 10
kg, and with sibutramine therapy plus behavior modification
and a structured meal plan was 15 kg.173
Side Effects and Safety
The most common side effects of sibutramine are dry mouth,
constipation, and insomnia. Sibutramine increases
TABLE 4. Drugs Approved by FDA for Treating Obesity
Generic Name
DEA
Schedule
Orlistat None
Sibutramine hydrochloride IV
Phentermine IV
Diethylpropion hydrochloride IV
Benzphetamine hydrochloride III
Phendimetrazine tartrate III
DEA indicates Drug Enforcement Agency.
2958 Circulation November 2, 2004
heart rate (a dose of 10 to 15 mg/d causes an increase in
heart rate of 4 to 6 bpm) usually in the first few weeks of
treatment and lasts as long as the drug is taken. Sibutramine
also causes a dose-related increase in blood pressure (a dose
of 10 to 15 mg/d causes an average increase in systolic and
diastolic blood pressure of 2 to 4 mm Hg) and can prevent
weight loss–induced decrease in blood pressure.155 Therefore,
careful monitoring is needed when combining sibutramine with
other drugs that can increase blood pressure. Sibutramine
should not be used in patients who have uncontrolled
hypertension, a history of coronary artery disease, congestive
heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, or stroke, or who are
being treated with
monoamine oxidase inhibitors or selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitors.
CVD Risk Factors
The composite data from RCTs demonstrate that sibutramine
causes improvements in serum triglyceride, total cholesterol,
LDL-C, and HDL-C concentrations that are directly related to
the magnitude of the weight loss. However, sibutramine therapy
decreases or eliminates weight loss–
induced benefits on blood pressure.
Orlistat
Pharmacology
Orlistat blocks the digestion and absorption of dietary fat by
binding to intestinal lipases.174 The percentage of fat that
is malabsorbed is related to drug dose in a curvilinear
fashion.175 Near-maximal fat malabsorption occurs at a dose of
120 mg when given with a meal, which causes malabsorption of
30% of fat ingested from a meal that contains 30of energy as
fat. Less than 1% of ingested orlistat is absorbed;
therefore, it has no effect on systemic lipases.176
Clinical Efficacy
The effects of orlistat on body weight and CHD risk factors
have been evaluated in a large number of RCTs. The data from
most studies demonstrate that at 1 year, subjects who were
randomized to orlistat therapy (120 mg tid) lost 8% to10% of
their initial body weight and those randomized to
placebo therapy lost 4% to 6%.177–181 Approximately 33%more
patients treated with orlistat lost 5% of their bodyweight
than did those treated with placebo; 2 times as manypatients
treated with orlistat lost 10% of their body weightas did
those treated with placebo. Ending orlistat therapy
results in weight regain,177,180 and starting orlistat therapy
after successful diet-induced weight loss helps maintain body
weight.182 In subjects with obesity and type 2 diabetes
mellitus who are treated with sulfonylureas,183 metformin,184
or insulin,185 the percentage who achieve a 5% or 10%
reduction in body weight is 2 to 3 times higher in those
receiving orlistat plus dietary therapy than it is in those
receiving dietary therapy alone. The overall weight loss
effect of orlistat therapy in patients with diabetes is less
than that reported in previous studies of obese patients who
did not
have diabetes, however. Recently, the results of a 4-year RCT
were reported.28 The lowest body weight was achieved during
the first year and
was greater in the orlistat-treated group (11% weight loss)
than in the placebo-treated group (6% weight loss). Subjects
regained weight during the remainder of the trial;
orlistattreated subjects had lost 6.9% of their initial body
weight and placebo-treated subjects had lost 4.1% at the end
of 4 years. Orlistat therapy also decreased the cumulative
4-year incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus by 37%. Side
Effects and Safety About 70% to 80% of subjects treated with
orlistat experienced 1 gastrointestinal event as compared
with50% to 60% of those treated with placebo.
Gastrointestinal
events usually occurred early (within the first 4 weeks), were
of mild or moderate intensity, were usually limited to 1 or 2
episodes, and resolved despite continued orlistat treatment.
Approximately 4% of subjects treated with orlistat and 1% of
subjects treated with placebo withdrew from the studies
because of gastrointestinal complaints. During treatment,
small decreases in plasma fat-soluble vitamins, particularly
vitamins A, D, and E, can
occur, although plasma concentrations almost always remain
within the reference range. A few patients, however, may
experience decreases in plasma vitamin concentrations to below
the reference range. Because it is impossible to determine a
priori which patients will need vitamin supplements, it is
recommended that all patients who are treated with orlistat be
given a daily multivitamin supplement that is taken at a time
when orlistat is not being
ingested. Orlistat can have medically significant effects on
the absorption of lipophilic medications if both drugs are
taken simultaneously. Subtherapeutic plasma cyclosporin levels
that occurred in organ transplant recipients after they began
orlistat therapy for obesity have been reported.186–189
Therefore, orlistat should not be taken for 2 hours before or
afterthe ingestion of lipophilic drugs, and plasma drug
concentrations should be followed to ensure appropriate
dosing. Orlistat does not affect the absorption of selected
drugs with a narrow therapeutic index (warfarin, digoxin,
phenytoin) and selected drugs that are likely to be taken
concomitantly with orlistat (glyburide, oral contraceptives,
furosemide, captopril, nifedipine, and atenolol).189CVD Risk
Factors Because of its weight loss effects, orlistat therapy
improves all major cardiovascular disease risk factors such
as blood pressure and insulin sensitivity. Moreover, data from
several RCTs suggest that orlistat has a beneficial effect on
serum cholesterol concentrations that is independent of weight
loss alone. Subjects given orlistat had a greater reduction in
serum LDL-C concentrations than
those given placebo, even after adjusting for percentage of
weight loss.178,179 The mechanism responsible for this
additional lipid-lowering effect may be related to the effect
of orlistat in blocking both dietary cholesterol and
triglyceride absorption.190 In contrast, orlistat is not as
effective in lowering serum triglyceride concentrations,
presumably because it increases the proportion of absorbed
energy derived from carbohydrate, which tends to increase
serum triglycerides.191
Phentermine
Phentermine is a -phenethylamine derivative that
stimulatesthe release of norepinephrine and dopamine from
nerve terminals. Although phentermine is not approved by the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for long-term use, it is
the most commonly prescribed anorexiant medication in the
United States,192 presumably because it is less expensive than
sibutramine. Phentermine was approved by the FDA 30 years
ago, when the criteria needed for approval were less rigorous
than they are currently. Therefore, fewer studies have
evaluated the efficacy and safety Klein et al Clinical
Implications of Obesity 2959 of phentermine therapy than have
evaluated sibutramine and orlistat. Only one long-term (36
weeks) RCT evaluated the effect of phentermine therapy on body
weight.193 In that study, obese women were randomized to
dietary therapy and treatment with daily phentermine, daily
phentermine every other month alternating with daily placebo
every other month, or daily placebo. Of the 108 enrolled
subjects, approximately two thirds completed the study; among
those who completed the study, the groups that received either
continuous or intermittent phentermine therapy lost 13% of
their initial weight as compared with a 5% weight loss in the
placebo group.
Side Effects and Safety
The most common side effects of phentermine are dry mouth,
insomnia, and constipation. Although all sympathomimetic
agents can increase blood pressure and heart rate, these side
effects are uncommon when weight loss is adequate.
Herbal Products
Several different dietary supplements and herbal preparations
have been used to treat obesity, including chromium
picolinate, garcinia cambogia as a source of hydroxycitrate,
chitosan that is claimed to reduce fat absorption,
phenylephrine from Citrus aurantium (bitter orange), and ma
huang as a
source of ephedra alkaloids with or without guarana as a
source of caffeine. In general, few RCTs have evaluated the
clinical efficacy of these agents, and most of the RCTs that
have been done were of substandard quality194–196; however,
data from several RCTs demonstrated greater weight loss in
subjects given herbal products that contain ephedra than in
those given placebo.197,198 Nonetheless, the sale of ephedra
in over-the-counter products was recently banned by the FDA
because of concerns about serious adverse cardiovascular
effects.
Clinical Evaluation
The physician’s office should be an environment that is
sensitive to the needs of obese patients. The waiting room
should contain chairs without arms, large gowns and large
blood pressure cuffs should be available, and a scale that can
weigh patients who weigh 300 lb should be available and
located in a private area. The initial assessment should
include an appropriate history, physical examination, and
laboratory tests.
History
In addition to a standard medical interview, a patient’s
history should include an assessment of (1) weight history
(highest and lowest adult body weight, previous weight loss
attempts, weight pattern, and potential triggers and social
and environmental factors that contributed to weight gain),
(2) dietary history, including an assessment of types and
timing of meals and snacks and an attempt to identify possible
triggers that result in excessive energy intake, (3) physical
activity and function (daily and exercise activities, physical
limitations, effect of obesity on physical ifestyle), (4)
obesity-related health risk (age of onset and duration of
obesity, family history of obesity and obesity-related medical
complications, current obesity-related disease),
(5) possible psychiatric illnesses, such as binge eating
disorder and depression, that may require therapy before a
weight loss program is initiated, and (6) ability to lose
weight (desire to lose weight, weight loss goals and
expectations, limitations for achieving weight loss, including
medications and illnesses, lifestyle and work patterns,
financial resources, and special needs).
Physical Examination
The patient’s BMI and waist circumference should be
determined. BMI is generally correlated with percentage of
body fat in a curvilinear fashion.208 Some people with an
“obese” BMI, who have a normal amount of body fat and a large
muscle mass, are not at increased risk for CHD, whereas people
with a “normal” BMI, who have excessive body fat and small
muscle mass, are at increased risk. Waist circumference,
measured halfway between the lastrib and the iliac crest,
correlates with abdominal fat mass.5 Table 6 provides a
classification of risk based on BMI. A waist circumference of
88 cm (35 in) for women and102 cm (40 in) for men is
associated with an increasedrisk of metabolic diseases and
CHD.1 Additional assessments should include measuring blood
pressure with a large cuff and searching for physical signs of
right or left ventricular dysfunction, congestive heart
failure, and pulmonary disease. An electronic stethoscope can
increase a physician’s ability to detect cardiac abnormalities
in patients
who are extremely obese.
Laboratory Tests
An ECG is needed to check for evidence of CHD and to obtain a
baseline tracing for future comparisons. Standard blood tests
should be performed to search for CHD risk factors, including
prediabetes (impaired fasting blood glucose or impaired
glucose tolerance), dyslipidemia (increased triglycerides, low
HDL-C, and increased LDL-C), and the metabolic syndrome.
Additional studies may be needed to further evaluate specific
clinical suspicions based on the history and physical
examination, such as
TABLE 6. Weight Classification by BMI*
Obesity Class BMI, kg/m2 Disease Risk
Underweight 18.5 Increased
Normal 18.5–24.9 Normal
Overweight 25.0–29.9 Increased
Obesity I 30.0–34.9 High
II 35.0–39.9 Very high
Extreme Obesity III 40.0 Extremely high
*Data from Obes Res.1
Additional adiposity-related risk factors: waist circumference
40 (in men)
and 35 (in women); weight gain of 5 kg since age 18–20 y.
TABLE 7. Weight Loss Treatment Guidelines*
BMI Category, kg/m2
Treatment 25.0 –26.9 27.0 –29.9 30.0 –34.9 35.0 –39.9 40.0
Diet, physical activity, behavior therapy, or all 3 Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Pharmacotherapy† With obesity-related disease Yes Yes Yes
Surgery‡ With obesity-related disease Yes
*Data from Obes Res.1
†Pharmacotherapy should be considered only in patients who are
not able to achieve adequate weight loss by available
conventional lifestyle modifications and
who have no absolute contraindications for drug therapy.
‡Bariatric surgery should be considered only in patients who
are unable to lose weight with available conventional therapy
and who have no absolute
contraindications for surgery.
Klein et al Clinical Implications of Obesity 2961
sleep studies to diagnose OHS or OSA and an exercise treadmill
test or electron beam computerized tomography scanning or both
to evaluate CHD risk. The comparative value of exercise
tolerance testing and electron beam computerized tomography in
obese subjects has not been determined. Exercise treadmill
testing is not recommended for patients without cardiac
symptoms, and neither exercise treadmill testing nor electron
beam computerized tomography scanning should be performed in
patients who are at low risk for CHD, based on clinical
judgment or Framingham risk score.209 –211
Therapeutic Options
Appropriate management requires identifying patients whoneed
treatment, developing a realistic treatment plan, and
implementing a defined treatment strategy that can be modified
as needed during long-term surveillance. The Practical Guide
to the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight
and Obesity in Adults was developed by the North American
Association for the Study of Obesity in conjunction with the
National Heart,
Lung, and Blood Institute.212 Suggested guidelines from the
guide for selecting among different weight loss treatment
options, based on disease risk, are shown in Table 7. A
typical clinical consultation involves a physician’s giving
advice without adequate consideration of the patient’s
priorities, motivation, or confidence in undertaking
change.213 In contrast, obesity therapy should involve
“patient-centered counseling,” which encourages patients to
set goals and express their own ideas for therapy, with input
from the healthcare professional. The treatment plan also must
take into account the patient’s readiness for therapy and the
patient’s ability to comply with the proposed treatment plan.
Realistic goals should be established and frequent follow-up
visits should be scheduled to monitor progress, modify the
treatment plan as needed, and provide encouragement. Effective
therapy requires a longterm structured approach with continued
support from the physician and other caregivers, particularly
during periods of patient recidivism and weight regain.
Reducing energy intake is the cornerstone of weight management
therapy. Providing appropriate nutrition counseling and the
behavior modification therapy needed to implement dietary
changes within the setting of a busy outpatient practice is
difficult if not impossible for most physicians because they
do not have the time or expertise to provide this kind of
care. Therefore, referral to a reputable weight loss program
or experienced dietitian should be considered, if these
resources are available. Additional therapy with weight loss
medications or bariatric surgery can be useful in properly
selected patientsref.
Prevention : in a typical US
housing estate, the only way to reach workplaces, shops and
schools is by car. Many streets lack pavements, and cycle
paths are virtually unheard of. To really fight the flab, US
public-health officials are now realizing that they may have
to change the entire layout of towns. The suburban mansion and
sport-utility vehicle (SUV) may fulfil the American dream,
they say, but it is taking an unforeseen toll on health. One
study from last year compared the health of people living in
foot-friendly city areas with that of those dwelling in
sprawling, car-dependent suburbs. People's average weight and
level of hypertension rose along with the degree of sprawl.
And although purpose-built recreation centres and parks are
well intentioned, experts say that only a fraction of people
make the effort to use them. One seemingly obvious way to
eliminate people's dependence on cars is to design communities
in which shops, schools and workplaces are within walking
distance of homes. One community called Southern Village in
North Carolina, for example, is built to be more like a
traditional neighbourhood with pavements, trails and parks
aplenty. Such solutions may seem intuitive, but researchers
point out that there is no evidence that living in such
communities actually stops people piling on the pounds.
Concerns about traffic, crime or other social factors can
prevent people from venturing outdoors. At present, for
instance, many US local authorities have zoning regulations
that were originally designed to get people out of polluted or
unsafe cities into the countryside, and these prohibit the
construction of houses and businesses next door to one
another. Some commentators point out that the house-building,
motor and road industries are not used to considering public
health in their plans, and are somewhat slow to change. More
studies showing the effectiveness of exercise-friendly
communities will help to convince policy-makers and industries
of the importance of health. The health institute has $3
million of funding for such research next year and hopes to
offer more in future years
Prognosis : yearly, around a
quarter of a million deaths in Europe and more than 2.5
million deaths worldwide are weight-related, with
cardiovascular disease as the leading cause
Web resources
Bibliography :
- adipose tissue
cancers
- lipoma : a benign, soft,
rubbery, encapsulated tumor of adipose tissue, usually
composed of mature fat cells; it generally occurs as a
solitary lesion in the subcutaneous tissue of the trunk,
nucha, or forearms but may occur in deeper soft tissues.
- lipoma arborescens : an intraarticular tumor
usually occurring as a solitary lesion in the knee; it is
characterized by numerous swollen treelike synovial
villous projections of fatty tissue, and may arise de novo
or be associated with disorders such as degenerative joint
disease, chronic rheumatoid arthritis, or previous
traumatic injury.
- lipoma capsulare : a fatty tumor due to
increase of the fat in the capsule of an organ.
- epidural lipoma : an intraspinal lipoma on or
outside the spinal dura mater in the thoracic or lumbar
region, often causing spinal cord compression; Cushing's disease is a
common causes.
- intermuscular lipoma : a slow-growing,
infiltrating lesion composed of mature fat cells,
occurring in the deeper soft tissues between large muscle
groups, predominantly those of the thighs, shoulders, or
arms of middle-aged to older adults.
- intradural lipoma : an intraspinal lipoma with
components within or beneath the dura mater of the spine
or sacrum.
- intramedullary lipoma : an intraspinal lipoma
within the spinal cord.
- intramuscular lipoma : a lesion similar to
intermuscular lipoma, but occurring within muscle.
- intraspinal lipoma : a lipoma within the spinal
canal; it may exist entirely within the canal or it may
protrude and form part of a lipomyelomeningocele.
- lipoma ossificans : an ossified lipoma.
- spindle cell lipoma : a rare, benign,
circumscribed, painless lesion occurring in the dermis or
subcutaneous tissue of the posterior neck or shoulder,
particularly in middle-aged or older males; it is
characterized by lipocytes, spindle cells, bundles of
birefringent collagen, and a myxoid stroma.
- hibernoma / fetal lipoma /
granular cell lipoma : a rare, benign, encapsulated
tumor of soft tissues, arising from vestiges of brown fat
resembling that in certain hibernating animal species; it is
a small, lobulated, nontender, tan to dark lesion occurring
usually on the mediastinum or intrascapular region of female
adults, but also in armpits and retroperitoneum. Cells are
large with lipofuscin granules, many mitochondria, and
crystalline structures seen at TEM.
- lipoma fibrosum / fibrolipoma
: lipoma containing an excess of fibrous tissue
- telangiectatic lipoma / lipoma telangiectodes / angiolipoma / lipoma cavernosum
: a lipoma containing clusters of thin-walled proliferating
blood vessels; it is frequently painful
- lipoma sarcomatodes / liposarcoma
: a malignant mesenchymal tumor usually arising from the
intermuscular fascia, particularly in the upper thigh, and
occurring predominantly in male adults. It is derived from
primitive or embryonal lipoblastic cells which exhibit
varying degrees of lipoblastic and/or lipomatous
differentiation, and is divided into several variant forms.
- dedifferentiated liposarcoma : a highly
malignant form in which areas of well-differentiated
liposarcoma coexist with areas of specific or
undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma.
- myxoid liposarcoma : the most common form of
liposarcoma, characterized by primitive mesenchymal cells
in a mucopolysaccharide-rich ground substance and a
plexiform capillary network; lipoblasts may be scarce. It
metastasizes late, if at all.
- pleomorphic liposarcoma : a highly
undifferentiated and anaplastic form with a high
metastatic potential; it is characterized by many large
tumor giant cells and unusual lipoblasts with frequent,
abnormal mitotic figures.
- round cell liposarcoma : a highly vascular form
characterized by small round to oval cells with fine
vacuolated cytoplasm and dark central nuclei and by
occasional lipoblasts, which are commonly without mitotic
figures; it frequently metastasizes.
- well-differentiated liposarcoma : a form
resembling lipoma, having adult type fat cells and
sometimes bizarre, atypical lipoblasts, with infrequent
mitoses and tumor giant cells; it may be locally
aggressive but rarely metastasizes.
- mixed tumors
- lipohypertrophy :
hypertrophy of subcutaneous fat.
- insulin
lipohypertrophy : localized hypertrophy of
subcutaneous fat at insulin
injection sites caused by the lipogenic effect of insulin
- lipodystrophy / lipoatrophy
/ lipodystrophia : a group of conditions due to
defective metabolism of fat, resulting in the absence of
subcutaneous fat.
- localized lipodystrophy
- injection sites
- centrifugal lipodystrophy begins in abdomen,
inguinal and axillary areas in babies with age < 3;
self-limiting after 8-10 years
- partial lipodystrophy
- congenital partial lipodystrophy
- progressive
familial
partial lipodystrophy (FPLD) / lipodystrophia
progressiva : a condition occurring
especially in females in the first decade of life,
characterized by a symmetrical loss of subcutaneous fat,
usually beginning on the face and gradually extending to
the chest, neck, back, and upper extremities, giving the
lower part of the body an apparent, and possibly real,
adiposity of the buttocks, thighs, and legs. Some
affected patients develop type 2
diabetes mellitus, hypertriglyceridemia
,
and membranoproliferative
glomerulonephritis
- Dunnigan
variant :
Aetiology : missense
mutations in exon 8 (most) or exon 11 lamin A/C
Pathogenesis : apoptosis
and degeneration of adipocytes
Symptoms & signs :
normal during childhood; at puberty begins losing
subcutaneous fat at limbs and trunk showing increased
muscle mass. Many patients accumulate excess fat on
face, neck, and occasionally axillae and labia majora,
causing double chin, hump, and rounded face. Liver
steatosis not progressing to liver cirrhosis
Laboratory examinations :
mild-moderate insulin-resistance, decreased HDL-Ch,
severe hypertriglyceridemia
- Kobberling
variant : loss of fat in limbs with normal
distribution in face, hypertriglyceridemia
and diabetes
mellitus
- variant with mandibuloacral
dysplasia : dwarfism, acute voice,
mandibular and clavicular hypoplasia
- acquired partial lipodystrophy
- intestinal
lipodystrophy / Whipple's disease

- acquired partial lipodystrophy / Barraquer-Simons
syndrome
Pathogenesis : C3NeF
(90%) => activation of alternative pathway of
complement cascade => cytolysis of adipocytes
expressing factor
D / adipsin
Symptoms & signs : fat
depots at hips and lower limbs, membranoproliferative
glomerulonephritis
,
autoimmune diseases (systemic
lupus
erythematosus
,
autoimmune
gastritis
,
juvenile
dermatomyositis
,
rheumatoid
arthritis
,
celiac
disease
with dermatitis
herpetiformis
,
Sjogren's
syndrome
,
giant
cell
arteritis
,
leukocytoclastic
vasculitis
)
- after 18-24 months of assumption of HIV-1
protease
inhibitors
;
stavudine-based regimens have a higher cumulative
prevalence of lipoatrophy than regimens based on
zidovudine, abacavir, or tenofovir. Regimens based on
nelfinavir are associated with more rapid fat loss than
efavirenz. In general, thymidine-based nucleoside
analogues have been most associated with lipoatrophy and
protease inhibitor drugs most associated with the
metabolic syndrome.
Pathogenesis : metabolic
syndrome (dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance, visceral
adiposity)
Symptoms & signs :
subcutaneous lipoatrophy in face, trunk and limbs, with
deposition in neck (Madelung's neck : double chin
and hump); hypertriglyceridemia
and diabetes
mellitus
Therapy : treatment switching
(from protease inhibitors to non-nucleoside
reverse-transcriptase inhibitors or abacavir), and use of
metformin and recombinant
human growth hormone
has led to some
success with managing the metabolic manifestations and
local fat accumulations
Therapy : thigh fat
transplantation into face lasts 2-5 years, liposuction
or lipectomy
- total lipodystrophy
- congenital total lipodystrophy
- progressive
total
lipodystrophy / congenital generalized lipodystrophy
(CGL) / Berardinelli-Seip syndrome / lipoatrophic
diabetes : a rare autosomal recessive
disorder seen mainly in females in infancy,
characterized by
Aetiology : mutations in 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate
O-acyltransferase-2
(AGPAT2) or in BSCL2 /
seipin; also mutations in InsR
,
b3-AR
, fatty acid
binding protein 2 (FABP2), IGF-1R
,
IRS-1,
HSL, leptin
,
PPARg
,
and CGL1
/ granzyme B
Symptoms & signs :
generalized loss of subcutaneous and extracutaneous
adipose tissue associated with hepatomegaly, hypoglycemia
and insulin-resistant nonketotic diabetes, hyperlipemia,
elevation of the basal metabolic rate (due to
hyperactivity or orthosympathetic nervous system or to
compensate excessive heat losses due to lack of adipose
tissue), accelerated somatic growth, advanced bone age, acanthosis
nigricans
,
umbilical hernia or raised umbilicus, liver steatosis,
splenomegaly and nephromegaly (abdominal protuberances),
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, acromegaloid habitus, hyperhidrosis
,
and hirsutism
.
Fatty tissue still remains at hand palsm and foot soles,
orbits, scalp, perineum, iuxtaarticular and epidural
regions. Pancreas amyloidosis
and extreme insulin resistance => diabetes
mellitus, hypertriglyceridemia
Prognosis : liver
cirrhosis
,
acute
pancreatitis
,
diabetic nephropathy
- acquired total lipodystrophy
- acquired generalized lipodystrophy / Lawrence
syndrome
Epidemiology : during
childhood or adolescence
Aetiology : after shingles
,
measles virus
,
Bordetella
pertussis
,
pneumonia
,
osteomyelitis
,
mumps virus
,
HHV-4
/
EBV
,
hepatitis
Pathogensis : autoimmune
disease (juvenile
dermatomyositis
,
juvenile
rheumatoid
arthritis
,
Hashimoto's
disease
,
autoimmune
hemolytic
anemia
,
autoimmune
hepatitis
,
vitiligo
)
with anti-adipocyte antibodies
Symptoms & signs : acute
panniculitis
=> mild hirsutism
,
acanthosis
nigricans
(33%), liver
steatosis
,
diabetes mellitus. Superficial muscles
and veins are accentuated.
- disseminated
necrosis of adipose tissue
Aetiology :
Pathogenesis : release of
pancreatic lipase into bloodstream
Therapy :
- PPARg agonists
increase
subcutaneous fat mass, but rosiglitazone, at the maximum
dose of 8 mg a day, does not improve fat mass in HIV
lipoatrophyref.
- the effects of leptin
on adipose tissue mass are not reported. Both treatments
improve metabolic variables and reduce the size of the
liver. Additionally, leptin reduces hepatic and
intramyocellular lipid content.
- lipomatosis / liposis : a
condition characterized by abnormal localized, or tumor-like,
accumulations of fat in the tissues.
- lipomatosis atrophicans : localized accumulations
of fat in certain tissues, associated with emaciation of the
rest of the body
- polymicrolipomatosis : lipomatosis marked by the
presence in the subcutaneous tissues of numerous small
lipomas.
- lipomatosis gigantea : a form in which the
adipose deposits form large masses.
Localizations :
- Shwachman-Diamond
syndrome
/ congenital lipomatosis of pancreas

- diffuse lipomatosis / diffuse lipoma : abnormal
increase of subcutaneous fat in the parts above the pelvis,
usually in males.
- nodular
circumscribed lipomatosis : the formation of multiple
circumscribed or encapsulated lipomas which may be
distributed symmetrically (multiple symmetrical
lipomatosis (MSL) / Madelung's disease) or haphazardly
or which may form a collar around the neck (Madelung's
neck : hump, double chin), supraclavear region and
shoulders. At times they may be painful (lipoma, or
lipomatosis, dolorosa).
Epidemiology : male:female ratio
= 4-15
Aetiology : A8344G or G8363A
transitions in mtDNA encoding tRNA lysine
(MTTK)
(also peripheral
neuropathy
, myopathy
, cerebellar
ataxia
,myoclonus
and
hearing loss
)
Symptoms & signs :
laryngeal, tracheal, or cava vein compression, accumulations
of fat in the neck, shoulders and other parts of the trunk
Laboratory examinations : high
HDL-Ch
- renal lipomatosis /
lipomatosis renis : fatty masses within the kidney.
- mediastinic
lipomatosis
Aetiology : Cushing syndrome
Symptoms & signs : tracheal
compression
- pelvic lipomatosis
Symptoms & signs : nycturia,
pollakiuria, dysuria, constipation, abdominal pain in lower
quadrants, bilateral ureteral obstruction
- epidural
lipomatosis in thoracic or lumbar spine
Symptoms & signs : backache,
radicular pain, or compression or spinal cord